Comments on: Hillary’s Last Stand: Viva Puerto Rico

By: Lorenzo

Lorenzo — Tue, 27 May 2008 16:49:37 +0000

I thought this country was ready, I was wrong. I thought this was the home of the free,but to some we are still shackles. I thought we were ready for the change of tomorrow,but it the change of yesterday(40 years ago). We can be lead, but never lead. Some may never say it, but there way will never be tomorrow…

By: Dwayne

Dwayne — Mon, 26 May 2008 12:23:37 +0000

Hillary’s message to Obama should be I give up!!!

By: signs

signs — Mon, 26 May 2008 12:05:06 +0000

You know BO won’t while he goes around challenging McCain to debates he backs down from Hillary, he must be afraid the truth might come out that he has nothing compared to her.

He is a true hypocrite, the way he goes around saying he would be happy to have a debate about this or that but when Clinton steps up he runs,lol.

By: John W. Bush McCain

John W. Bush McCain — Mon, 26 May 2008 08:15:26 +0000

We Americans so no to John W. Bush McCain because we cannot afford him in treasure or blood.

By: American Woman

American Woman — Mon, 26 May 2008 07:37:26 +0000

Anyone able to post…

By: tess

tess — Mon, 26 May 2008 06:14:39 +0000

to get a life—–just came back…. i don’t mind you calling me fanatic though from your tone it seems to have a negative connotation. i am a Patriots, red sox, and celtics fanatics and from where i am it does not seem bad at all; but if you are from new york-well thaaaaaaaaaths is bad. what i am saying is i don’t mind being called a hillary fanatic by somebody who does not like hillary. that’s understandable. as for hrc playing victim, i’m quite sure that obama will do exactly as hillary is doing now if he were the one who won those states. my point all along is all the votes should be counted regardless who the winner is on those 2 states: and that all the remaining states must be allowed to vote because there is no clear winner, and hillary is not conceding at all even as obama is presumptuous enough to assume he is already the one. as for hillary’s high negatives, you surmised wrongly that i listen to pundits as YOU evidently do. i do read on obama. do you? the first was the rezco deal on his mansion in the chicago sun-times (cable news don’t expound on these). my first reaction was wow! this guy is not as clean as i thought him to be. and—it goes downhill from that. as for being biased, who is not? we all have our reasons why we lean towards some ideas or persons. you have yours, i have mine. as for your notion that i dislike obama for no apparent reason; on the contrary, i dislike obama for apparent reasons. i regret to tell you that i am one of those people who will switch to mccain if obama is the dems. nominee. i love my party but i love my country the most. with clear conscience i will vote for mccain. i’m relieved though that you do not dislike hillary that much and that you like carville as i do. well–goodnight and take care…

By: tess

tess — Mon, 26 May 2008 04:59:02 +0000

to get a life—just came back–so to respond to your response ( sound silly, doesn’t it?) if you want to label me a fanatic that’s fine; i’ve been following hillary’s career for awhile and foremost i deeply admire her tenacity and the will to surmount great odds and end on top plus her rare combination of brain and heart. whatever she has , she fought for. nowhere in my post did i say obama is against democracy. as for playing victim, obama will do exactly as she does had he won florida and michigan. do you doubt that? and—my point on my post is to count all votes regardless who the winner is in those two states and also to wait till everybody voted since nobody is the clear winner just yet. yes, i read on obama. the first turn-off was the rezco deal on his mansion in the chicago sun- times. my first reaction was wow! he is not as clean as i thought him to be. and–it went down hill from that. as for hillary’s positive and negative, again you surmised that i listen to the pundits which i in turn think YOU evidently do. i don’t give a rat’s tail about the punditry. as to what you said about me disliking obama for no apparent reason; on the contrary, i dislike obama for apparent reasons. i’m relieved to know that you do not dislike hillary that much and that you like carville as i do too. but i regret to say that i am one of those who will cross and vote for mccain this nov. if obama wins the dem. nomination. i love my country more than i love my party; mccain to me, is the better person to lead our country. take care and goodnight..

By: marla

marla — Sun, 25 May 2008 21:03:35 +0000

WHY HILLARY why??? you are starting to look really Bad! you are not going to get the Dem NOM! it’s OVER… you are looking SAD and if you get out now we can just remember what great things you done for “WOMAN” and while running and being a Sen. if you keep going there will no Longer be any Respect for you your family or Party.. STOP already you will not get 270 votes no superdelegates are going to do that for you. SUPERDELEGATES please PLEASE set in and VOTE so we can move forward and win the WHITE HOUSE BACK.

By: MICHAEL b.h. obama DUKAKIS

MICHAEL b.h. obama DUKAKIS — Sun, 25 May 2008 20:56:08 +0000

Comment by ThinkSmart
May 25th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
I wish people weren’t so dumb. Vote for principles and what the candidate believes in. If you agree with Hillary’s solution on issues, you must recognize Obama’s solutions are not far from hers and vise versa. If your democratic candidate looses the primary than the next best option is the other democratic candidate. Don’t throw your vote away in Nov because you want to be selfish and stubborn because you’re upset the rest of the country didn’t fully agree with you. Be smart. Vote on issues not whose pastor said what, or who said something that was taken out of context, or who has the support from who.
__________________________________________________________________
So you are saying that we should vote for Pdiddy if his solutions on issues agree with Hillary’s solution on issues? I do not vote for parties! Sure one might not believe everything that ones Pastor, Rabbi, or even the Pope says, but if you are Catholic one must believe in Catholicism or if you prctice the jewish faith, one must believe in Judaism. So obama must believe in Black Liberation Theology, because he belonged to that church for 20 years. Why did Oprah leave the church?

By: SUNSHINE

SUNSHINE — Sun, 25 May 2008 20:42:17 +0000

Rasmussen reporting new polling from Minnesota was released today showing Obama retaining a double digit lead over McCain. Polling released Friday showed Obama with the advantage in both Pennsylvania and New Hampshire. In both states, McCain had the edge a month ago……………………….. TURN OUT THE LIGHTS……..THE PARTY’S OVER!!!!!!!!!http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential