Hillary has all the right in the world to question Obama. When Obama spewed his condescending remarks to all those millionaires in San Francisco he directly accused the Clinton administration for “small town folks” clinging to religion and guns. If he accuses the Clinton years as the reason for their bitterness then why shouldn’t Hillary strike back? WHY? She kept quiet when the Wright controversy erupted. She made only one comment. “Wright would not be my pastor.” That was it. But this “bitter/clinging” issue is pure politics, it’s about policy, honesty. Its goes straight to the reason why democrats have lost the last two elections. It is fair to argue Obama’s condescension to the small town folk because it goes directly to issues like religion, xenophobia, gun ownership and culture.

DO YOU THINK GEOFF DAVIS’S COMMENT SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED MORE CLOSELY?

Geoff Davis made the comments at a state party dinner Saturday.
After referring to Obama as a “snake-oil salesman,” he added that he had recently participated in a “highly classified, national security simulation” with the Illinois senator.
“I’m going to tell you something: That boy’s finger does not need to be on the button,” said Davis. “He could not make a decision in that simulation that related to a nuclear threat to this country.”

WOW……….If Obama had participated in a highly classified national security simulation and he

failed miserably, we need to know about his level of competence and analytical abilities; and I

would suggest that Mr. Davis reference that boy finger means Obama is probably to young and

still a puerile, some men never grow up, we all know the type we call them the Peter Pan

syndrome

I WOULD LIKE TO SEE AN AD ASKING DOES OBAMA HAVE THE COMPETENCE AND THE BALLS TO BE OUR COMMANDER IN CHIEF…. I THINK NOT

HILLARY R. CLINTON PRESIDENT OF AMERICA 2009-2012

Don’t know how many Fox viewers are like me, but I watch because I am mesmerised by their sheer gall. I loathe the mothers and would be nearly as aghast if they were pushing from the other side of the political divide.

Everything down to the most minute detail is framed to accentuate the positive about Republicans and the negative about Democrats, and it is all done with a straight face.

Look at the cynical way they choose their ‘house ni**ers’ to be the most strident rightist spokespeople. Not saying that these individuals are not genuine in their beliefs, but the fact that they are chosen primarily because they can communicate the stock messages from behind a black face must make them feel more than a little used and abused.

Even if, as they constantly allege, there is ‘left-wing bias’ in what they refer to as the mainstream media (I think fairness bias would be more accurate), it is no excuse whatsoever for Fox’s frontpeople to make their bias so screamingly obvious. You just should not see an interviewer nodding and agreeing with their subject, or asking patsy questions like ‘Does Barack really hate America or is he just unpatriotic?’

Goebbels would be proud of the ‘fair and balanced’ BS. I hope the ‘mainstream media’ is quietly building up a blacklist of Fox’s front-puppets and producers. These people have sold out on every journalistic principle there is - and should never be employed again.

If those two people actually beleive that Hills has been fighting for them their her whole life they really need a reality check. Its just another half truth from the campaign. Once Hills i done helping everryone who paid for Billys library and tha 109million of salary she’ll get around to helping you out.

Bill Clinton said “The reason (George H. W. Bush’s tactic) works so well now is that you have all these economically insecure white people who are scared to death,” Clinton was quoted saying by the Los Angeles Times in September 1991.

http://digg.com/politics/B_Clinton_disadvantaged_white_people_are_scared_to_death

HELL YES I AM BITTER. At the DNC for leting Barack keep up his Bullsh*t. Time for them to boot his a$$. Or John McCain will WIN…. But that is OK just not ‘barack nobama’. What the hell will I be next week?

What do you call Olbermann’s nightly scr0tum licking of Obama?

I am fed up with listening to the Elitist Rhetoric spewing from Obama’s mouth, and the Bitter Racial Diatribe from his wife Michelle. There is something she should be proud of. She should be proud that she is free to purchase tickets (4) to any country in the world she desires (preferably Africa). May there, she can find something she can be Really Proud of.

WELL HOWDY,, YEAH IT’S ME,,,REDNECK WOMAN,, I live in a SMALL TOWN,, I OWN A GUN,, I AM A DANG GOOD SHOT TOO,, yeah I believe in GOD,, got a pick up truck too,, and I had ALL this ,,a heck of a long time before OBAMA EVER came on the seen,,, and I will have MY GUN, MY SMALL TOWN,,AND MY FAITH,, AFTER barry barack HUSSIEN obama is LONGGGGGG GONE!!!! I LOVE MY TRUCK

why are people not being intelligent? Can people not see why hillary is so desparate to do or say anything? She lies all the time and can people not see this? why would any straight thinking person think otherwise. It really amazes me the way people see things.

B.O. is a DIPWAD SNOB!!!!!!!!

YES I AM BITTER AT THE DNC FOR NOT STOPING ‘barack nobama’ He can call people any thing and that is OK. No it is not. I am white and mad as hell…’barack nobama is a racist and that is no lie. If not the DNC can thank them self’s for JOHN MCCAIN’s WIN. But that is OK. Just not ‘barack.

This comment section is disgusting, almost as much as Hillary’s commercial is.

Hillary is so much more natural as a Republican.

Corporate America is getting scared.

Comment by McKeebop:

“it is no excuse whatsoever for Fox’s frontpeople to make their bias so screamingly obvious. You just should not see an interviewer nodding and agreeing with their subject, or asking patsy questions like ‘Does Barack really hate America or is he just unpatriotic?’

Goebbels would be proud of the ‘fair and balanced’ BS. I hope the ‘mainstream media’ is quietly building up a blacklist of Fox’s front-puppets and producers. These people have sold out on every journalistic principle there is - and should never be employed again.”

_________________________________________________________________________

Guy, are you kidding me? balance is the reason that Hannity has Colmes on. The last time I watched the show I didn’t walk away with the feeling that Colmes carries the torch for Barry Goldwater or Ronny Reagan.

What I believe is the problem you have is that you are so use to watching shows and news programs over the past 20 years who were so unbalanced their liberal bias against conservatives and families, that when you actually watch a balanced news show such as what FOX produces which brings true balance to the table, you, Mr. McKeebop come away thinking that its some lunatic, right wing conspiracy. You see, you were weened on poisonois liberal, rotten milk. Now you have conservative milk fortified with protein.

Welcome to the conservative shift in the media back to more in the middle. How do you think we felt out here when there was absolutely no balance for years?

You can thank the Internet creator (Al Gore I believe I was told who created the Internet) for allowing people outside of the leftist press to play in the same game. You do not seem too happy that your leftist friends such as CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS no longer have the tight reigns of control over America’s media outlets any longer. You must be upside down that Fox News is the most watched news channel in the United States now.

