FOX Embeds

Taking It Back: Hillary Withdraws Denial of Obama Comment

An hour after Senator Clinton seemed to deny telling NM Gov Bill Richardson that Barack Obama couldn’t win the general election in November, a spokesman backtracked — telling reporters who’d been at the press conference that she misheard the question.

Asked at her media availability today whether or not she told Governor Bill Richardson that Obama can’t win in November — as reported by ABC News — Clinton said she wouldn’t talk about private conversations, then launched into an answer on why she feels she can win.

When the reporter followed up by asking “so that’s a no?” Clinton said “That’s a no.”

While reporters interpreted that response as an answer to the original, direct question on her alleged comments, her campaign now says she thought she’d been asked whether she would give an answer or not. Spokesman Mo Elleithee says Clinton told him that her “no” meant she was continuing to refuse comment on that private conversation with Richardson.

Watch the video here and decide for yourself what she meant.

Tags: , ,

Share

388 Responses to “Taking It Back: Hillary Withdraws Denial of Obama Comment”

Comment by vince

Can you say Flip - Flop??????????

 
Comment by Alice

Leave her alone. Get a life.
Go Hoodwink with Obama!!

 
Comment by Andylit

I don’t understand why anyone is bothered when she tells a truth instead of a lie.

 
Comment by Kelly

People in the state of Pennsylvania and other states should not vote for Hillary Clinton because after telling a lie about sniper fire in Bosnia and smiling about it when she told the story is scary. A person that lies about being shot at and almost losing there life is scary, and to smile about it, a person must have some real issues and no heart. There are troops actually getting shot at and dying for real, and she is smiling while telling her story about the Bosnia trip to the people, shows signs of being a liar and evil. There are families who troops have died in actual sniper fire, and she just lies and smiles about it like it is nothing, that scary. People on the streets of the USA who have been shot and killed, families loved one’s have been murdered, and for her to laugh and smile about getting shot at and almost dying is horrible thing for any human to do. I know troops who were offended by the sniper comment in Bosnia. When Hillary lied about that she let the american people know she does not care about lying or the troops fight for us. Nobody should want a president who lies about being shot at, then smile about it. If she lies about death, she would lie about anything.

 
Comment by Bella in Florida

The media has been biased against Hillary since the beginning of this campaign. They have been in love with Obama.Hillary is the most qualified person running for office.
Some of you are going to be really sorry that you voted for him because the man has no experience.

 
Comment by Danielle

Clinton Talks - Obama Balks
http://www.epgn.com/

 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

Do the numbers
Do the numbers

Thats all I here from you kool aid drinkers, so try this. Give me an honest path of how Obama can get the required 270 electoral college votes he needs to win the election. Heres Hillarys

CA OR WA AR TN FL MN WI MI OH PA DE NJ NY CT MA NH ME VT RI MA….278 and a win

I have even taken out Illinois cause Im sure if she gets the nomination the Obamabots there will go for McCain. Try for Obama.

 
Comment by Reagan Democrat

Obama will never win a general election. He is anti-American. No flag pin. Attends/tithes to anti-American church, Wife not proud of America, ties to Ayers.

I am an American first and a Democratic second. If Obama is the nominee I WANT John McCain to win.

How can you win a general election when half of your own party won’t even vote for you????

 
Comment by Kathmandu

Bella,

None of them have any experience as President.

 
Comment by Kathmandu

Reagon,

you are so hung up on the flag pin and the only one who wears it is Lou Dobbs. Give me a break!

 
Comment by Rj

WOW THIS IS A VERY BIG DEAL?????

THIS IS HOW MEDIA NOWADAYS ARE BETRAYING PUBLIC TRUST!!!

 
Comment by Rj

BASE ON THE INSIDER AMONGST THE GOP PEOPLE…

- SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON IS THE CANDIDATE THAT THEY WISHED NOT TO BE THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE IN THIS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION???

- RUSH LIMBAUGH AND OTHER TALK RADIO HOST AND GOP COMMENTATORS ADMITTTED THIS…

- THE OPERATION CHAOS IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO DESTROY CLINTON AND IT’S ALLIES… TO FAVOR OBAMA???

- RUSH LIMBAUGH IS LAUGHING OUT LOUD AT DEMOCRATIC SUPPORTERS BECAUSE OPERATION CHAOS IS REALLY WORKING IN FAVOR OF OBAMA WHOM THEY THINK IS BEATABLE THAN THE CLINTONS…

- RUSH SAID - WE’RE FOOLING THEM??? HA HA HA…

- DEMOCRATS WAKE UP!!!

 
Comment by Reagan Democrat

Kelly, Kelly, Kelly,

Obama lies about how his parents met in Selma, quitting smoking, and that he didn’t know his church was controversial.

Hillary embelished a story. There was in fact sniper fire in the hills. At least she made the trip which a lot of first ladies wouldn’t do. She looks so beautiful in that tape, talking to the Bosnia girl-visiting with soldiers. She is a true American ambassador.

