<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain defends Hagee endorsement despite differences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hagee and McCain: A mutual breakup &#171; FOX Embeds &#171; FOXNews.com</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-159631</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagee and McCain: A mutual breakup &#171; FOX Embeds &#171; FOXNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-159631</guid>
		<description>[...] specific incendiary Hagee remarks during the last three months but defended his endorsement, often praising the pastor&#8217;s support for Israel, and consistently stated that accepting his endorsement did not mean he also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] specific incendiary Hagee remarks during the last three months but defended his endorsement, often praising the pastor&#8217;s support for Israel, and consistently stated that accepting his endorsement did not mean he also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdenied</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-127254</link>
		<dc:creator>jackdenied</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-127254</guid>
		<description>How does the most far-reaching amnesty plan teaming with a loser like Edward Kennedy qualify McCrap as conservative?

Flush the John-2008!!!
&lt;a href="http://sallesdepoker.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/types-de-tournois/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Types de tournois&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the most far-reaching amnesty plan teaming with a loser like Edward Kennedy qualify McCrap as conservative?</p>
<p>Flush the John-2008!!!<br />
<a href="http://sallesdepoker.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/types-de-tournois/" rel="nofollow">Types de tournois</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pastor Hagee's Comments Really Offend Me - Page 5 - The Political Hotwire</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-109786</link>
		<dc:creator>Pastor Hagee's Comments Really Offend Me - Page 5 - The Political Hotwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-109786</guid>
		<description>[...] with everything “Hagee might have said or positions that he may have taken on other issues.”    McCain defends Hagee endorsement despite differences  FOX Embeds  FOXNews.com  If you make the yuck face for the cameras right after kissing the ass, does that count?  And what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with everything “Hagee might have said or positions that he may have taken on other issues.”    McCain defends Hagee endorsement despite differences  FOX Embeds  FOXNews.com  If you make the yuck face for the cameras right after kissing the ass, does that count?  And what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This is Babylon &#187; Will McCain Reject? Will Jews Accept?</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-39826</link>
		<dc:creator>This is Babylon &#187; Will McCain Reject? Will Jews Accept?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-39826</guid>
		<description>[...] displeasure of having to deal with. As recently as this past weekend, McCain was making decisively pro-Hagee statements, saying: I am very proud of the Pastor John Hagee&#8217;s spiritual leadership to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] displeasure of having to deal with. As recently as this past weekend, McCain was making decisively pro-Hagee statements, saying: I am very proud of the Pastor John Hagee&#8217;s spiritual leadership to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hussein Ranger</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-38510</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hussein Ranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-38510</guid>
		<description>Where is Tim Russert when you need him? Obama had to jump hoops to reject and denounce Farrakhan but not only does John McCain has Hagee support, he's on the Two-Faced Express and doing introduction for him at Jerry Falwells Liberty University. If Obama even turned up with a cardboard cutout of Farrakhan on Obama One or to a rally, its game over. How friggin ridiculaous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is Tim Russert when you need him? Obama had to jump hoops to reject and denounce Farrakhan but not only does John McCain has Hagee support, he&#8217;s on the Two-Faced Express and doing introduction for him at Jerry Falwells Liberty University. If Obama even turned up with a cardboard cutout of Farrakhan on Obama One or to a rally, its game over. How friggin ridiculaous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-37877</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 05:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-37877</guid>
		<description>Last thing we need in the White House is a Black man begging for change....
in the words of lil bush</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last thing we need in the White House is a Black man begging for change&#8230;.<br />
in the words of lil bush</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Conservative</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-37418</link>
		<dc:creator>American Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-37418</guid>
		<description>Leroy:  It is obvious to do not want to respond to comments I raised proving you to be a religious bigot.  I did not expect you to.  You love to bear false witness, take things out of context, and then when confronted and encouraged to express your feelings of difference based upon what I posted, you hide behind your computer like a little coward.
Actually if you watched the William Buckley special on Fox the other day or ready any of his writings, he tried to flush religious bigots like you out of the conservative movement.  His goals were to flush out religious bigotry, racism, and communism (at the time) out of the movement as he saw this to be UNAMERICAN.  And I could not agree more with him.  
Good try Leroy to sound intelligent by using the great William Buckley's name, but we see through you.  By the way, it was his publication THE NATIONAL REVIEW, that he created in the 1950's and is still going strong today, that endorsed Mitt Romney for President.  He was still alive when they did and would have to be the one to give the final approval.
Once again, you show us all your intelligence level and reveal the type of religious bigot that you are.  It was a good try though Leroy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leroy:  It is obvious to do not want to respond to comments I raised proving you to be a religious bigot.  I did not expect you to.  You love to bear false witness, take things out of context, and then when confronted and encouraged to express your feelings of difference based upon what I posted, you hide behind your computer like a little coward.<br />
Actually if you watched the William Buckley special on Fox the other day or ready any of his writings, he tried to flush religious bigots like you out of the conservative movement.  His goals were to flush out religious bigotry, racism, and communism (at the time) out of the movement as he saw this to be UNAMERICAN.  And I could not agree more with him.<br />
Good try Leroy to sound intelligent by using the great William Buckley&#8217;s name, but we see through you.  By the way, it was his publication THE NATIONAL REVIEW, that he created in the 1950&#8217;s and is still going strong today, that endorsed Mitt Romney for President.  He was still alive when they did and would have to be the one to give the final approval.<br />
Once again, you show us all your intelligence level and reveal the type of religious bigot that you are.  It was a good try though Leroy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-37415</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-37415</guid>
		<description>Seriously People, McCain has gotten into fights with some people on the religious right before, including Hagee...