Sorry there champ but its time that you start getting use to the reality check because true conservatives had to beat their heads against the TV too long waiting for the shift to take place, and thank God it did!

Now go beat your head against your television set please and report back to me in one month.

Yeah we cling to our beliefs,in God and do like our guns for the purpose of hunting and sport shooting,and most of us choose to stay that way rather to bow to the Harvard educated mindset that permeates marxism……maybe Obama needs to drop out,as he’s as unAmerican as you can get…Our country Mr Obama was built on our belief in a Honest and just God,and on our constitutional right to our guns…….It sounds to me that all the sweet talking is finally starting to show the real man behind the face…When He,the master of “the Gift of Gab” has to resort to “maybe I used the wrong words”,then He has nothing to say to we the Bitter paople in the small towns,of Pa…..He’s not old enough,or educated enough to know that it was we in the small towns of this State that worked to keep the rear ends of his Parents,and His Pastor warm,with a nice Coal fire,for yrs and yrs.Well I’m old fashioned and don’t need to hear how Bitter I am,especially coming from a Marxist point of view

barack nobama is a glump of sh*t. He can kiss my? Rich white bitter typical a$$. So if not HILLARY. Then McCain. That is OK with me. Just not ‘barack nobama. What will I be next week? B.rock

Once again Hillary is showing her pathetic phony nature….here is how she really feels about guns!!

Monday, January 22, 2007
Hillary Clinton’s Anti-Gun Agenda

Washington, DC (TLS). The following facts were gleaned from various news sources over a period of years. The subject matter is Hillary Clinton’s views on guns. As the following examples will show, Hillary falls within the camp of ‘anti-gun bigots,’ those who would blame firearms, not the evil deeds of wayward human beings, for every example of violence in the nation.

For this reason, Hillary has received a grade of ‘F-’ from Gun Owners of
America.

As you will see below, Hillary Clinton favors a national database of registered gun owners–the very same tactic the Nazis used in Germany prior to taking over the country and confiscating guns. In addition, rather than pointing to the obvious logical conclusion that the violence of Columbine could have been stopped cold had teachers and school administrators been armed, Hillary instead seeks to tighten gun control measures.

‘Hillary Rodham Clinton offered her support for a legislative proposal to license hand guns. The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Charles Schumer, would require anyone who wants to purchase a gun to obtain a state-issued photo gun license. “I stand in support of this common sense legislation to license everyone who wishes to purchase a gun,” Clinton said. “I also believe that every new handgun sale or transfer should be registered in a national registry, such as Chuck is proposing.”’
Source: CNN.com Jun 2, 2000

‘A month after the Columbine shootings, Bill & I went to Littleton Colorado to visit with the families of victims & survivors. The Columbine tragedy was not the first, nor the last, episode involving gun violence at an American high school. But it ignited a call for more federal action to keep guns out of the hands of the violent, troubled and young–a lethal combination. Bill and I announced a proposal to raise the legal age of handgun ownership to 21, and limit purchases of handguns to one per month.’
Source: Living History, by Hillary Rodham Clinton, p. 503-4 Nov 1, 2003

‘We have to do everything possible to keep guns out of the hands of children, and we need to stand firm on behalf of the sensible gun control legislation that passed the Senate and then was watered down in the House. It does not make sense for us at this point in our history to turn our backs on the reality that there are too many guns and too many children have access to those guns-and we have to act to prevent that.’
Source: Remarks to NEA in Orlando, Florida Jul 5, 1999

Hillary Clinton voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers.

‘A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. Voting YES would:

‘Exempt lawsuits brought against individuals who knowingly transfer a firearm that will be used to commit a violent or drug-trafficking crime

‘Exempt lawsuits against actions that result in death, physical injury or property damage due solely to a product defect

‘Call for the dismissal of all qualified civil liability actions pending on the date of enactment by the court in which the action was brought

‘Prohibit the manufacture, import, sale or delivery of armor piercing ammunition, and sets a minimum prison term of 15 years for violations

‘Require all licensed importers, manufacturers and dealers who engage in the transfer of handguns to provide secure gun storage or safety devices.’
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S 397 ; vote number 2005-219 on Jul 29, 2005

Hillary Clinton voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence.

‘The bill would block certain civil lawsuits against manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers of firearms and ammunition, mainly those lawsuits aimed at making them liable for gun violence. In this bill, trade groups would also be protected. The bill would call for the dismissal of pending lawsuits against the gun industry. The exception would be lawsuits regarding a defect in a weapon or ammunition. It also would provide a 10-year reauthorization of the assault weapons ban which is set to expire in September 2004. The bill would increase the penalties for gun-related violent or drug trafficking crimes which have not resulted in death, to a minimum of 15 years imprisonment. The bill calls for criminal background checks on all firearm transactions at gun shows where at least 75 guns are sold. Exemptions would be made available for dealers selling guns from their homes as well as members-only gun swaps and meets carried out by nonprofit hunting clubs.’
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S.1805/H.R.1036 ; vote number 2004-30 on Mar 2, 2004

As you can see from the record, Hillary Rodham Clinton is an avowed anti-gun bigot who believes ‘there are too many guns.’ That statement alone is ample proof that her theory, when carried to its logical conclusion, is based upon the premise that we must reduce the number of guns in society, since there are too many. The practical outgrowth of this premise is ominous. The only way one can reduce the number of guns in society is to enact extreme measures that violate the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In other words, the right to own and bear arms must be abridged, limited, and violated–in direct contradiction to the Constitution which states that such a right shall NOT be abridged.

It is no surprise that Clinton and her comrades in today’s Democrat Party seek to rob citizens of their Constitutional rights. And, as I have warned before on The Liberty Sphere, if they can go after our gun rights, there is no reason to believe they won’t go after our FIRST Amendment rights as well.

Sadly, this is precisely what happened as the Democrat-controlled Senate attempted to silence free speech with a silly and oppressive attempt to stop citizens from urging each other to contact Congress concerning pending legislation. Hillary Clinton voted against free speech rights in this regard, thus placing her on The Liberty Sphere’s Blacklist of Senate Traitors.

Thus, the war on gun rights is merely a symptom of a broader war–the war on liberty. And Hillary Clinton is one of the Generals in that war.

Once again Hillary shows the lovely phony side of herself-how dumb does she think we are?!

Monday, January 22, 2007
Hillary Clinton’s Anti-Gun Agenda
Washington, DC (TLS). The following facts were gleaned from various news sources over a period of years. The subject matter is Hillary Clinton’s views on guns. As the following examples will show, Hillary falls within the camp of ‘anti-gun bigots,’ those who would blame firearms, not the evil deeds of wayward human beings, for every example of violence in the nation.