Obama is as sleezy as his pals - Rezko, Wright and Ayers. I wonder if he ever did cocaine in that Purple Hotel they talk about in Rezkorama.com

 
Comment by Lou Dobbs

Please don’t Obamicate America. America has fought many wars and lost many lives for its freedom. Please don’t disgrace Americas great legacy of bravery and fortitude and forthrightness by supporting the disgusting moral bankruptcy of the Obama campaign.

 
Comment by An American in Canada

O.K. FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND A STATEMENTS HERE GOES,

IF HILLARY R. CLINTON SAYS THAT SHE WILL WIN THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION AND THE

ELECITON IN NOVEMBER

DOES IT NOT STAND TO REASON THAT WITHIN THAT STATEMENT IS

THE FACT THE BARACK H. OBAMA WILL NOT AND CAN NOT WIN THE ELECTION.

CASE CLOSED.

HILLARY R. CLINTON PRESIDENT OF AMERICA 2009-2012

YES OBAMA COULD NOT WIN THE ELECTION IN NOVEMBER, AND YOU CAN QUOTE HILLARY R CLINTON’S BLOGGERS AND REAL SUPPORTERS.

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by Bella in Florida
April 3rd, 2008 at 8:19 pm

The media has been biased against Hillary since the beginning of this campaign. They have been in love with Obama.Hillary is the most qualified person running for office.
Some of you are going to be really sorry that you voted for him because the man has no experience.
————————————

In overall experience, I can’t help but wonder why people even talk about BO or the Banshee.

None of the candidates has been President. That seems to be a problem all first term Presidents bring with them

So,you have the Banshee.

7 years in office as a US Senator. Prior to that, lots of experience hosting tea parties for the spouses of heads of state. One absolute disaster as the leader of the ClintonCare debacle. She really showed us her chops with that one. On the plus side, she has lots of experience at criisi management. After handling…how many…bimbo eruptions and keeping Slick in office in spite of himself. Wow. Prior experience as a reptile…sorry…lawyer.

And BO.

3 years as a US Senator. 7 Years State Senator. Previously a “community organizer” and reptile…oops…lawyer. huzzah.

McCain

23 years as a Naval officer, decorated, POW, 3 years Admin experience as CO in Pensacola. 4 years US Congressman. 20 years US Senator. Not a reptile.

 
Comment by An American in Canada

WHO LISTENS TO THE GOP AND THEIR RHETHORIC THAT THEY WISH TO RUN AGAINST HILLARY R. CLINTON.. YEA RIGHT AND WE BELIEVE YOU!

THE GOP DO NOT EVEN WANT JOHN MCCAIN AS THEIR NOMINEE THEY WILL SUPPORT HILLARY R. CLINTON BECAUSE SHE IS THE BEST PERSON FOR THE JOB.

YOU NEED GOOD CREDENTIALS FOR THE BEST JOB IN AMERICA
IT IS A JOB THAT CAN NOT BE PURCHASED
IT IS A JOB THAT AMERICAN VOTE AND EXPECT TO HAVE THEIR VOTES COUNTED…

DNC WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN WE WILL NOT PERMIT YOU TO DISENFRANCHISE OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN THESE TWO GREAT STATES….

DO YOU DUTY AND GET THESE CITIZENS ON BOARD AND MAKE SURE THEY VOTES ARE COUNTED, THAT IS ALL YOU HAVE TO CONCERN YOURSELVES WITH .

 
Comment by Pamela

Read this interview with a young muslim around 16-years old …Both Democrats deny his story is a problem.

Muslims Against Sharia
By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Khalim Massoud, the president of Muslims Against Sharia, an Islamic reform movement.

FP: Khalim Massoud, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Massoud: Thank you.

FP: Tell us why it is necessary for you to wear sunglasses in the picture you gave us to use of you.

Massoud: As you might imagine, Islamists are not particularly happy with our group. According to our poll, over 20% of Muslims want us beheaded. I am perfectly content with my head not being separated from my body and I’d like to keep it that way for as long as I can.

FP: Sounds like a good idea.

Tell us what Muslims Against Sharia is about.

Massoud: Our organization is created to give voice to moderate Muslims who are virtually ignored by governments and media and to expose the radicals masquerading as moderates. Our goals are

* to educate Muslims about dangers presented by Islamic religious texts and why Islam must be reformed.

* to educate non-Muslims about the differences between moderate Muslims and Islamists (a.k.a. Islamic Religious Fanatics, Radical Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Islamic Extremists or Islamofascists).

* to educate both Muslims and non-Muslims alike that Moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic Terror.

FP: Why do you think moderate Muslims are virtually ignored by governments and the media?

Massoud: Most of American mosques are financed and run by Wahhabis. Wahhabi imams are anything but moderate, hence most of religious leaders are radicals. So-called “civil rights” groups, i.e., CAIR, MPAC, ICNA, MAS, etc. that comprise Muslim establishment are nothing more than offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood and fronts for Hamas and al-Qaeda. They are very well financed and are extremely skilful manipulators of the media. And most of the people in government and media truly believe that those groups are moderate, because they are either too lazy to do research or they choose to ignore terrorist ties.