If Hagee wants to endorse McCain despite the fact they disagree a lot, that's McCain's business, since he's trying to heal the rift between himself and the Religious right.  There is something called forgiveness.  I thought Christians were supposed to be able to forgive others for stupid things they've said in the past.


The difference between the Obama situation and the McCain situation is that, McCain isn't a friend of Hagee.  The people supporting Obama, (including a domestic terrorist) were all friends of Obama to begin with.  Seriously one of Obama's friends is a domestic terrorist that bombed police stations, the US Capital, and the Pentagon!  All Hagee has done has said some stupid things, Hagee has not carried out terrorist attacks.

I've followed this thing rather closely, and McCain has gotten into fights with the Religious Right before, over comments they've said.  If Hagee wishes to support McCain despite the fact McCain has publically denounced him in the past, then fine.  Hillary had to twist Obama's arm to get him to renounce that other guy's endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously People, McCain has gotten into fights with some people on the religious right before, including Hagee&#8230;</p>
<p>If Hagee wants to endorse McCain despite the fact they disagree a lot, that&#8217;s McCain&#8217;s business, since he&#8217;s trying to heal the rift between himself and the Religious right.  There is something called forgiveness.  I thought Christians were supposed to be able to forgive others for stupid things they&#8217;ve said in the past.</p>
<p>The difference between the Obama situation and the McCain situation is that, McCain isn&#8217;t a friend of Hagee.  The people supporting Obama, (including a domestic terrorist) were all friends of Obama to begin with.  Seriously one of Obama&#8217;s friends is a domestic terrorist that bombed police stations, the US Capital, and the Pentagon!  All Hagee has done has said some stupid things, Hagee has not carried out terrorist attacks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve followed this thing rather closely, and McCain has gotten into fights with the Religious Right before, over comments they&#8217;ve said.  If Hagee wishes to support McCain despite the fact McCain has publically denounced him in the past, then fine.  Hillary had to twist Obama&#8217;s arm to get him to renounce that other guy&#8217;s endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-37206</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-37206</guid>
		<description>Am Con,  William f. Buckley wold not be impressed, yada yada yada yada ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am Con,  William f. Buckley wold not be impressed, yada yada yada yada ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/29/mccain-defends-hagee-endorsement-despite-differences/#comment-37155</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 07:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1576#comment-37155</guid>
		<description>Boppert,

Can you write anything without the use of the words, "Cult," "Kool-aid," or "Jim Jones?"  You say you are trying to get us, "cult-members" to think for ourselves...do you really care about our welfare that much, or have you still not figured out how to express yourself without calling others names?  

You're trying to get us to, "think for ourselves?"  Does this mean we have to remain undecided like you...should we all jump in and try to make you write with originality or etiquette?  We all seem to have accepted your rude behavior...but you don't seem to respect the fact that we don't want to submit to your desire for us to think thoughts you consider acceptable...

Maybe you just haven't figured out yet, that most people aren't going to be hurt enough by your name-calling and rudeness to cave to your demands to think thoughts you consider acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boppert,</p>
<p>Can you write anything without the use of the words, &#8220;Cult,&#8221; &#8220;Kool-aid,&#8221; or &#8220;Jim Jones?&#8221;  You say you are trying to get us, &#8220;cult-members&#8221; to think for ourselves&#8230;do you really care about our welfare that much, or have you still not figured out how to express yourself without calling others names?  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re trying to get us to, &#8220;think for ourselves?&#8221;  Does this mean we have to remain undecided like you&#8230;should we all jump in and try to make you write with originality or etiquette?  We all seem to have accepted your rude behavior&#8230;but you don&#8217;t seem to respect the fact that we don&#8217;t want to submit to your desire for us to think thoughts you consider acceptable&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe you just haven&#8217;t figured out yet, that most people aren&#8217;t going to be hurt enough by your name-calling and rudeness to cave to your demands to think thoughts you consider acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