For this reason, Hillary has received a grade of ‘F-’ from Gun Owners of America.

As you will see below, Hillary Clinton favors a national database of registered gun owners–the very same tactic the Nazis used in Germany prior to taking over the country and confiscating guns. In addition, rather than pointing to the obvious logical conclusion that the violence of Columbine could have been stopped cold had teachers and school administrators been armed, Hillary instead seeks to tighten gun control measures.

‘Hillary Rodham Clinton offered her support for a legislative proposal to license hand guns. The legislation, sponsored by Sen. Charles Schumer, would require anyone who wants to purchase a gun to obtain a state-issued photo gun license. “I stand in support of this common sense legislation to license everyone who wishes to purchase a gun,” Clinton said. “I also believe that every new handgun sale or transfer should be registered in a national registry, such as Chuck is proposing.”’
Source: CNN.com Jun 2, 2000

‘A month after the Columbine shootings, Bill & I went to Littleton Colorado to visit with the families of victims & survivors. The Columbine tragedy was not the first, nor the last, episode involving gun violence at an American high school. But it ignited a call for more federal action to keep guns out of the hands of the violent, troubled and young–a lethal combination. Bill and I announced a proposal to raise the legal age of handgun ownership to 21, and limit purchases of handguns to one per month.’
Source: Living History, by Hillary Rodham Clinton, p. 503-4 Nov 1, 2003

‘We have to do everything possible to keep guns out of the hands of children, and we need to stand firm on behalf of the sensible gun control legislation that passed the Senate and then was watered down in the House. It does not make sense for us at this point in our history to turn our backs on the reality that there are too many guns and too many children have access to those guns-and we have to act to prevent that.’
Source: Remarks to NEA in Orlando, Florida Jul 5, 1999

Hillary Clinton voted NO on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers.

‘A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. Voting YES would:

‘Exempt lawsuits brought against individuals who knowingly transfer a firearm that will be used to commit a violent or drug-trafficking crime

‘Exempt lawsuits against actions that result in death, physical injury or property damage due solely to a product defect

‘Call for the dismissal of all qualified civil liability actions pending on the date of enactment by the court in which the action was brought

‘Prohibit the manufacture, import, sale or delivery of armor piercing ammunition, and sets a minimum prison term of 15 years for violations

‘Require all licensed importers, manufacturers and dealers who engage in the transfer of handguns to provide secure gun storage or safety devices.’
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S 397 ; vote number 2005-219 on Jul 29, 2005

Hillary Clinton voted NO on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence.

‘The bill would block certain civil lawsuits against manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers of firearms and ammunition, mainly those lawsuits aimed at making them liable for gun violence. In this bill, trade groups would also be protected. The bill would call for the dismissal of pending lawsuits against the gun industry. The exception would be lawsuits regarding a defect in a weapon or ammunition. It also would provide a 10-year reauthorization of the assault weapons ban which is set to expire in September 2004. The bill would increase the penalties for gun-related violent or drug trafficking crimes which have not resulted in death, to a minimum of 15 years imprisonment. The bill calls for criminal background checks on all firearm transactions at gun shows where at least 75 guns are sold. Exemptions would be made available for dealers selling guns from their homes as well as members-only gun swaps and meets carried out by nonprofit hunting clubs.’
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S.1805/H.R.1036 ; vote number 2004-30 on Mar 2, 2004

As you can see from the record, Hillary Rodham Clinton is an avowed anti-gun bigot who believes ‘there are too many guns.’ That statement alone is ample proof that her theory, when carried to its logical conclusion, is based upon the premise that we must reduce the number of guns in society, since there are too many. The practical outgrowth of this premise is ominous. The only way one can reduce the number of guns in society is to enact extreme measures that violate the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In other words, the right to own and bear arms must be abridged, limited, and violated–in direct contradiction to the Constitution which states that such a right shall NOT be abridged.

It is no surprise that Clinton and her comrades in today’s Democrat Party seek to rob citizens of their Constitutional rights. And, as I have warned before on The Liberty Sphere, if they can go after our gun rights, there is no reason to believe they won’t go after our FIRST Amendment rights as well.

Sadly, this is precisely what happened as the Democrat-controlled Senate attempted to silence free speech with a silly and oppressive attempt to stop citizens from urging each other to contact Congress concerning pending legislation. Hillary Clinton voted against free speech rights in this regard, thus placing her on The Liberty Sphere’s Blacklist of Senate Traitors.

Thus, the war on gun rights is merely a symptom of a broader war–the war on liberty. And Hillary Clinton is one of the Generals in that war.

Rezko Trial Update:

CHICAGO - The government’s star witness at the fraud trial of political fundraiser Antoin “Tony” Rezko testified today that he attended a party for a British billionaire at Rezko’s home, where Sen. Barack Obama and his wife also were among the guests.

Attorney Stuart Levine testified that the party took place in April 2004 and was held to honor Iraqi-born, London-based billionaire Nadhmi Auchi, who was visiting the United States at the time.

Rezko, 52, was a major fundraiser for Obama and Gov. Rod Blagojevich, and the trial has been closely watched because of Obama’s presidential campaign. But very little has been said about the senator thus far.
__________________________________________________

It’s only a matter of time………………………..

MY FELLOW BITTER, STUPID, WORKING CLASS PEOPLE.

YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT, TOO

If you think like Barack Obama, that WORKING CLASS PEOPLE are just a bunch of BITTER!, STUPID, PEASANTS, Cash COWS!, and CANNON FODDER.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that Obama with no experience can fix an economy on the verge of collapse better than Hillary Clinton. Whose husband (Bill Clinton) led the greatest economic expansion, and prosperity in American history.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that Obama with no experience fighting for universal health care can get it for you better than Hillary Clinton. Who anticipated this current health care crisis back in 1993, and fought a pitched battle against overwhelming odds to get universal health care for all the American people.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that Obama with no experience can manage, and get us out of two wars better than Hillary Clinton. Whose husband (Bill Clinton) went to war only when he was convinced that he absolutely had to. Then completed the mission in record time against a nuclear power. AND DID NOT LOSE THE LIFE OF A SINGLE AMERICAN SOLDIER. NOT ONE!

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that Obama with no experience saving the environment is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose husband (Bill Clinton) left office with the greatest amount of environmental cleanup, and protections in American history.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that Obama with little or no education experience is better than Hillary Clinton. Whose husband (Bill Clinton) made higher education affordable for every American. And created higher job demand and starting salary’s than they had ever been before or since.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that Obama with no experience will be better than Hillary Clinton who spent 8 years at the right hand of President Bill Clinton. Who is already on record as one of the greatest Presidents in American history.