As a result, when either the government or the media needs an Islamic point of view, Muslim establishment groups are go-to “experts” by default. With the “expert” seat being filled, moderate Muslims are left out.

Another problem with moderate Muslims is they are scared and not organized. They are scared because they cannot speak up in mosques for fear of being kicked out and there are virtually no organizations that represent their views. They are not organized, because, unlike the radical, they do not receive tens of millions of dollars in financial support, therefore they have to work for a living.

FP: Why do radical Muslims masquerade as moderates? What are their strategies in doing this? Are they effective in doing so? Who have been some of the radicals that have been exposed?

Massoud: Radical Muslims are masquerading as moderates because they have no control over the military and police. Yet.

They cannot openly proclaim their agenda of Islamic domination in front of Western audiences. They are gradually taking over the West. Some countries in Europe (France, Britain, Germany, etc.) are partially ruled by Sharia law, and even up in Canada, there is talk about Sharia courts for Muslim communities.

Their strategy is very simple. They constantly claim that they are peaceful and moderate, and Western media is more than happy to repeat that nonsense. They do not praise terrorism in public, but they justify it by playing the Muslim victimhood card. And they are very effective at it.

Many radical organizations have already been exposed by counter-terrorism researchers like Steven Emerson, John Loftus, Rachel Ehrenfeld, Joe Kaufman, Paul Sperry, Zeyno Baran, and many others. The proof that the Muslim establishment is anything but moderate is widely available. However, the government and the media either for political reasons or out of sheer stupidity completely ignore it.

FP: Is it possible to give a simple answer to this question: what exactly is the difference between a moderate Muslim and a radical Muslim? Where is the fine line that separates them?

Massoud: Absolutely. The determining criteria is the belief in Islamic supremacy. Radical Muslims believe in Islamic supremacy, which makes them religiously obligated to wage Jihad for world domination, using both terrorism and gradual subversion of host societies. Moderate Muslims consider their religion a private matter and believe in religious equality.

FP: What are some of the dangers presented by Islamic religious texts? If you are a Muslim, then how can you reject these texts and remain a faithful Musilm?

Massoud: Most of the dangers are presented by passages based on the Islamic supremacy doctrine. The Koran contains verses that command us to subjugate or murder non-Muslims in order to create Islamic rule. On the other hand, the Koran teaches preciousness of human life. How can a logical person believe that those diametrically opposed concepts came from the same source? How could Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate be the source of “kill [infidels] them wherever you find them”? The only logical explanation is that the Koran has been corrupted over the centuries, and all we want to do is to revert it as close as possible to the original.

FP: I would like to touch on your intriguing point that “the Koran has been corrupted over the centuries, and all we want to do is to revert it as close as possible to the original.” Is there any textual support for such a notion? And doesn’t this notion run counter to the Islamic doctrine of the perfection of the Qur’an, which insists that the Qur’anic text is the same as it was in the time of Uthman? In light of these considerations, do you think you will gain much support in the Islamic world?

Massoud: We do not have any direct evidence that the Koran has been corrupted over the centuries. However, there is some circumstantial evidence supporting our point. First, if you take two English Korans translated by two different people, the difference could be very substantial. Substantial to the point that the same verses could have completely different meaning. Case in point: a recent arrest of Ghows Zalmay, who, according to the fundamentalists, misinterpreted some verses in the Koran.

Based on these facts, it is reasonable to conclude that when the Koran was copied many times over, the mere mortals who did the copying might have “adjusted” the texts to reflect their personal views, or the views of their superiors.

Second is deductive reasoning. The Koran contains verses that represent mutually exclusive concepts, i.e., human ‘life is precious’ vs. ‘kill the infidels wherever you find them’ or ‘respect the People of the Book’ vs. ‘do not take Jews and Christians for friends’.

Allah is infallible and cannot contradict himself, which means that some of those verses are not the literal word of Allah. Also, how can Allah, who is the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate be a source of “kill them [infidels] wherever you find them”?

The only logical explanation is that the Koran we have today was significantly altered.

As for gaining much support in Islamic world, we believe that education is the key. Our experience shows that if we present our view to an open-minded skeptic, chances are we’ll gain a supporter.

FP: How and why must Islam be reformed? Is this really possible? Some would argue that if you take the Islam out of Islam, it will no longer be an Islam. What would you say to that?

Massoud: Islam in its present form is incompatible with modern society, that’s why it needs to be reformed. The first step is to abandon the doctrine of Islamic supremacy and remove passages from religious texts that could be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as calls to violence. We believe it is possible. Muslims, just as all other people, are human beings. If Christians could abandon the Inquisition, Muslims can abandon Jihad. Taking violence out of Islam is not the same as taking Islam out of Islam. It is a historical fact that major religions like Christianity and Judaism have undergone reformations on more than one occasion. Islamic reformation is no different.

