The Lake County Hold Up
Wednesday, May 7th, 2008So what exactly caused the hold up last night in Lake County, Indiana, which lead to the cliffhanger of an outcome in the state’s primary? The state wasn’t called for Senator Clinton until late into the night because Lake County–part of the Chicago suburbs– used a system of tabulating votes called “central counting” where absentee ballots are counted at the end of the day. This system is usually reserved for rural communities while urban areas tabulate absentee ballots throughout the day. Indiana Secretary of State Todd Rokita made it clear that the Lake County election board needs to change their ways:
“The fear is that when you go behind closed doors and you take a lot of time–of course the number one priority is accuracy, but when you take an overabundant amount of time and the nation not to mention the state is waiting the only thing that can come of that is suspicion of nefarious activities so you want to get if not a total count out at least partial count out–a rolling count out so that we all know again as tax payers, as voters that the count is occurring and that we are getting results on a piecemeal basis,” Rokita said, “That didn’t happen. That usually doesn’t happen in Lake County and they have been criticized before for that practice
Rokita mentioned Lake County’s less than stellar reputation when it comes to their election board. He said he usually sends teams of his deputies up to Lake County to monitor their elections and he is hoping for more transparency in the future. However, county election boards in Indiana are autonomous and state government can merely suggest changes and cannot regulate their behavior as long as it is lawful. Rokita said he is not going to investigate and does not suspect any illegal activity, but that he will continue to monitor the situation. He added that he wouldn’t put political mischief past the board:
“This is a board made up of politicians and political wannabes and I don’t put politics past delaying the vote or anything like that, but I can’t find anything they did that is contrary to Indiana law at this point.”
Rokita was adamant that transparency and the ability for the media and public to monitor the vote count process is imperative and he will continue to ask Lake County that they change their system:
“They have to be doing better than the other guy because of their reputation, but there is no excuse for not reporting out at least the partial tally as they are counting,” Rokita stressed, “We haven’t had any reports that media weren’t allowed to watch the tally. But certainly that has to be the case. This isn’t Rome where a puff of white smoke comes out and the two party chairmen announce the results. I mean in order for people to have trust in the process they have to be able to see it. Giving a partial tally throughout the night like you do in the rest of this country really is something they ought to adopt.”
