<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Camp Touts Superdelegate Lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aNoNym?</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138677</link>
		<dc:creator>aNoNym?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138677</guid>
		<description>OK, here are some of my thoughts, Barack never said that SD's were bad, just that they should not take priority over the voters. the popular vote has chosen him and now he has to finish this race in the superdelegates, it is only common sense. On the issue of Florida and Michigan, I see Sen. Clinton's use of the phrase "I won the popular vote (If you count FL and MI) not Sen. Obama" as a dirty trick, when she was down in the race, she decided to campaign in the two states, despite knowing they were not to be seated. I think peronally all remaining SD's should go for the candidate who is chosen by the public, and in my opinion that's Sen. Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here are some of my thoughts, Barack never said that SD&#8217;s were bad, just that they should not take priority over the voters. the popular vote has chosen him and now he has to finish this race in the superdelegates, it is only common sense. On the issue of Florida and Michigan, I see Sen. Clinton&#8217;s use of the phrase &#8220;I won the popular vote (If you count FL and MI) not Sen. Obama&#8221; as a dirty trick, when she was down in the race, she decided to campaign in the two states, despite knowing they were not to be seated. I think peronally all remaining SD&#8217;s should go for the candidate who is chosen by the public, and in my opinion that&#8217;s Sen. Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the southern dem</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138595</link>
		<dc:creator>the southern dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138595</guid>
		<description>Obama obtained the lead in delegates by fraud....those voters who voted for him before the real Obama was known were simply hoodwinked...bamboozled. Now we know much more about the guy and have discovered a great deal that was hidden from the public for so long. Associations are very important for any southside of chicago politician and these obama had in tight...Wright, ayers, farrahkahn. You do not get even a dog catcher job in this region of chicago with poliytical clout and approval by ther 3 wise men of southside politics. To think Obama could have opposite views compared to these terrorists, anti-americans and black power advocates and have their approval is pure fantasy. His thought process more likely than not mirrors these wisemen....he has just kept it buried and covered up....only his wife and the big mouth Wright have been the dead give-aways to show just what he likely believes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama obtained the lead in delegates by fraud&#8230;.those voters who voted for him before the real Obama was known were simply hoodwinked&#8230;bamboozled. Now we know much more about the guy and have discovered a great deal that was hidden from the public for so long. Associations are very important for any southside of chicago politician and these obama had in tight&#8230;Wright, ayers, farrahkahn. You do not get even a dog catcher job in this region of chicago with poliytical clout and approval by ther 3 wise men of southside politics. To think Obama could have opposite views compared to these terrorists, anti-americans and black power advocates and have their approval is pure fantasy. His thought process more likely than not mirrors these wisemen&#8230;.he has just kept it buried and covered up&#8230;.only his wife and the big mouth Wright have been the dead give-aways to show just what he likely believes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelee</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138590</link>
		<dc:creator>shelee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 00:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138590</guid>
		<description>I am so frightened for my family, friends, neighbors, and country. I told my Husband the day Barak announced he would be running for President, there is something about him that's not right. He tried to convince me that maybe deep down inside I was racist. It's not appropriate to tell you how I responded to him concidering my Grandaughters are 1/2 white 1/2 black &#38; 1/2white &#38; 1/2hispanic, all of my neices are dating either black or hispanics. I have black 2nd cousins, and one of my uncles is gay, why because WE are NOT racist. MY family we are the mixing pot.
Anyway the day he annouced his Candidacy, I felt sick to my stomach, weak in my knees and a intense amount of fear that was paralizing. No deep latent racism.........
Let me tell you this: I am energy sensitive and this isn't about white and black, it's about light and dark a.k.a good and evil. Hillary may be alot of things but deffinately evil she is not, McCain, nope not him either. It is Barak Obama. So having said that...........Holly, the very last part of the news article ie:  
        The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUS_LIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA?? 