FP: I very much appreciate your position and your goals are truly admirable. I would just like to say that the Christian reformation and the potential Islamic reformation are different. Christians easily abandoned the Inquisition because the Inquisition was un-Christian and had no foundation in Christian texts. The key is that when Christians have behaved in aggressive or intolerant ways, their acts were not based on Christian teachings; their acts were un-Christian. But the same cannot be said for Muslims when they engage in aggression and intolerance, since such behavior is a fulfillment of their theological mandates. All the schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach that it is part of the responsibility of the umma to subjugate the non-Muslim world through jihad.

But in any case, it is all of our great hope that Muslims such as yourself can succeed in the reformation you wish to engender in Islam. The key though: isn’t there a belief among Muslims that the Koran is the literal word of Allah and that it cannot be tampered with?

Massoud: The original Koran is the literal world of Allah and should not have been tampered with. The Almighty God, whether you call him Yahweh or Allah, is infallible. Since modern versions of the Koran contain contradictions, they cannot possibly be the literate word of God. Therefore, the belief that the modern Koran is untouchable is based on ignorance. God gave people free will, and unscrupulous people who were supposed to safeguard the Koran corrupted it instead. Now, we must change it back.

I also do not believe that all the schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach that it is part of the responsibility of the Ummah to subjugate the non-Muslim world through Jihad, i.e., Sufism.

FP: I am a bit confused as to who can arrogate to themselves the authority to be the arbiter of what the “original” Koran actually said. What if some Muslims argued that they need to “change it back” to get rid of all the peaceful messages that the Koran has in it, on the premise that the violent passages represent the real Koran? Wouldn’t this make more sense since the historical Mohammed was himself a military man who waged war, captured slaves, preached war against unbelievers, etc.? He led by example did he not? If this is not true, then how exactly do you argue that Islam is meant to be peaceful if Mohammed was himself a man of war?

It also appears from your words that you reject the idea of abrogation, as delineated by Qur’an 2:106. If so, how do you propose to distinguish between the original Qur’an you are saying existed and the interpolated passages, since there is no textual evidence for such an original Qur’an?

Also, what do you make of the fact that the Qadari movement, which upheld free will, was declared heretical by numerous Islamic authorities and eventually wiped out?

I would also like to touch on the point of the schools of Islamic jurisprudence. In terms of Sufism, for example, it remains a bit of mystery why this sect of Islam is constantly portrayed as being non-violent and tolerant when the history of the Sufis is actually one of violent jihad. The jihad in Chechnya is a prime example.

Also, Sufism is an order, a way of mysticism, not a school of Islamic jurisprudence. Moreover, the pioneering Sufi, Al-Ghazali, was clear that his Sufism did not negate his support for Islamic supremacism. Andrew Bostom has published this quote from Al-Ghazali:

“[O]ne must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year…one may use a catapult against them [non-Muslims] when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire to them and/or drown them…If a person of the Ahl al-Kitab [People of The Book – primarily Jews and Christians] is enslaved, his marriage is [automatically] revoked…One may cut down their trees…One must destroy their useless books. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide…they may steal as much food as they need…[T]he dhimmi is obliged not to mention Allah or His Apostle…Jews, Christians, and Majians must pay the jizya [poll tax on non-Muslims]…on offering up the jizya, the dhimmi must hang his head while the official takes hold of his beard and hits [the dhimmi] on the protruberant bone beneath his ear [i.e., the mandible]… They are not permitted to ostentatiously display their wine or church bells…their houses may not be higher than the Muslim’s, no matter how low that is. The dhimmi may not ride an elegant horse or mule; he may ride a donkey only if the saddle[-work] is of wood. He may not walk on the good part of the road. They [the dhimmis] have to wear [an identifying] patch [on their clothing], even women, and even in the [public] baths…[dhimmis] must hold their tongue…. (From the Wagjiz, written in 1101 A.D.)”

What are your thoughts on these realities?

Mr. Massoud, please do not misunderstand by questions and arguments here. I am in full support of you and your organization and it is obviously the West’s and the world’s prayer that Muslims will follow people like you. I am only asking these questions to clarify matters and to crystallize if the possibility of an Islamic reformation is truly a genuine hope and can be based on strong and realistic foundations.

Massoud: We do not claim to have authority to be arbiters of what the original Koran said. What we do, is put forth our arguments why we believe that the modern Koran is not the same as the original. It is up to the Ummah to judge the validity of our arguments and whether accept or reject them.

The notion that violent passages represent the real Koran is contradictory to the notion that Allah is the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate, therefore, we believe it is incorrect. The issue of the Prophet Muhammad is very complicated. On the one hand, he was a human, and, therefore, imperfect. On the other hand, it is impossible to know how much of the historical accounts of that time are true and how much is fiction. If the Koran could have been changed over the centuries, so is the version of events surrounding Mohammad’s life.