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think that you can change the way Washington works with pretty speeches from Obama, rather than with the experience, and political expertise of two master politicians ON YOUR SIDE like Hillary and Bill Clinton..

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

If you think all those Republicans voting for Obama in the Democratic primaries, and caucuses are doing so because they think he is a stronger Democratic candidate than Hillary Clinton.

Best regards

jacksmith…

p.s.

If you don’t know that the huge amounts of money funding the Obama campaign to try and defeat Hillary Clinton is coming in from the insurance, and medical industry, that has been ripping you off, and killing you and your children. And denying you, and your loved ones the life saving medical care you needed. All just so they can make more huge immoral profits for them-selves off of your suffering…

You Might Be An Idiot, Too!

You see, back in 1993 Hillary Clinton had the audacity, and nerve to try and get quality, affordable universal health care for everyone to prevent the suffering and needless deaths of hundreds of thousands of you each year.

Approx. 100,000 of you die each year from medical accidents from a rush to profit by the insurance, and medical industry. Another 120,000 of you die each year from treatable illness that people in other developed countries don’t die from. And I could go on, and on…

DON’T BE DUPED !!!

Large numbers of Republicans have been voting for Barack Obama in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses from early on. Because they feel he would be a weaker opponent against John McCain. With Hillary Clinton you are almost 100% certain to get quality, affordable universal health care very soon.

But first, all of you have to make certain that Hillary Clinton takes the democratic nomination and then the Whitehouse. NOW! is the time. THIS! is the moment you have all been working, and waiting for. You can do this America. “Carpe diem” (harvest the day).

I think Hillary Clinton see’s a beautiful world of plenty for all. She’s a woman, and a mother. And it’s time America. Do this for your-selves, and your children’s future. You will have to work together on this and be aggressive, relentless, and creative. Americans face an even worse catastrophe ahead than the one you are living through now.

You see, the medical and insurance industry mostly support the republicans with the money they ripped off from you. And they don’t want you to have quality, affordable universal health care. They want to be able to continue to rip you off, and kill you and your children by continuing to deny you life saving medical care that you have already paid for. So they can continue to make more immoral profits for them-selves.

Hillary Clinton has actually won by much larger margins than the vote totals showed. And lost by much smaller vote margins than the vote totals showed. Her delegate count is actually much higher than it shows. And higher than Obama’s. She also leads in the electoral college numbers that you must win to become President in the November national election. HILLARY CLINTON IS ALREADY THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!

As much as 30% of Obama’s primary, and caucus votes are Republicans trying to choose the weakest democratic candidate for McCain to run against. These Republicans have been gaming the caucuses where it is easier to vote cheat. This is why Obama has not been able to win the BIG! states primaries. Even with Republican vote cheating help.

Hillary Clinton has been OUT MANNED! OUT GUNNED! and OUT SPENT! 4 and 5 to 1. Yet Obama has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie with Hillary Clinton.

If Obama is the democratic nominee for the national election in November he will be slaughtered. Because the Republican vote cheating help will suddenly evaporate. All of this vote fraud and republican manipulation has made Obama falsely look like a much stronger candidate than he really is. YOUNG PEOPLE. DON’T BE DUPED! Think about it. You have the most to lose.

The democratic party needs to fix this outrage. Everyone needs to throw all your support to Hillary Clinton NOW! So you can end this outrage against YOU the voter, and against democracy.
The democratic party, and the super-delegates have a decision to make. Are the democrats, and the democratic party going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee to fight for the American people. Or are the republicans going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee through vote fraud, and gaming the DEMOCRATIC party primaries, and caucuses.

Fortunately the Clinton’s have been able to hold on against this fraudulent outrage with those repeated dramatic comebacks of Hillary Clinton’s. Only the Clinton’s are that resourceful, and strong. Hillary Clinton is your NOMINEE. They are the best I have ever seen.

“This is not a game” (Hillary Clinton)

Sincerely

jacksmith…

SO. barack is an a$$ hole..

We have been called worst names in the past. By Going forward I will make it a goal to never watch FOX news ever again or FOX TV Channel you sound like the GOOD OLD BOYS. Your news appear to be racist and very demeaning to Americans that made this country what it is today by the Grace of GOD. FOX NEWS IS ‘BITTER’ REPORTING.

BUT JUST REMEMBER GOD IS WATCHING AND LISTENING O’Reilly FOX NEWS
What cometh fore from thy mouth so shall it come unto you. God bless you and before you speak ask yourself WWJD what will Jesus do? LOVE THY BROTHER

When Tony Rezko held a reception at his home for Iraqi-born billionaire Nadhmi Auchi on April 3, 2004, White House hopeful Barack Obama and his wife were also there, Stuart Levine testified just now at Rezko’s trial.

Auchi is the man who provided Rezko a $3.5 million loan that Rezko did not disclose to the court — resulting in his January arrest.

“Mr. and Mrs. Obama were there, were they not?” Rezko lawyer Joseph Duffy asked.

“Yes, sir,” Levine said.

Obama and his aides have said Obama has no recollection of ever meeting Auchi. … ..

Obama bomb dropped

When Tony Rezko held a reception at his home for Iraqi-born billionaire Nadhmi Auchi on April 3, 2004, White House hopeful Barack Obama and his wife were also there, Stuart Levine testified just now at Rezko’s trial.

Auchi is the man who provided Rezko a $3.5 million loan that Rezko did not disclose to the court — resulting in his January arrest.

“Mr. and Mrs. Obama were there, were they not?” Rezko lawyer Joseph Duffy asked.

“Yes, sir,” Levine said.

Obama and his aides have said Obama has no recollection of ever meeting Auchi. … ..

Obama bomb dropped

hillary all the way

hillary 08

im still voting for hillary

istill got my gun

hrc 08

Yes people do cling to their religion when times are hard and you’ve reached the bottom no where to go. Where: To God in prayer, men a little different in some ways they may go fishing, hunting a long drive anything to keep from being so frustrated and ‘Bitter’. They have busted there butts and gave there lives for us. Most men came back from WARS one Vietam shell shock, hooked on drugs that our country gave them. You don’t think they are not ‘Bitter’ think again. Mens that left there families because they were to afraid of hurting them.Stop it Fox News the low blows Other countries are watching as well.

pamela how long are you gonna carry on like this………cmon babe get on the hrc train

Sorry Obama this hurt your campaign, however you win the “Elitist” award for stupidty. Montana superdelgate just voted for Hillary “breaking news” I guess that small towns really don’t like it either. Sen. Clinton has gained four superfelgates in the last four days, finally the breaking news states the one about Montana just a a couple of minutes ago “GO HILLARY” Atleast Hillary can admit her mistakes and move on, you lie about them and think you are smarter than the Typical White Person, please note that HIllary takes now a 20 point lead in Pennslyvania over this. I’m hoping you are now glad to be an adult and I just bet you are pissed off over the comments you made to a private forum in California “Yep” and irrogant enough not to apologize for anything “NOTHING” you cram your views with speeches without substance, you going to owe alot of people monies over this way out liberal remarks.