I believe your right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so frightened for my family, friends, neighbors, and country. I told my Husband the day Barak announced he would be running for President, there is something about him that&#8217;s not right. He tried to convince me that maybe deep down inside I was racist. It&#8217;s not appropriate to tell you how I responded to him concidering my Grandaughters are 1/2 white 1/2 black &amp; 1/2white &amp; 1/2hispanic, all of my neices are dating either black or hispanics. I have black 2nd cousins, and one of my uncles is gay, why because WE are NOT racist. MY family we are the mixing pot.<br />
Anyway the day he annouced his Candidacy, I felt sick to my stomach, weak in my knees and a intense amount of fear that was paralizing. No deep latent racism&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
Let me tell you this: I am energy sensitive and this isn&#8217;t about white and black, it&#8217;s about light and dark a.k.a good and evil. Hillary may be alot of things but deffinately evil she is not, McCain, nope not him either. It is Barak Obama. So having said that&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Holly, the very last part of the news article ie:<br />
        The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUS_LIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA?? </p>
<p>I believe your right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138498</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138498</guid>
		<description>Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun (a black man)

It’s an amazing time to be alive in America. We’re in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front-running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first. 

We won’t truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won’t arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics. 

The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He’s not. He’s the next George McGovern. And it’s time people learned the facts. 

Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.
Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he’s not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant.. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let’s look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial ‘beauty.’ 

Start with national security, since the president’s most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holo -caust; and Kim Jong II, who is murd_ering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk. 

Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on ‘the rich.’ How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck. 

Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, ‘All praise and glory to God!’ but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have ‘hi jacked’ - hi jacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francis co values, not Middle America values. 

The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don’t start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of ‘bringing America together’ means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. 

But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they’re talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama’s radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton. 

It’s time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let’s first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.

Subject: Kind of scary, wouldn’t you think Remember–God is good, and is in time, on time â€” every time 

According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is: 

The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUS_LIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun (a black man)</p>
<p>It’s an amazing time to be alive in America. We’re in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front-running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first. </p>
<p>We won’t truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won’t arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics. </p>
<p>The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him. Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He’s not. He’s the next George McGovern. And it’s time people learned the facts. </p>
<p>Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.<br />
Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he’s not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant.. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let’s look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial ‘beauty.’ </p>
<p>Start with national security, since the president’s most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holo -caust; and Kim Jong II, who is murd_ering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk. </p>
<p>Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on ‘the rich.’ How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck. </p>
<p>Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, ‘All praise and glory to God!’ but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have ‘hi jacked’ - hi jacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francis co values, not Middle America values. </p>
<p>The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don’t start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of ‘bringing America together’ means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs. </p>
<p>But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they’re talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama’s radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton. </p>
<p>It’s time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let’s first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.</p>
<p>Subject: Kind of scary, wouldn’t you think Remember–God is good, and is in time, on time â€” every time </p>
<p>According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is: </p>
<p>The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUS_LIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal….the prophecy says that people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138450</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138450</guid>
		<description>With Michigan offering the 69 59 split, add in 34% of the Flordia delegates, Obama is at 2005 delegates. 20   more &#38; he reaches the 2025 needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Michigan offering the 69 59 split, add in 34% of the Flordia delegates, Obama is at 2005 delegates. 20   more &amp; he reaches the 2025 needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138389</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138389</guid>
		<description>http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_evelyn_p_080512_curtain_time_for_bar.htm

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_evelyn_p_080513_curtain_time_for_bar.htm