The idea of abrogation would run contrary to the idea of Allah’s infallibility. We cannot with absolute certainty distinguish between the divine and ‘man-made’ verses. But we can do the best we can by using common sense. As for the Qadari movement (which I am not familiar with), not every reform movement achieves its goals, but that does not mean that we shouldn’t even try.

Sufism may have its dark aspects, but in today’s world it is as close to our idea of Islam as it gets. Sufi Islamic Supreme Council of America is the only real Islamic religious authority in the North America that does not advocate ideas of Islamic supremacy. Jihad in Chechnya is not indicative of Sufism. The remnants of Sufism that survived 70 years of Soviet rule are dominated by Wahhabism. Calling Chechen mujahideen Sufi is just as misleading as calling CAIR moderate.

Mr. Glazov, there is no reason to qualify your questions. They are legitimate attempts to get to the truth of the matter and nobody should be offended by honest and direct questions about ’sensitive’ subjects. Failing to ask those questions is what got us where we are today in the first place.

FP: Can you talk a bit about how moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic terror?

Massoud: Darfur. Hundreds of thousands of Black Muslims are murdered by the radicals. Algeria: more than a hundred thousands of Muslims are murdered by the radicals. Iraq: tens of thousands of Muslims are murdered by the radicals. Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza, West Bank, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Chechnya. Any place where there is conflict that involves Muslims, moderates are being murdered by radicals. Radical Muslims wage Jihad to kill infidels, and many of them consider moderate Muslims as infidels. This is a DHS-type threat level table that illustrates my point:

FP: Earlier you noted that a poll your group did revealed that roughly one-fifth of Muslims think that Muslims like you should be beheaded. What is your interpretation of this fact?

Massoud: Muslims like us present the biggest danger to the Islamists because we are destroying the myth of moral authority of the fundamentalism. When non-Muslims point out flaws in Islam, the radicals dismiss them as Islamophobes. When Muslims talk about problems with Islam, they are not as easy to dismiss. Moderate Muslims are the best antidote to Islamist venom and Western governments are being very unwise to choose radicals over moderates.

FP: So what is the most effective way we can help moderates and reformers such as yourselves?

Massoud: You, meaning non-Muslims, must stop living in your PC fantasy world, stop worrying about offending Muslims, and start calling things what they are. You must draw a clear distinction between Muslims and Islamofascists, between Islam and Islamism. Muslims will not be offended at the term “Islamofascism” as long as it is clear that the term applies to Islamists, not Muslims in general. You can no longer afford to pretend that there is no global war between Islamists and the rest of the world. You must pressure the government and the media to stop whitewashing (and cut all ties with) Islamists. Just because Islamists claim to be moderates, that doesn’t make it so.

You must stop financing radical Islamic regimes like Saudi Arabia and Iran by sending billions of Petro-Dollars to the Persian Gulf. You must provide political (and should provide financial) support for moderate Muslim groups, i.e., American Islamic Forum for Democracy. There are plenty of moderate Muslims who would join the fight against Islamism, given the chance. It must be made absolutely clear that terrorism is a military issue and terrorism cases, i.e., HLF or al-Arian, have no place in civilian courts. When Islamists praise bin Laden, march with “Hizballah is our Army” posters, or desecrate the American flag, you call it freedom of speech. But when a counter-terrorism researcher protests against events organized by Islamists, he is charged with harassment and gets a restraining order. And when another counter-terrorism researcher sheds light on Islamist-al Qaeda ties, she is sued for libel.

FP: Are you optimistic that non-Muslims and moderate Muslims that want to preserve Western civilization and liberty will be able to defeat the force of radical Islam?

Massoud: Yes, if the West wakes up before it’s too late. Unfortunately, at this time, the West seems to be more interested in Left vs. Right rather than Freedom vs. Slavery & Death.

FP: Khalim Massoud, thank you for joining us and thank you for your courage and for your noble fight to spawn an Islamic reformation.

Massoud: Jamie, thank you for having me and giving me a forum to present our views.

——————————————————————————–
Jamie Glazov is Frontpage Magazine’s managing editor. He holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He edited and wrote the introduction to David Horowitz’s Left Illusions. He is also the co-editor (with David Horowitz) of The Hate America Left and the author of Canadian Policy ….

 
Comment by Didn't I tell you??

On an earlier blog, I bet $25 that this would kill her if she denied this BECAUSE RICHARDSON PROBABLY TAPED THE CALL. He would give it to the media to destroy her. Good for her staff to clarify this before she dealt with major fallout.

This just proves how ruthless team Obama is. He is bowling and blowing sunshine up people’s
butts while his team is working over time to deal Clinton a dirty KO. This is the same staff who is buying dem superdelegates like the dick in Vt, hag Pelosi, Dumb Dean, Kerry, and Richardson, who are demanding an end to the campaign. Why is it that all of the loudest voices calling for Hillary to step aside are in the Obama Cult? And how come the press is afraid to inform of us this? Why does CNN and MSNBC present these frauds as disinterested voices concerned for the party??

A dirty politician from chicago has BOUGHT influential Dems and cable news stations to create a CLINTON IS DOOMED narrative — they have effectively hijacked this very close race — and we crown him with a HALO.

