Comments on: Hillary’s Loan: From a Weakness to a Strength

By: Clinton Loaned Campaign $6.4 Million « FOX Embeds « FOXNews.com

Clinton Loaned Campaign $6.4 Million « FOX Embeds « FOXNews.com — Thu, 08 May 2008 01:26:38 +0000

[...] were low before Super Tuesday, crediting that donation with saving her floundering campaign and prompting a flood of new donations from supporters who hadn’t known she was in need of [...]

By: cheryl

cheryl — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:28:46 +0000

I wonder why the media has not QUESTION or even made PUBLIC in this Campaign
about the FRAUD that had taken place in Hillary Clintons (2000) SENATE CAMPAIGN. Hillary Clinton reported to the ” FEC” on JAN 21ST, 2006 that ( $225,000.00 ) was contributed by STAN LEE, in which he ” SWEARS “under ” OATH ” that he did not contribute anything to her compaign,
which contradicts her report that was made by her to the ” FEC “.

How did she NOT KNOW that her CAMPAIGN TREASURER ANDREW GROSSMAN admitted to
the FEC that he ” HID ” CONTRIBUTIONS of more than ( $720,000.00 ) made by PETER PAUL ?

Is it her ” EXPERIENCE ” that allows her not to be held ” ACCOUNTABLE ” for the FALSE REPORTS that was made to the ” FEC ” by herself and Andrew Grossman?

Is it her ” EXPERIENCE ” that allows her not to be held ” ACCOUNTABLE ” for what’s being done in her compaign? Go to hillcap.org and read it for yourself.

Is this who the people want to hire for ” PRESIDENT ” ? It seems to me that her ” EXPERIENCE”
is also call ‘FRUAD”. If she cannot ” MANAGE ” her Campaign, How can she pick up the RED PHONE and handle a crisis? The people deserves to know.

By: whydidyoudoit

whydidyoudoit — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:48:07 +0000

The Clinton campaign didn’t have a healthcare plan befor it felled and they don’t have one now. Well to be honest, if everyone is a goverment employee, then the Clinton healthcare plan will work for everyone. Unfortunately some are self employed, independent contractors or work for private employors or small business. Under the Clinton healthcare plan these people would be penalized if they don’t pay for their healthcare. This means that most of your family members and friends will have their paychecks garnished. We all know that it doesn’t stop there if it is a goverment enforcement. There will be fines and then misdemeanors which is a criminal offense defined as less serious than a felony. Why did Ms. Clinton decide on this approach? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Big business, big Corporation call it what you will, they want their money back and in order for Ms. Clinton to get their support in her race to presidency she is giving victory to one side (the healthcare providers) by promising to them that she will have the poeople wages garnished if they continue to give healthcare. Thus allowing her to shout the words “UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE” This is a shady tactic and makes fools out of every american that falls for this trick. The Obama healthcare plan is for the people. Poor people, middle class and rich people can rest assured that there is no tricks or penalties in the Obama healthcare plan. VOTE OBAMA!!

By: Southern girl

Southern girl — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:09:58 +0000

Carl,
It seems very few people share your opinion. Could it be that your ego just can’t handle a woman in the white house? She clearly is the most qualified candidate. Obama simply does not have enough experience. He talks and preaches a good game but I like a little meat and potatoes on my plate, he offers no substance. I think Obama may make a good VP which will give him the experience he needs, but right now we need to put our country in capable experienced hands.

By: Southern girl

Southern girl — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:04:14 +0000

Kerry Marvin,
Could you please just write your own opinions and stop copying and pasting these long speeches? Seriously, I am sure there are many people like me that just skip or scroll down and don’t bother to read your comments. I’m sorry, its just very annoying!!

By: Definnitely Hillary

Definnitely Hillary — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:19:15 +0000

The explanation is easy: AMERICANS LOVE HILLARY!!! Despite some Hillary haters spreading poison out there, we use our conscience in picking and backing the best candidate in the race. When Hillary needs help, we are more than happy to help.

By: Carl

Carl — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:29:55 +0000

I don’t believe a word that comes out of her mouth. Romney funded his own, why not Hillary. This is clearly just a cheap ploy to gain sympathy among her supporters. She’s good… at lying, cheating, and convincing a very gullible following that this is real.

By: DB

DB — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:38:30 +0000

Dear SaraSota,

While I will agree that Saddam Hussein did not have anything to do with the events of 9/11, there was credible evidence that his regime would support the terrorist through the supply of weapons of mass destruction or by harboring them within his borders. It’s important to note that this information or intelligence if you will was brought to the USA through multiple countries to include France, Germany, and the Russians and our biggest mistake was trusting that intel without verification. Regardless though, there is little doubt the world is better off without Saddam and even less doubt that the front lines of the war on terrorism is now in Iraq.

So with regards to williamscott getting his facts straight, I would suggest you stop hiding within the weak arguments of the past, focus on the reality of the day, and hope that whomever leads this country in the future recognizes that fighting the war on foreign land is far better then on our own.

By: SaraSota

SaraSota — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:00:06 +0000

Dear William Stotts,
The last I heard Osama bin Ladin and 19 Saudis attacked the WTC on 9/11, not Saddam Hussein and Iraq. Iraq did not attack the USA. I’ll not deny that he was a dangerous despot, but one can not blame him for 9/11 and justify an invasion because of it. Hillary has pledged to goafter terrorism whereever it is found and terrorism is not always state sponsored. Get your facts straight.

By: williamstotts

williamstotts — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:48:21 +0000

I recently heard Hillary say that if she had been President in ‘03, she would not have started this war. First of, and let me make this perfectly clear Ms Clinton. We (America) did NOT start this war. If you will recall, there were 3000 Americans killed on 9/11 and I am sure each of them would appreciate your comments today. Now, that brings me to the question; How many more attacks on America, how many more lives would have to be lost before you decided it was time to do the RIGHT thing? Where would you prefer to fight this war? I did not hear anyone ask OSAMA and Muhammad Atta to do what they did. Bottom line is if Bill Clinton would have done what he should have done after the first WTC attack and after the USS Cole not to mention the Towers in Saudi Arabia, I might not be having to type this message today. SO answer me this, HOW MUCH WOULD IT HAVE COST AMERICA HAD YOU BEEN PRESIDENT IN ‘03., HOW MUCH WILL IT COST AMERICA IF YOU OR OBAMA DO MANGE TO SLIP UNDER THE RADAR OF EDUCATED AMERICAN VOTERS IN ‘08? HOW MUCH