GO HOME OBAMA!!!!!!!!!Sorry Obama this hurt your campaign, however you win the “Elitist” award for stupidty. Montana superdelgate just voted for Hillary “breaking news” I guess that small towns really don’t like it either. I’m sticking to my guns and religion over anything you have to say. Sen. Clinton has gained four superfelgates in the last four days, finally the breaking news states the one about Montana just a a couple of minutes ago “GO HILLARY” Atleast Hillary can admit her mistakes and move on, you lie about them and think you are smarter than the Typical White Person, please note that HIllary takes now a 20 point lead in Pennslyvania over this. I’m hoping you are now glad to be an adult and I just bet you are pissed off over the comments you made to a private forum in California “Yep” and irrogant enough not to apologize for anything “NOTHING” you cram your views with speeches without substance, you going to owe alot of people monies over this way out liberal remarks.

Song of Hillary (9+ / 0-)
Recommended by:Wee Mama, Ekaterin, trashablanca, Cronesense, Horsefeathers, teyigdhk, cultural worker, MAORCA, Terrier Mix
In the wilds of Pennsylvania
Long before she was First Lady
There along small Lake Winola
Surreptitiously came crawling
Little shotgun-toting female
Bloodlust in her eyes agleaming

“Kill the duckies!” Hill would whisper
Stalking in the bone white moonlight
Rising up to shoot triumphant
Yells of joy, then squawks of torment
Dying ducks lay on the water
Blood, a spreading stain upon it
Shores awash with tattered feathers
Shrapneled by Hill’s fatal birdshot

by trivium on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 11:06:50 PM PDT
_________________________

There are some pretty funny people on some different blogs…

Small town people in Pennsylvania are offended!

uote:
ALTOONA, Pa. — While Sen. Barack Obama said he didn’t mean to offend anyone when he made comments about small-town voters last week, voters in the Alleghenies said they may be hardworking, but not “bitter.”

At a fundraiser with donors in California last week, Obama described small-town voters, like those in Pennsylvania, as bitter. He said they’re frustrated with their own economic situation and they cling to issues like guns, religion and immigration. On Saturday, he tried to clarify what he meant.

“There are a whole bunch of folks in Pennsylvania and right here in Indiana, who are bitter. They feel like they’ve been left behind,” said Obama in a town hall meeting in Indiana.

However, the local people who were protesting outside his campaign office in Altoona on Sunday said if that’s what Obama honestly thinks, then he is not their candidate.

“He is definitely out of touch with the voters in Pennsylvania to blaspheme them the way he did,” said Hollidaysburg resident Ted Manna.

Stacey Drugg of Altoona said Obama’s comments showed he did represent working people in Pennsylvania or working people period.

Manna said everyone has their own beliefs, but it shouldn’t be up to a presidential candidate to tell them their beliefs are wrong.

“All the citizens of Pennsylvania should, rightfully so, be upset that he said we hide behind our religion and our guns,” said Manna.

Joseph Antal of Ebensburg said, “With all that’s been happening in our area, and in Johnstown with the flood, we rebound back from adversity.”

The protest was organized by members of various unions in the region. A union member said there were at least five other similar protests across the state on Sunday.
http://www.wjactv.com/news/15871123/detail.html

Below, this a ten point value system, of Obama’s church of 20 years

THE BLACK VALUE SYSTEM

Trinity United Church of Christ adopted the Black Value System, written by the Manford Byrd Recognition Committee, chaired by the late Vallmer Jordan in 1981.

Dr. Manford Byrd, our brother in Christ, withstood the ravage of being denied his earned ascension to the number one position in the Chicago School System. His dedication to the pursuit of excellence, despite systematic denials, has inspired the congregation of Trinity United Church of Christ. Prayerfully, we have called upon the wisdom of all past generations of suffering Blacks for guidance in fashioning an instrument of Black self-determination, the Black Value System.

Beginning in 1982, an annual Black Value System – Educational Scholarship in the name of Dr. Byrd was instituted. The first recipient of the Dr. Manford Byrd Award, which is given annually to the man or woman who best exemplifies the Black Value System, was our brother, Dr. Manford Byrd.

These Black Ethics must be taught and exemplified in homes, churches, nurseries and schools, wherever Blacks are gathered. They consist of the following concepts:

Commitment to God. “The God of our weary years” will give us the strength to give up prayerful passivism and become Black Christian Activists, soldiers for Black freedom and the dignity of all humankind.

Commitment to the Black Community. The highest level of achievement for any Black person must be a contribution of strength and continuity of the Black Community.

Commitment to the Black Family. The Black family circle must generate strength, stability and love, despite the uncertainty of externals, because these characteristics are required if the developing person is to withstand warping by our racist competitive society.

Those Blacks who are blessed with membership in a strong family unit must reach out and expand that blessing to the less fortunate.

Dedication to the Pursuit of Education. We must forswear anti-intellectualism. Continued survival demands that each Black person be developed to the utmost of his/her mental potential despite the inadequacies of the formal education process. “Real education” fosters understanding of ourselves as well as every aspect of our environment. Also, it develops within us the ability to fashion concepts and tools for better utilization of our resources, and more effective solutions to our problems. Since the majority of Blacks have been denied such learning, Black Education must include elements that produce high school graduates with marketable skills, a trade or qualifications for apprenticeships, or proper preparation for college.

Basic education for all Blacks should include Mathematics, Science, Logic, General Semantics, Participative Politics, Economics and Finance, and the Care and Nurture of Black minds.

Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence. To the extent that we individually reach for, even strain for excellence, we increase, geometrically, the value and resourcefulness of the Black Community. We must recognize the relativity of one’s best; this year’s best can be bettered next year. Such is the language of growth and development. We must seek to excel in every endeavor.
Adherence to the Black Work Ethic. “It is becoming harder to find qualified people to work in Chicago.” Whether this is true or not, it represents one of the many reasons given by businesses and industries for deserting the Chicago area. We must realize that a location with good facilities, adequate transportation and a reputation for producing skilled workers will attract industry. We are in competition with other cities, states and nations for jobs. High productivity must be a goal of the Black workforce.