Poor Hillary. If only she had more money to act like Obama — to buy the press so they looked the other way or always presented her in a favorable light while she undermined the Dem process to win a cheap victory.

 
Comment by ari

Latest poll shows that Obama slight lead in Penn. state. Hillary can’t change this democratic process, and will go down and become part of the losers club.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pppmain.asp?@spdT=B6B42829136845A69B19

 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

Arkansas: McCain vs. Clinton UCA McCain 36, Clinton 51, Und 10 Clinton +15
Arkansas: McCain vs. Obama UCA McCain 43, Obama 27, Und 26 McCain +16

Arkansas: McCain vs. Obama SurveyUSA McCain 53, Obama 33, Und 14 McCain +20
Arkansas: McCain vs. Clinton SurveyUSA McCain 40, Clinton 51, Und 9 Clinton +11

Tennessee: McCain vs. Clinton SurveyUSA McCain 46, Clinton 46, Und 8 Tie
Tennessee: McCain vs. Obama SurveyUSA McCain 54, Obama 38, Und 8 McCain +16

Scott,
Just like Hillary I dont want to miss out any facts for you. And just like Obama you’ll probably say Im playing the race card by going against your golden child. Let me repeat it for you new democrats in the back.

OBAMA CONNOT WIN THE GENERAL ELECTION
Losing the white vote at a 35/65 clip makes it impossible, and you Obamapologists are ruining it for the real democrats. Leave our party.

 
Comment by OWO

Is that dude on MSNBC…..Chris Matthews a gay guy? After last nights interview with Obama I though the dude was about to kiss him or something. I was like, what’s up with that.

Not that I care……….but if the dude has a crush on Obama the public should know that’s the reason for all the good publicity he has been giving him.

 
Comment by HARLEY LOWRIDER IL.

ANDYLIT…How ya doin bud ?

 
Comment by Jim

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS ,

Quit whining and accept that fact that Hillary has lost. She ain’t gonna win!!

 
Comment by Richard McDonough

Hillary mis-speaks, mis-hears. What else does she mis-do? Give me a break.

The woman is either the biggest lier to run since Bill, (or Bush, who at least knew he was stupid, )or soft as an old shoe. Choose one of the above.

The only integrity in this race is from Illinois and is named Obama.

The Ancient Mariner wants war 24/7, unless he forgets, which he does often.

 
Comment by Rush Limbaugh

Vote Hillary for the Democratic Nominee!

She survived snipers in Bosnia, slept with the President, voted for war in Iraq, beat the great Rick Lazio, failed at socializing health care, helped James McDougal commit S&L fraud and bribed Webster Hubbell. Lots of experience!

 
 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

JIM = Obama

-Too lazy to do his own work
-Refuses to accept that a democratic process needs to happen to get elected
-Has no facts only rhetoric
-Is destroying the DNC
-Not smart enough to have an actual conversation….just says “do the math”

You are pathetic sir, and you and your anti-american candidate will get smoked in the general. thanks for coming though

Try again and answer the question….What is Obamas path to the WH

 
Comment by goatboy from africa

Hillbilly no have African cred street
They need advisor goatboy

 
Comment by Andylit

3-1/2 hour drive, empty house (except for the cat), thin crust garbage pizza (now deceased)

Could be better, could be worse.

 
Comment by Jim

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS,

You don’t know much about polling. That don’t mean anything. There has never been a poll taken in April that accurately reflected the results in November. So don’t waste your time trying to tell people that they matter.

All that matters is that Obama has the lead and he will win the nomination and then the presidency.

 
Comment by OWO

Richard:

I hate to tell you this, but after last nights interview with Chris’tina’ Matthews. I think that dude from Minnesota may have something.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY

Big ole gay……….big ole gay.

 
Comment by lionred

Democrats are starting behave like dummies!!! If Obama should win the democratic nomination, I and millions of other Hillary Clinton supporters will vote proudly for John McCain. Also if the votes of Michigan and Florida aren’t considered then Obama will be illegitimate nominee. Wake up democrats, before you shoot our party in the foot !

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by Rush Limbaugh
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:16 pm

Vote Hillary for the Democratic Nominee!

She survived snipers in Bosnia, slept with the President,
——————————–

He did NOT have sexual relations with that woman, and you can’t make him do it.

 
Comment by Jeff X

Hey Goatboys back

 
Comment by goatboy from africa

Goatboy want to introduce mathews to hung well zebra

 
Comment by ari

Pamela
Horowitz’s Center for the Study of Popular Culture is one of 17 “right-wing foundations and think tanks support[ing] efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable”. Its like a propaganda tool, and that Horowitz is a overly staunch supporter of Israel. A zionist wth some really weird ideas.

 
Comment by Lee Walther

First she has misspoken and now misheard …God forbid if she would be the President of this USA

 
Comment by Jeff X

Goatboy, Mathews should be wearing a dress.

 
Comment by David

Hillary: take two…..

