<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Releases 2007 Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff X</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-96843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-96843</guid>
		<description>Comment by nazcalito
April 17th, 2008 at 5:15 pm

EJ, you should look at the actual returns first before you say that Michelle Obama is hiding “earned income” What the article is calling “earned income” is W-2 income and you can’t hide that, the employer sends in the W-2, and why would you want to, the taxes are already taken out. Anything not on the W-2 if not interest or capital gains type of stuff is business income. Michelle’s business income was $29,443 as a director and the company would have sent in a 1099 on that. I remember some goofy information circulating that she made $200,000 as a director of something and that’s apparently not true. Salary for a US senator is $169300 per year, so Michelle’s salary was 91,435.
___________________________________________________________________________________

Wow, only 91K, no wonder she wasn't proud of America until her hubby was running for President. Now they can go from "rags" to riches like the Clintons did if he becomes President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by nazcalito<br />
April 17th, 2008 at 5:15 pm</p>
<p>EJ, you should look at the actual returns first before you say that Michelle Obama is hiding “earned income” What the article is calling “earned income” is W-2 income and you can’t hide that, the employer sends in the W-2, and why would you want to, the taxes are already taken out. Anything not on the W-2 if not interest or capital gains type of stuff is business income. Michelle’s business income was $29,443 as a director and the company would have sent in a 1099 on that. I remember some goofy information circulating that she made $200,000 as a director of something and that’s apparently not true. Salary for a US senator is $169300 per year, so Michelle’s salary was 91,435.<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Wow, only 91K, no wonder she wasn&#8217;t proud of America until her hubby was running for President. Now they can go from &#8220;rags&#8221; to riches like the Clintons did if he becomes President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nazcalito</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-96209</link>
		<dc:creator>nazcalito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-96209</guid>
		<description>EJ, you should look at the actual returns first before you say that Michelle Obama is hiding "earned income"  What the article is calling "earned income" is W-2 income and you can't hide that, the employer sends in the W-2, and why would you want to, the taxes are already taken out.  Anything not on the W-2 if not interest or capital gains type of stuff is business income.  Michelle's business income was $29,443 as a director and the company would have sent in a 1099 on that.  I remember some goofy information circulating that she made $200,000 as a director of something and that's apparently not true.  Salary for a US senator is $169300 per year, so Michelle's salary was 91,435.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EJ, you should look at the actual returns first before you say that Michelle Obama is hiding &#8220;earned income&#8221;  What the article is calling &#8220;earned income&#8221; is W-2 income and you can&#8217;t hide that, the employer sends in the W-2, and why would you want to, the taxes are already taken out.  Anything not on the W-2 if not interest or capital gains type of stuff is business income.  Michelle&#8217;s business income was $29,443 as a director and the company would have sent in a 1099 on that.  I remember some goofy information circulating that she made $200,000 as a director of something and that&#8217;s apparently not true.  Salary for a US senator is $169300 per year, so Michelle&#8217;s salary was 91,435.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frodo Baggins to ari</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-96127</link>
		<dc:creator>Frodo Baggins to ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-96127</guid>
		<description>Jeez, I hope you and the other Obama supporters are sitting down.

I'll use Rasmussen Polls only since you seem to like them best.

Nationally Latest Rasmussen Poll 4/16/08 has it McCain 47 Obama 43. this poll is of course worthless because it reflects the popular vote. Electorial Votes are what counts.

Florida Latest Rasmussen Poll 4/10/08 has it mcCain 53 Obama 38.

Ohio Latest Rasmussen Poll 4/8/08 has it mcCain 47 Obama 40.

Florida by 15 points and Ohio by 7 points. 

Lose either one of these states and you are not going to win. 

the only stradegy that makes any sense is for obama to start blaming hillart and labeling the voters of these two states racists. He's managed to beat hillary using this method, why stop now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, I hope you and the other Obama supporters are sitting down.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll use Rasmussen Polls only since you seem to like them best.</p>
<p>Nationally Latest Rasmussen Poll 4/16/08 has it McCain 47 Obama 43. this poll is of course worthless because it reflects the popular vote. Electorial Votes are what counts.</p>
<p>Florida Latest Rasmussen Poll 4/10/08 has it mcCain 53 Obama 38.</p>
<p>Ohio Latest Rasmussen Poll 4/8/08 has it mcCain 47 Obama 40.</p>
<p>Florida by 15 points and Ohio by 7 points. </p>
<p>Lose either one of these states and you are not going to win. </p>
<p>the only stradegy that makes any sense is for obama to start blaming hillart and labeling the voters of these two states racists. He&#8217;s managed to beat hillary using this method, why stop now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frodo Baggins to ari</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-96080</link>
		<dc:creator>Frodo Baggins to ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-96080</guid>
		<description>You missed a couple of Rasmussen Polls

4/16/08 Nationally McCain 47 Obama 43

4/8/08 Ohio McCain 47 Obama 40

4/10/08 Florida McCain 51 Obama 38

You weren't trying to be a little deceptive, were you?

Obama losing Ohio and Florida wouldn't be such a big deal, huh?