Commitment to Self-Discipline and Self-Respect. To accomplish anything worthwhile requires self-discipline. We must be a community of self-disciplined persons if we are to actualize and utilize our own human resources, instead of perpetually submitting to exploitation by others. Self-discipline, coupled with a respect for self, will enable each of us to be an instrument of Black Progress and a model for Black Youth.

Disavowal of the Pursuit of “Middleclassness.” Classic methodology on control of captives teaches that captors must be able to identify the “talented tenth” of those subjugated, especially those who show promise of providing the kind of leadership that might threaten the captor’s control.

Those so identified are separated from the rest of the people by:

Killing them off directly, and/or fostering a social system that encourages them to kill off one another.
Placing them in concentration camps, and/or structuring an economic environment that induces captive youth to fill the jails and prisons.
Seducing them into a socioeconomic class system which, while training them to earn more dollars, hypnotizes them into believing they are better than others and teaches them to think in terms of “we” and “they” instead of “us.”
So, while it is permissible to chase “middleclassness” with all our might, we must avoid the third separation method – the psychological entrapment of Black “middleclassness.” If we avoid this snare, we will also diminish our “voluntary” contributions to methods A and B. And more importantly, Black people no longer will be deprived of their birthright: the leadership, resourcefulness and example of their own talented persons.

Pledge to Make the Fruits of All Developing and Acquired Skills Available to the Black Community.

Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions.

Pledge Allegiance to All Black Leadership Who Espouse and Embrace the Black Value System.

Personal Commitment to Embracement of the Black Value System. To measure the worth and validity of all activity in terms of positive contributions to the general welfare of the Black Community and the Advancement of Black People towards freedom.

Barak Obama-from Chicago
Michelle Obama-from Chicago
Oprah-from Chicago
Wright-from Chicago
Moss-from Chicago
Farrakahn-from Chicago
Obama has taken $405,747 from the Pharmaceutical industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received $1,185,937 from the Commercial Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received over six million dollars from the Securities & Investment industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $608,822 from the Insurance industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $168,584 from the Mortgage Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
I found this posted elsewhere. It gives me great concern. I wish the media would investigate this and let the public know what is happening.
THE “BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY” OF REV. WRIGHT AND THE TRINITY UCC IS THE THEOLOGY EMBRACED BY BARACK OBAMA, WHO HAS REFUSED TO REPUDIATE WRIGHT OR THE THEOLOGY OF WRIGHT. WRIGHT OPENLY PROCLAIMED THE THEOLOGY AND IDEOLOGY OF JAMES CONE IS THE THEOLOGY OF TRINITY UCC AT LEAST SIX TIMES WHEN SPEAKING TO SEAN HANNITY IN THE OFTEN REPLAYED CABLE INTERVIEW WITH WRIGHT. THAT THEOLOGY IS AN AFRO-CENTRIC THEOLOGY. HERE IS SOME OF JAMES CONE’S TEACHINGS:”If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” (James Cone, quoted in William R Jones, ‘Divine Racism,” in African-American Religious Thought: An Anthology, ed. Cornel West, Eddie Glaube, 2003) James Cone, whom Rev Wright highly admires, goes on further: “Whiteness, as revealed in the history of America, is the expression of what is wrong with man. It is a symbol of man’s depravity. God cannot be white even though white churches have portrayed him as white . . . When we can see a people who are controlled by an ideology of whiteness, then we know what reconciliation must mean. The coming of Christ means a denial of what we thought we were. It means destroying the white devil in us. Reconciliation to God means that white people are prepared to deny themselves (whiteness), take up the cross (blackness) and follow Christ (black ghetto).” (James Cone: Black Theology and Black Power, 1997). IT IS APPARENT THAT THE PRESS HAS NOT DONE ITS JOB IN EXPLORING BARACK OBAMA’S PROFESSED “BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY” AND HIS POLITICS. WHY? OBAMA HAS REPEATEDLY STRESSED HIS “CHRISTIANITY” AND HIS SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH WRIGHT AND HIS CHURCH, BUT THE PRESS HAS NOT DELVED INTO THE “BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY” PRACTICED BY OBAMA AND HIS WIFE MICHELLE FOR ALMOST 20 YEARS. HOW DOES OBAMA RECONCILE THE RACIST AND DIVISIVE HATRED ESPOUSED BY JAMES CONE AND PRACTICED BY JEREMIAH WRIGHT WITH OBAMA’S PUBLICLY PROFESSED VISION OF UNITY. IF OBAMA TRULY BELIEVES IN UNITING AMERICA WHY HAS HE NOT LEFT THE TRINITY UCC FOR ANOTHER CHRISTIAN CHURCH THAT PROMOTES UNITY. IS IT BECAUSE “OBAMA’S CHRISTIANITY ” DOES NOT ACCEPT MORE INCLUSIVE CHRISTIAN SECTS THAT PROMOTE NON-AFRO-CENTRIC THEOLOGY. THE PRESS SHOULD PEPPER OBAMA WITH QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW ON WHY OBAMA ONLY “FOUND” CHRISTIANITY IN THE DIVISIVE THEOLOGY OF TRINITY UCC, PARTICULARLY SINCE OBAMA WAS EXPOSED TO OTHER CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIES IN SCHOOLS HE ATTENDED. ABSENT ADEQUATE EXPLANATION THE BODY POLITIC MUST CONCLUDE THAT BARACK OBAMA IS AN IMPOSTOR. SIMPLY PUT, IS OBAMA THE CONTENDER OR A PRETENDER?OBAMA CLEVERLY TURNED AN ISSUE ABOUT HIS RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS AND THEOLOGY INTO A DEBATE ON RACE. MOREOVER, THE PRESS WAS APPARENTLY SO BEGUILED BY OBAMA’S MARCH 18 SPEECH THAT NO MEMBER OF THE PRESS WOULD DELVE INTO THE INCONSISTENCIES PRESENTED BY OBAMA THE UNITY CANDIDATE AND OBAMA THE CONGREGANT OF AN AFRO-CENTRIC CHURCH. THAT THEOLOGICALLY IS UNDENIABLY DIVISIVE AND RACIST. WHY WOULD A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE EMBRACE SUCH A PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY? HOW CAN A PROFESSED “CHRISTIAN” WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT ON A PROMISE OF UNITY PROCLAIMING, “THERE ARE NO RED STATES OR BLUE STATES, THERE IS ONLY THE UNITED STATES” BE ANYTHING BUT A SLICK IMPOSTOR IF HE HAS EMBRACED THE IDEOLOGY AND THEOLOGY OF JAMES CONE FOR ALMOST 20 YEARS? ACCORDING TO JAMES CONE AND REV. WRIGHT, “Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” (James Cone, quoted in William R Jones, ‘Divine Racism,” in African-American Religious Thought: An Anthology, ed. Cornel West, Eddie Glaube, 2003).
Posted by:
TruthfulLiberal 6:28 PM

I promise not to post a dissertation. Senator Obama’s rhetoric is disingenuous, divisive, and polarizing towards Senator Clinton. Hillary’s ability to remain standing and resilience in the face of adversity suggest she is ready from day one to be our Commander-In-Chief!!!