Hillary: take three ….

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by ari
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:25 pm

Pamela
Horowitz’s Center for the Study of Popular Culture is one of 17 “right-wing foundations and think tanks support[ing] efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable”. Its like a propaganda tool, and that Horowitz is a overly staunch supporter of Israel. A zionist wth some really weird ideas.
——————-

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH ARI!?!?!

Where’s my semi-literate little buddy? What have you done, you fiend.

 
Comment by Cooper

Mishears…Mis-states. What if she mishears the 3:00 am call? “I misheard the word. I thought Chelsea was asking for the Secret Service agents to get her some nuggets when it was really the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs telling me that (name some country) was going nuclear and rockets were on the way. Anybody can make a mistake like that.”

She seems to have a consistent problem with hearing and understanding. Or, is that being willing to be accountable?

 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

Jim,

The fact that you answer my question with only rhetoric and not facts means one of the following

-You are in fact Barack Obama himself
-You are too uneducated to form a reasonable and logical answer
-You are too lazy too form a reasonable answer
_Too much Kool Aid…too few brain cells

-OR (and most likely)-

OBAMA CANNOT WIN A GENERAL ELECTION

If this is in fact the case please continue your mindless drivel and show us all that you have no business in voting in the first place.

 
Comment by Obamamania

Obama is our Savior. Barak and Reverend Wright are Right, God D*** america. Now is the time to rally around Barak and Michelle and make them proud! No more so called elections where typical white people vote! And news flash america, Barak is right, your typical white american is a racist! Obama will apologize to our Muslim brothers for arrogant american policies of hate and slavery. Only Obama can forgive an evil nation founded on slavery. REPARATIONS NOW!

 
Comment by goatboy from africa

mathews want obama python around his neck

 
Comment by pmoe

reply to Rush

Do you have any credible proof that Hillary sept with the President? That wouldnt benefit either one on politically and Bill was mighty busy with the others.

 
Comment by Pamela

Comment by ari
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Pamela
Horowitz’s Center for the Study of Popular Culture is one of 17 “right-wing foundations and think tanks support[ing] efforts to make bigoted and discredited ideas respectable”. Its like a propaganda tool, and that Horowitz is a overly staunch supporter of Israel. A zionist wth some really weird ideas.
_____________________________________________________________________

Hi ari-

Does anything you just wrote change the young man’s story?

 
Comment by Andylit

The Center for the Study of Popular Culture actually focuses on trying to reassert a conservative presence in the bastions of radical leftism.

They focus on Hollywood and Universities.

 
Comment by OWO

Goatboy:

Around his neck?????

 
Comment by goatboy from africa

sorry….obama centipede

 
Comment by Jim

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS,

“Mindless drivel”. Ha Ha. You’re the fool who is still trying to get Hillary the nomination. The worthless hag is finished and America will not have to suffer her.

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by pmoe
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:29 pm

reply to Rush

Do you have any credible proof that Hillary sept with the President? That wouldnt benefit either one on politically and Bill was mighty busy with the others.
————————

Jeez. Just look at the kid. What other proof do you need? Worst of both sides. Poor thing.

 
Comment by goatboy from africa

Chelsea look like sack full of wildabeast anus

 
Comment by Jeff X

REPARATION PLANNED PAYOUT

#1 40 oz. bottle of Colt 45 in a plain paper bag

#2 Rusty 1969 Cadilliac Coupe de Viille

#3 A carton of Kools

#4. A hair pick

#5 Costume jewelry “gold” chain

#6 Ugly floral couch with clear plastic cover

#7 Framed picture of a watercolor reprint of a Lion

#8 VCR tape of the “Flip Wilson Show”

Total price per recipient $297.58

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by goatboy from africa
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:35 pm

Chelsea look like sack full of wildabeast anus
———————-

I thought I already said that. The Banshee definitely slept with the President. Chelsea has Carter’s ears.

 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

Jim,

You obviously have no concern for America or the DNC. We (the real democratic party members) want a democrat (not a racist democrat) in the white house. All you want is Obama.

Hillary has a clear path to the White House and Obama does not. You are a lazy, uneducted burden on the tax payers, who wont even take 5 minutes to explain to all of us how exactly your candidate makes it in to the White House. You like Obama are running on pixie dust and rainbows and unfortunately McCain and the GOP are going to kick the living crap out of you in November.

Then you will blame Hillary. Its pathetic and people like you that the DNC does not need helping us. Go away or answer the question.

 
Comment by pmoe

reply to andy

that one time doesnt count, he wasnt the pres then

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by Jim
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:32 pm

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS,

“Mindless drivel”. Ha Ha. You’re the fool who is still trying to get Hillary the nomination. The worthless hag is finished and America will not have to suffer her.
———————————————–

It will certainly be interesting to watch. The real key is who can buy off enough SD’s.

No matter what happens, the Dems are going to have a really tough time in the general.

So much slime yet to uncover…and plenty of time to do it.

