Does this mean we can get rid of the NAACP, Black Caucus and all the bloody excuses and entitlements given to poor minorities claiming that they are being held down by “the man”?

For Gods sake, “the MAN” would now have given them a CEO, 4 Star General, Secretary of State X’s 2 and the President of the free world!

Excuses over, no more need for gov’t funded “advancement programs”, and we’ll need a white caucus set up because man will we be in need of that!

If Republicans were smart, they’d start getting this message out to the minority neighborhoods, because there isn’t a welfare recipient alive that wants this gravy train to end. Easier to blame, than accept you’re a lazy SH-T!

This is F Chris Nelson and I approve this message!

AWESOME!!!!!

There is a tendency for voters to separate the economy from foreign relations. That is inappropriate. They are connected, each influencing the other. Right now, there is a huge concern over the economy - but inept handling of our relationships around the world could make our situation such that the economy (no matter how bad) is almost irrelevant to our overall well-being.

I agree wholeheartedly that Barack Obama is just too dangerous to be President of the United States - and it is clear that there is at least a 50-50 chance that I will be in the unfortunate position of being able to say “I told you so” a year or so from now.

Does Senator McCain realize how we Americans feel about Governor Palin’s lack of experience AND knowledge of foreign affairs? Has the Straight Talk Express driven into crazy land.

Obama is Too risky.

Other countries will take advantage of that.

We can not allow other countries push us around and that is what is going to happen if Obama win.

Other countries fear McCain. That is what we need, America needs respect.

It is interesting and yet disturbing, really even scary, to see what is happening today on the political stage, with so much of it being strictly theatrical and totally scripted and obviously intended to misrepresent (deceive), and then to see the differences in the public’s reactions to those creative performances. Consider the confusing fact that the presidential race is even close, with what the Bush-Cheney administration has done over the last eight years and the drastically negative impact that it has had, and it is then really hard to understand. Possibly, as some say, it is a reflection of racial bias but really that can’t explain all of it. Take Senator McCain and not only his obvious, when all of the camouflage is put aside, commitment (and history) to continue with more of the same (Bush-Cheney) and the failed Republican policies/attitudes that are aimed to patronize Special Interests and a select few, but also McCain’s desperate and irresponsible selection of Sarah Palin for his running mate. Now you may like her personality, find her good looking, a real ‘cutesy’ and even agree with a few of her views but there can be no denying that she is extreme, bazaar and, most importantly, totally unqualified and just aggressively trying to disguise her inexperience and simply push a bold and belligerent presentation to manipulate public opinion. Her whole purpose is apparent as an ‘attack dog’ as she boldly criticizes with exaggerated and mostly irrelevant accusations while totally avoiding the real issues. Being a ‘hockey mom’ and a ‘pit bull with lipstick’ may make her interesting but it sure doesn’t qualify her to be vice-president or, most totally not, to be president. That should then be completely scary, yet many still rationalize that she is acceptable. It isn’t as if she is applying to be a next-door neighbor and come over for a barbecue, she wants to help and maybe even individually run the country. The real truth should be apparent to anyone that is willing to check their emotional ties, prejudices and biases, including their political affiliations, that we simply can’t withstand any further focus on Special Interests and a select few, that we can’t survive continuing with the same philosophies, that whether poor or middle class or upper middle class we are currently loosing substantially, and we desperately need real change (not just someone who claims to be a ‘Maverick’ but actually never did more than just adjust in his own best interests). If too many of us are sold on ignoring the facts, the truth, on accepting the subterfuge offered, we may just end up with more of the same, with literally continuing in the same direction we are currently going. This country can’t take that, this country desperately needs real, drastic and honest change! And really, common sense dictates that those who have taken us to where we are today should be prosecuted and not congratulated by electing others who supported them.

Barak 666 Obama is too risky for the world.

Risky isn’t the word, obsolutely crazy is more fitting. He bought his million dollar home the same time Rezco did, he lives in the same neihborhood as Ayers and was at his house for the kick off of his political career…nobody sees issues with these things? I don’t care what anyone says, this man is radical and is a threat to democracy. I can’t believe that he is as close as he is to leading our great country. I think he is an oprative for radical groups, a sleeper so to say, and we are all just letting it happen. His life story is freaking scary if you are a white person. WeE have to stop this guy or America will never be the same and our children will not be free in any sense of the word.

More dangerous than an increasingly erratic, reactionary and desperate McCain and naive, shallow and vindictive Palin. Not even Bush looks dangerous in comparison.

Obama too risky? Yes, I’d say that sums it up. If you put party politics aside, there are four facets of this race that truly matter: 1 - Obama has no experience whatsoever, while McCain has decades of experience. 2 - Obama has not been known to “reach across the aisle” during his “nano-career” as a senator, while McCain has made a decades-long practice of doing so. 3 - Obama has exhibited very negative sentiment about this country (and associated with others who feel the same), while McCain has actively defended this country. Finally, the 4th facet is that Obama, who has engaged heavily in earmark spending, wants to tax businesses in our slowing economy, while McCain, who never supports earmarks, wants to fuel the economy by reducing business taxes as a means of promoting growth. Game, set, match - I vote McCain/Palin.

Looking at the economy right now i must say you look more then risky McCain…

If we keep going down this path, there wont be any money to borrow and there will do no wars for us to fight

[...] These are the same remarks that on Friday Palin told FNC’s Carl Cameron she believes “disqualifies” him from being Commander in Chief. The McCain campaign also used the same language in a new attack ad released today called, “Dangerous.” [...]

I don’t know how anyone with an ounce of good common sense could vote for Obama. Good common sense like my Mom taught me, Choose your friends wisely. Obama is dangerous for our country and I fear that ACORN and people with no common sense or good American values are going to give him this election.

And what makes McCain believe that he is not also risky for American. His choice for vice-president is risky, they way he has handled the economic crisis is risky. So in reality is this not the pot calling the kettle black.