Hey there,

Right on aout how long we have waited for a station like Fox, for men Like O’Reilly, Rush and others.

Now that the shoe is on the other foot, you know the LIBS cant stand it. They were so used to the libs point of view ON ALL MAJOR NETWORKS that they are shocked to actually hear some of Cons. point of view, I am so happy about that. FINALLY

Go McCain

Small town, gald to be an adult for first time, Rev. Wright, Ayers, the puzzle is coming together and he had the arrogance to try and pull it off…what a joke, Obama needs to learn a little humility and learn how to apologize, he acts as he doesn’t owe anybody an apology for anything……I’m from a small town and proud of it, regardless of my situation and faith. Go back to Calfornia and talk that stuff to the “Elitist” in private and then think no one will find out then don’t apologize and think it’s okay IT’s A BITTER PILL TO SWALLOW - TIME TO GO HOME OBAMA..

Barak Obama-from Chicago
Michelle Obama-from Chicago
Oprah-from Chicago
Wright-from Chicago
Moss-from Chicago
Farrakahn-from Chicago
Obama has taken $405,747 from the Pharmaceutical industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received $1,185,937 from the Commercial Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has received over six million dollars from the Securities & Investment industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $608,822 from the Insurance industry. [opensecrets.org]
Obama has taken $168,584 from the Mortgage Banking industry. [opensecrets.org]
I found this posted elsewhere. It gives me great concern. I wish the media would investigate this and let the public know what is happening.
THE “BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY” OF REV. WRIGHT AND THE TRINITY UCC IS THE THEOLOGY EMBRACED BY BARACK OBAMA, WHO HAS REFUSED TO REPUDIATE WRIGHT OR THE THEOLOGY OF WRIGHT. WRIGHT OPENLY PROCLAIMED THE THEOLOGY AND IDEOLOGY OF JAMES CONE IS THE THEOLOGY OF TRINITY UCC AT LEAST SIX TIMES WHEN SPEAKING TO SEAN HANNITY IN THE OFTEN REPLAYED CABLE INTERVIEW WITH WRIGHT. THAT THEOLOGY IS AN AFRO-CENTRIC THEOLOGY. HERE IS SOME OF JAMES CONE’S TEACHINGS:”If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods who do not belong to the black community … Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” (James Cone, quoted in William R Jones, ‘Divine Racism,” in African-American Religious Thought: An Anthology, ed. Cornel West, Eddie Glaube, 2003) James Cone, whom Rev Wright highly admires, goes on further: “Whiteness, as revealed in the history of America, is the expression of what is wrong with man. It is a symbol of man’s depravity. God cannot be white even though white churches have portrayed him as white . . . When we can see a people who are controlled by an ideology of whiteness, then we know what reconciliation must mean. The coming of Christ means a denial of what we thought we were. It means destroying the white devil in us. Reconciliation to God means that white people are prepared to deny themselves (whiteness), take up the cross (blackness) and follow Christ (black ghetto).” (James Cone: Black Theology and Black Power, 1997). IT IS APPARENT THAT THE PRESS HAS NOT DONE ITS JOB IN EXPLORING BARACK OBAMA’S PROFESSED “BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY” AND HIS POLITICS. WHY? OBAMA HAS REPEATEDLY STRESSED HIS “CHRISTIANITY” AND HIS SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH WRIGHT AND HIS CHURCH, BUT THE PRESS HAS NOT DELVED INTO THE “BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY” PRACTICED BY OBAMA AND HIS WIFE MICHELLE FOR ALMOST 20 YEARS. HOW DOES OBAMA RECONCILE THE RACIST AND DIVISIVE HATRED ESPOUSED BY JAMES CONE AND PRACTICED BY JEREMIAH WRIGHT WITH OBAMA’S PUBLICLY PROFESSED VISION OF UNITY. IF OBAMA TRULY BELIEVES IN UNITING AMERICA WHY HAS HE NOT LEFT THE TRINITY UCC FOR ANOTHER CHRISTIAN CHURCH THAT PROMOTES UNITY. IS IT BECAUSE “OBAMA’S CHRISTIANITY ” DOES NOT ACCEPT MORE INCLUSIVE CHRISTIAN SECTS THAT PROMOTE NON-AFRO-CENTRIC THEOLOGY. THE PRESS SHOULD PEPPER OBAMA WITH QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW ON WHY OBAMA ONLY “FOUND” CHRISTIANITY IN THE DIVISIVE THEOLOGY OF TRINITY UCC, PARTICULARLY SINCE OBAMA WAS EXPOSED TO OTHER CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIES IN SCHOOLS HE ATTENDED. ABSENT ADEQUATE EXPLANATION THE BODY POLITIC MUST CONCLUDE THAT BARACK OBAMA IS AN IMPOSTOR. SIMPLY PUT, IS OBAMA THE CONTENDER OR A PRETENDER?OBAMA CLEVERLY TURNED AN ISSUE ABOUT HIS RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS AND THEOLOGY INTO A DEBATE ON RACE. MOREOVER, THE PRESS WAS APPARENTLY SO BEGUILED BY OBAMA’S MARCH 18 SPEECH THAT NO MEMBER OF THE PRESS WOULD DELVE INTO THE INCONSISTENCIES PRESENTED BY OBAMA THE UNITY CANDIDATE AND OBAMA THE CONGREGANT OF AN AFRO-CENTRIC CHURCH. THAT THEOLOGICALLY IS UNDENIABLY DIVISIVE AND RACIST. WHY WOULD A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE EMBRACE SUCH A PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY? HOW CAN A PROFESSED “CHRISTIAN” WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT ON A PROMISE OF UNITY PROCLAIMING, “THERE ARE NO RED STATES OR BLUE STATES, THERE IS ONLY THE UNITED STATES” BE ANYTHING BUT A SLICK IMPOSTOR IF HE HAS EMBRACED THE IDEOLOGY AND THEOLOGY OF JAMES CONE FOR ALMOST 20 YEARS? ACCORDING TO JAMES CONE AND REV. WRIGHT, “Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.” (James Cone, quoted in William R Jones, ‘Divine Racism,” in African-American Religious Thought: An Anthology, ed. Cornel West, Eddie Glaube, 2003).
Posted by:
TruthfulLiberal 6:28 PM

Comment by McKeebop
April 14th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Don’t know how many Fox viewers are like me, but I watch because I am mesmerised by their sheer gall. I loathe the mothers and would be nearly as aghast if they were pushing from the other side of the political divide.