Thats why I will NEVER vote for Obama! Any one who claims he is totally innocent has their head somewhere, and I don't mean in the sand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_evelyn_p_080512_curtain_time_for_bar.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_evelyn_p_080512_curtain_time_for_bar.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_evelyn_p_080513_curtain_time_for_bar.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_evelyn_p_080513_curtain_time_for_bar.htm</a></p>
<p>Thats why I will NEVER vote for Obama! Any one who claims he is totally innocent has their head somewhere, and I don&#8217;t mean in the sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Trail Dog</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138365</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Trail Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138365</guid>
		<description>TO FUNNY - You call the Kennedys, Kerrys, Deans, Richardsons, Pelosi's, Rev Otis Moss, Rev. Wright, Prophet Rapper Shakur having a more inside knowledge than what we the people that voted their sorry donkey rears into office have.  Where did you come up with this knowledge.  I thought they did away with outhouse's long ago when we got indoor plumbing.  You must be living in the shadows of some of those mounds.  Because Bro. you sure don't have a clue as to what's taking place in this world today.  Neither does your man OBAMA.  You talk about a fish out of water trying to run the biggest country in the free world.  WELL WATCH REAL CLOSE AS IT CRUMBLES AWAY IF THIS MAN SHOULD GAIN THE OVAL OFFICE.  Then Dear Funny.  YOU WILL BE A STINKING LAUGHING JOKE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO FUNNY - You call the Kennedys, Kerrys, Deans, Richardsons, Pelosi&#8217;s, Rev Otis Moss, Rev. Wright, Prophet Rapper Shakur having a more inside knowledge than what we the people that voted their sorry donkey rears into office have.  Where did you come up with this knowledge.  I thought they did away with outhouse&#8217;s long ago when we got indoor plumbing.  You must be living in the shadows of some of those mounds.  Because Bro. you sure don&#8217;t have a clue as to what&#8217;s taking place in this world today.  Neither does your man OBAMA.  You talk about a fish out of water trying to run the biggest country in the free world.  WELL WATCH REAL CLOSE AS IT CRUMBLES AWAY IF THIS MAN SHOULD GAIN THE OVAL OFFICE.  Then Dear Funny.  YOU WILL BE A STINKING LAUGHING JOKE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Lee</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138345</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138345</guid>
		<description>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass_bd11may11,0,4134722.column
Obama magically unstained by grime of Chicago Way  by John Kass May 11, 2008 

I think the May 11th commentary by John Kass in the Chicago Tribune sums up the so called reformer platform of Obama.  

Why would the Dems support a candidate that never reformed anything in his own back yard?  Puppet politics is why.  Just do as the leaders of the party want regardless.  Flash and charm will be more of an asset than actual experience and integrity.  

Last thing we need is Chicago politics in the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass_bd11may11,0,4134722.column" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass_bd11may11,0,4134722.column</a><br />
Obama magically unstained by grime of Chicago Way  by John Kass May 11, 2008 </p>
<p>I think the May 11th commentary by John Kass in the Chicago Tribune sums up the so called reformer platform of Obama.  </p>
<p>Why would the Dems support a candidate that never reformed anything in his own back yard?  Puppet politics is why.  Just do as the leaders of the party want regardless.  Flash and charm will be more of an asset than actual experience and integrity.  </p>
<p>Last thing we need is Chicago politics in the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Lee</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138343</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138343</guid>
		<description>I think the May 11th commentary by John Kass in the Chicago Tribune sums up the so called reformer platform of Obama.  

Why would the Dems support a candidate that never reformed anything in his own back yard?  Puppet politics is why.  Just do as the leaders of the party want regardless.  Flash and charm will be more of an asset than actual experience and integrity.  

Last thing we need is Chicago politics in the White House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the May 11th commentary by John Kass in the Chicago Tribune sums up the so called reformer platform of Obama.  </p>
<p>Why would the Dems support a candidate that never reformed anything in his own back yard?  Puppet politics is why.  Just do as the leaders of the party want regardless.  Flash and charm will be more of an asset than actual experience and integrity.  </p>
<p>Last thing we need is Chicago politics in the White House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NO NEED TO ARGUE</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/12/obama-overtakes-clinton-in-superdelegate-race/#comment-138341</link>
		<dc:creator>NO NEED TO ARGUE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=2234#comment-138341</guid>
		<description>YOU GUYS, YOU DON'T NEED TO ARGUE ANYMORE  BECAUSE EVERYONE ALREADY MADE UP THEIR MIND TO VOTE ON NOV. 

YES, ANSWER IS MCCAIN...

HE IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

OBAMA WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF KANYA.



EVERYTHING WILL BE SETTLE.

THE END.

MCCAIN 08'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU GUYS, YOU DON&#8217;T NEED TO ARGUE ANYMORE  BECAUSE EVERYONE ALREADY MADE UP THEIR MIND TO VOTE ON NOV. </p>
<p>YES, ANSWER IS MCCAIN&#8230;</p>
<p>HE IS THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.</p>
<p>OBAMA WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF KANYA.</p>
<p>EVERYTHING WILL BE SETTLE.</p>
<p>THE END.</p>
<p>MCCAIN 08&#8242;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