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by pmoe
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:38 pm

reply to andy

that one time doesnt count, he wasnt the pres then
——————–

Timing is everything. It was Carter, lutsing in more than his heart.

 
Comment by Jim

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS,

You don’t have a clue. All Obama has to do is win 270 presidential electors to win the presidency.

 
Comment by goatboy from africa

Jeff X payout sound like street easy to goatboy

 
Comment by Jolene

hillary is so cool and poised. i know she has been thru soooo much in her lifetime but i’m telling you. i’m telling you she has to be one of the most courageous people i know after seeing her walk with grace and confidence into the lion’s den of the state of the black union w/tavis smiley-not and his angry/ambivalent audience. she totally won me over that day and the deal was sealed. She should be our President. Obama would not come. He has never been there for us ( I am a black women). He lives in the white part of town and Rev. Wight’s home is being built in the up scale white part of the city. Hillary has done more for us then Obama ever has.

 
Comment by pmoe

Wow thats a 2 bagger.

 
Comment by ari

Pamela
Have my doubts about story and relevance. The intention is not to inform, but a leading conversation. That whole institute sees a conspiracy between jihad and left-wing at every corner and university. Islamphobic, rascist and a bigot, founder should be deported to Israel if he is so found of it.

 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

Yes Jim Im well aware of how the democratic process works. Congratulations on learning how to use Google. Here is how Hillary wins the General Election….

CA OR WA AR TN FL MN WI MI OH PA DE NJ NY CT MA NH ME VT RI MA….278 and a win

I have even taken out Illinois cause Im sure if she gets the nomination the Obamabots there will go for McCain. If I am going to be forced to have Obama as the candidate to represent my party, all I am asking is to tell me how he gets there.

Not a single one of you Obamapologists can give a straight answer. You have been listening to your pastor to much

 
Comment by molly

GO HILLARY !!!
OBama will not be elected - his judgment & background are just too questionable to be President of the United States.
Also - Count FL & MI - then Hillary will win the popular vote - watch her win big in the next 10 states - she will win!
Obama cannot block FL & MI - does he really want to risk loosing these huge states in the general election????

 
Comment by Ann Knapp

Never ending. Hillary made out to be the worst by the media! It goes on and on and on. I think of a Bible Study teacher who always said it was just as important to know what the Bible didn’t say as much as what it did say. Obama is the biggest liar when he first said he didn’t know his preacher made those comments. Now his pastor is being glorified by the black community like a hero for making those remarks where they honored him and gave him a standing ovation and the media doesn’t even mention it. Give me a break. We are right back to the shades of the last election when the conservative evangelicals voted Bush in. Only problem is we are now in such a mess as a result of it. Voting for Obama charisma and fast talking will be a disaster for the Democratic party. If he wins the primary, he will never win the general election. 4 more yrs. of the Republicans…………Grin and bare it! or should I say bear it?

 
Comment by pmoe

Reply to jolene

I would have to agree that she has endured a great deal and would make a much better president that Obama, but I dont believe that either one of them have the leadership skills or experience to lead the country.

 
Comment by Andylit

Comment by Jim
April 3rd, 2008 at 9:40 pm

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS,

You don’t have a clue. All Obama has to do is win 270 presidential electors to win the presidency.
———————

When’s the last time you looked at the remaining delegates and the probable vote splits in those states?

Like it or not, the Dems are looking at a stalemate unless one or the other bows out.

I see it this way. BO keeps his 100-150 delegate lead at the end. The Banshee is banking on more and more crap being dug up on BO. Her probable strategy is to keep reminding the SD’s that BO is getting more and more unacceptable to the main stream as each little tidbit comes out.

Further, she will argue that if he gets the nomination, the gloves will really come off in the general.

I suspect she may be correct. One can only wonder what juicy nuggets the GOP has waiting for use against BO in the general.

The Banshee is badly tainted, but that is all “old” news to the American public.

 
Comment by QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS

Heres your challenge Obamabots. Show me an honest way that Obama gets to 270 and I will vote for him over writing in for Hillary. I want a democrat too, but you are all foolish if you think he can beat the GOP.

 
Comment by HUMA hillarys top aide "pie"

The kitchen sink strategy hillary admits in debate “i will do everthing i can to win”
case closed she said it in a debate ..so then why is she up in arms when sombody said she is pimping out chelsa to the superdelegates. and demanded msnbc to fire david shuster. i thought it was funny and not as low as the judas comment by top hillary strategist carvelle

 
Comment by Jim

QUESTIONS FOR OBAMABOTS,

Polls in April do not mean anything. Go back and research the past elections and then please show me an accurate poll. If you can’t do that, then stop your yapping about polls.

I’ll explain further to you about polls. There have been polls this week that Have Obama up by 2 in PA, Hillary by 5 and Hillary by 10. An intelligent person would reach the conclusion that they are not reliable and would not base an argument on them.

 
Comment by Pamela

FP: Can you talk a bit about how moderate Muslims are also targets of Islamic terror?

Massoud: Darfur. Hundreds of thousands of Black Muslims are murdered by