Everything down to the most minute detail is framed to accentuate the positive about Republicans and the negative about Democrats, and it is all done with a straight face.

Look at the cynical way they choose
_____________________________

McKeebop

You might be surprized but I agree with you here…Cnn does it and so does the other one but I thought FOX was above that. A lot of people are being hypocrits.

Pamela what are you smoking….

Bitter…..you want bitter,lets talk about His wife,his Pastor…..then maybe we’ll get around to him
Seems like His Pastor,now needs a funeral as his setting to show his bitterness to Fox news and White people…..Lets talk about bitterness Obama.His wife finally feels good about her country….just another Ivy league bred brat,with the same Marxist attitude,that is taught in those type of schools
My prayer is that the rest of the people,in the country,realize that there are small towns in their States as well,and that the only difference between them and we Pennsylvanians,is the name of the State,as far as I can see…..This guy is an elitist that thinks he can talk down to anybody.
Its my belief that the very thing he is most noted for is the thing that has put Him in the position he’s in now….That being, his reputation as an orator……Between his Big mouth and the one His Pastor has I’m believing that it will be their downfall….at least in Pa…..By the way,I won’t vote for Hillary either

Montana Super delegate gives Hillary her vote in breaking news. Small towns won’t buy this crap Obama. Sorry you can live with the “Elitist”

Reading these posts, I detect no anger or bitterness…. just optimism and resilience and the rosy-cheeked faith of decent hard-working Americans.

Dick Morris lives up to his name. I can’t stand him for some reason……..

Comment by Obamalies
April 14th, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Pamela what are you smoking….
_________________

hey I am still for McCain..I just see the hypocrisy with all the people trashing Obama when in all reality Hillary is not any different or worse..she is dangerous… media just chooses to ignore that..oh well I am used to it. If you stand for the truth it doesn’t seem right to ignore it when it faces you daily:)

I guess poor small town Americans are waiting with braided breath for Obama to come out and describe their lives for them– after all….

He first told them that they are typical white Americans

Then they learned that their church leaders sometimes say things that are very controversial and sometimes need to be ignored.

Then he informs them that they cling to their traditions when they are bitter

Then he tells them that they are bigots when they don’t agree with people whose lives are not like theirs

Then he informs them that they lost their jobs because of free trade and as a result they now support it? Not sure about that one

Anyway, you get the point– we can’t wait for Obama to define our lives further by next week– since the primary is just over a week away– there is a lot to look forward to…

TALK ABOUT SOMEONE WHO IS AN ELITIST–this guy takes the cake

LOL

One question to Obama– if this truly describes one segment of the voting population–ARE YOU REALLY SURE YOU WANNA GO AFTER IT and try to make inroads on it?

LOL–how bizarre

The main point is people do not go to church because they are bitter or because of Washington.

We go to church for salvation, for our eternal life. OBAMA called himself a Christian! A phony who let his greed OVER his belief. God is not black. That is blasphemy.

Pennsylvanians got to be angry. The world won’t forgive you if you vote for OBAMA.

People are bitter everywhere but they don’t go to church to show their bitterness unless you go to Rev. Wrights cult church. We go to church to worship our Lord. There are people in OBAMA’s home base, Illinois who are bitter. Should we hold OBAMA responsible or Washington responsible! OBAMA, of course. CNN’s reporter is trying to help OBAMA SIDESTEPPING his hypocrisy to tell us there are indeed bitterness in Pennsylvania . Shame on CNN!

Going to San Francisco and giving statements to raise fund at the cost of the pride of Pennsylvanian, OBAMA wants to impress the billionaires, MAN!

It is disgusting to hear OBAMA’s condescending tone of small town.

Look, this is a man who makes claim to change Washington. He can’t change Chicago. He can’t change REZKO. He is very much a part of them. Let the Chicago chicken goes home to roost.

OBAMA adopts a view that he is not responsible for ‘the bitterness’ of people. HOW Wrong! He has 20 years of experience of public service, he told us. It is politicians like him who makes his fortune in this country and who have been ignoring the bitterness until election time, that should be responsible. He is very much a part of the ELITE group causing bitterness.

OBAMA is really out of touch with SMALL TOWN PEOPLE. No matter how hard he tries to take off his jacket to make a mockery of of a working class imitation. He is still an ELITIST in his views of people, in his talking and in his acting.

GRIEF! His deplorable judgement.

Wake up America!! Before it is too late. Stop this WOLF in sheep skin. Their hate mails ain’t scare nobody.

Hillary or McCain; never OBAMA

my dog is havin puppies,, be back later

3/27/2008
The Obama Record: Just Words
To: Interested Parties
From: The Clinton Campaign
Date: March 26, 2008
RE: The Obama Record: Just Words
Yesterday, a Pennsylvania editorial board asked Sen. Clinton how she would have “responded if [her] pastor had said some of the things that Rev. Wright said?” In response, she said Rev. Wright would not have been her pastor, an honest view shared by many Americans.
The Obama campaign’s response? Attack Sen. Clinton and accuse her of trying to divert attention from the Bosnia trip story and her record of foreign policy experience.
Sen. Clinton’s response was sincere. The Obama attack was disingenuous.
We are happy to discuss Sen. Clinton’s foreign policy experience and her record overall. Unfortunately, the Obama campaign doesn’t want to discuss its candidate’s record and prefers personal attacks instead.
Sen. Obama knows that if he focused on his experience, he’d get questions about the shortcomings in his record and the efforts he has made to embellish it.
He’d have to deal with the fallout from this week’s Washington Post report on his gross exaggeration of his role on immigration reform and housing policy.
Sen. Obama would have to explain why the New York Times reported that he claims credit for passing nuclear leak legislation that never got out of committee.
He’d have to confront reports from FactCheck.org and other independent organizations that say his claims of providing a universal health care plan are based on selective, embellished and out-of-context quotes from newspapers.
He’d have to discuss the LA Times story that reported on how his fellow organizers say he took too much credit for his community organizing efforts.
He’d have to explain why he regularly claims he was a law professor when in fact he held no such title.
Sen. Obama seems to think disingenuous attacks