All of these are the latest Rasmussen Polls for the respective areas. All verifiable on Rasmussen's website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed a couple of Rasmussen Polls</p>
<p>4/16/08 Nationally McCain 47 Obama 43</p>
<p>4/8/08 Ohio McCain 47 Obama 40</p>
<p>4/10/08 Florida McCain 51 Obama 38</p>
<p>You weren&#8217;t trying to be a little deceptive, were you?</p>
<p>Obama losing Ohio and Florida wouldn&#8217;t be such a big deal, huh?</p>
<p>All of these are the latest Rasmussen Polls for the respective areas. All verifiable on Rasmussen&#8217;s website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern girl</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-95964</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-95964</guid>
		<description>Who were all the idiots that bought his book? I would take it back for a refund!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who were all the idiots that bought his book? I would take it back for a refund!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GOD</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-95962</link>
		<dc:creator>GOD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-95962</guid>
		<description>TO TEL THANK'S  .GOD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TO TEL THANK&#8217;S  .GOD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tel...</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-95952</link>
		<dc:creator>Tel...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-95952</guid>
		<description>Comment by ari 
April 17th, 2008 at 12:34 pm Obama is doing fine, eventhough was not at his best yesterday. More a gossip shpw than politics, plus found Hillary too much referring to President Clinton’s years, you should emphasize your strenghts, and the fact she was not clear about social security, and just in general how to raise revenue, will figuere something out, if by now you haven’t then no point of running.Obama found the most realist, just plain and simple, and moderators were not very good. Like old quasy Prof. and intern asking some ‘tough’ questions.


.......................................................................


Obama was asked point blank why he doesn't wear a flag pin. He deflected by saying he reveres the flag...this is distraction, let's discuss the issues. He didn't answer the question although he has stated why in the past. 

Obama was asked whether an attack on Israel is an attack on the US. He offered, Israel is an ally...Iran should understand...no option is off the table..in essence, non-commital deflection. By contrast Hillary was quite explicit. An attack on Israel by Iran would be met with severe reciprocation. 

When issues were brought up...Obama was asked about no new taxes. He said not only no new taxes but tax cuts to the middle class. Then capital gains was brought up. Obama in fact implied there would be new taxes. He also was offered, that when capital gains tax was decreased, revenue went up. Obama (and this was a hoot) said this time it would be different. Why?..he had no answer, and his earning threshhold fluctuated from 90,000 to 250,000. He was caught out. Hillary (wrongly) said NO NEW TAXES point blank. 


Why do you carry water for this guy Ari?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by ari<br />
April 17th, 2008 at 12:34 pm Obama is doing fine, eventhough was not at his best yesterday. More a gossip shpw than politics, plus found Hillary too much referring to President Clinton’s years, you should emphasize your strenghts, and the fact she was not clear about social security, and just in general how to raise revenue, will figuere something out, if by now you haven’t then no point of running.Obama found the most realist, just plain and simple, and moderators were not very good. Like old quasy Prof. and intern asking some ‘tough’ questions.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Obama was asked point blank why he doesn&#8217;t wear a flag pin. He deflected by saying he reveres the flag&#8230;this is distraction, let&#8217;s discuss the issues. He didn&#8217;t answer the question although he has stated why in the past. </p>
<p>Obama was asked whether an attack on Israel is an attack on the US. He offered, Israel is an ally&#8230;Iran should understand&#8230;no option is off the table..in essence, non-commital deflection. By contrast Hillary was quite explicit. An attack on Israel by Iran would be met with severe reciprocation. </p>
<p>When issues were brought up&#8230;Obama was asked about no new taxes. He said not only no new taxes but tax cuts to the middle class. Then capital gains was brought up. Obama in fact implied there would be new taxes. He also was offered, that when capital gains tax was decreased, revenue went up. Obama (and this was a hoot) said this time it would be different. Why?..he had no answer, and his earning threshhold fluctuated from 90,000 to 250,000. He was caught out. Hillary (wrongly) said NO NEW TAXES point blank. </p>
<p>Why do you carry water for this guy Ari?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GOD</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-95950</link>
		<dc:creator>GOD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-95950</guid>
		<description>HILLARY WIN'S PA  63% TO BARACK'S 37%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HILLARY WIN&#8217;S PA  63% TO BARACK&#8217;S 37%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: client#8</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-95943</link>
		<dc:creator>client#8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-95943</guid>
		<description>obama needs to put his money where his mouth is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama needs to put his money where his mouth is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: client#8</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/04/16/obama-releases-2007-taxes/#comment-95938</link>
		<dc:creator>client#8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1989#comment-95938</guid>
		<description>obombyomama paid 33% of his income in fed taxes----thank God for bush's tax cuts, it allowed obama more money to circulate into the economy.

obama gave just under 6% to charities.....doesn't come close to the clinton's 10%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obombyomama paid 33% of his income in fed taxes&#8212;-thank God for bush&#8217;s tax cuts, it allowed obama more money to circulate into the economy.</p>
<p>obama gave just under 6% to charities&#8230;..doesn&#8217;t come close to the clinton&#8217;s 10%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
