LET’S SEE HILLARY’S TAX STATEMENT, BILL. ALL THE MONEY IS MINE, ALL YOUR MONEY IS HERS TOO. SO SHE LOANS HER CAMPAIGN SOME MONEY? MITT SPENT A LOT OF HIS, DOES HE NOW CALL THAT A LOAN TOO? AND GET’S IT, ALL 40 MIL BACK TOO?
OR AS ; A WRITE OFF ON HIS, TAXES?

WHILE, DEAN AND THE DNC SEE THE TRAIN COMMING? AND BILL SUPPORTS HILLARY, BUT CAN’T DEFEND HER? YOU WANT TRANSPARANCY IN THE RELEASE OF INCOME TAX RECORDS, OBAMA? WELL YOU ALL HAVE A DOUBLE STANDARD THEN DON’T YOU? IT’S NOT ABOUT THE DEFENSE OF THIS COUNTRY, ONLY THE DEFENSE OF THE DEMOCRATS RIGHT TO PRIVACY.

BUT FULL DISCLOSURE FOR ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS? ; POLICY’S PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES!

RIGHT, BILL. YOU CAN NOT DEFEND HER? AND SEE THE “A” TRAIN WRECK COMMING?
WHILE YOU PLAY, AT BEING THE PREZ AGAIN ON YOUR JUMBO SAX (YES I SPELLED THAT RIGHT TOO!) , MACHINE?

” BECAUSE YOU ARE JUST AS CULPABLE” FOR ALL IF NOT, MOST OF HER NEW GAME POLICY.
AND PARDON ME? MAKE ME “MARK” RICH? AND REMEMBER THE “PARDON THE PORTO RICAN LIBERATION FRONT?”THAT WILL HELP WITH PORTO RICO STUMPING.

BUT WASHINGTON DC?
AND THE REST OF AMERICA? I THINK THEY REMEBER TOO.
SO, SAYING, BUT “WE” , DO REMEBER YOUR COLLUSION AND DELUSIONS OF GRANDER!

WHATS GOOD FOR THE GOOSE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER TOO.

WELL, HAVING SOME FEEDBACK ARE WE? AND PEOPLE, IE: THE MEDIA ARE PICKING ON CHELSIE TOO? AND EVERYONE KNOWS THAT’S NOT ALLOWED. SO NO DEBATE ON MSNBC?

IT’S MORE LIKE BLOWBACK FROM THE FIRESTORM!

THERE ARE MORE FLAMES COMING OUT OF EARS AND SMOKE AND MIRRORS THAN THE PYRO-
TECHNICS AT THE FORTH OF JULY AND NEW YEARS CELEBRATIONS COMBINED.

OBAMA WILL DO A MITT, AND HILLBILLY WILLY-NILLY WITH TRUE-LOL, AND THEN SHRILL HER GLEE TOO!

ONLY IT WON’T BE FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT SHE WILL TRY TO FOOL, IT WILL BE HER OWN, PARTY.
AND IT WILL BE A PITY PARTY IN THE END SO POOR HILLBILLARY, DEMS DA BREAKS!

AND SPEAKING OF BREAKS HOW ABOUT THE RUSH AND ANN COLTER USING THEM TOO.
SO WHAT THAT, McCAIN HAS TICKED THEM OFF ABOUT IMMIGRATION?
NO BIG DEAL, HOW MANY TIMES HAS WASHINGTON, BOTH THE LEFT AND THE RIGHT, TICKED THEM OFF?
GET OFF THEIR HIGH HORSE AND DO THE QUICK-STEP AROUND, ON THE SOUTH END’S LEAVINGS.
WHILE I’M AT IT. I HOPE THE POINT IS TO GIVE THE COUNTRY BACK TO:
“WE THE PEOPLE” NOT “WE THE MEDIA” PUNDIT’S.

TRY THIS ONE ON FOR SIZE TOO!

FIRST OF ALL, I AM A REPUBLICAN!
FOR AND ON, THE PRINCIPLE’S THAT THIS, REPUBLIC WAS FOUNDED ON.

FOR ALL THE DIFFERENCE IT WILL MAKE, THERE IS ONLY ONE:
CONCERN TO ME AND THIS NATION.

FIRST!
IS THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE BORDERS.

SECOND,
THEN THE WAR ON TERROR.

WITHOUT THE FIRST THEN THERE IS NO SECURITY FROM THE SECOND,
IE: THE OUTSIDE INFLUENCES THAT THREATEN THIS COUNTRY.

THIRD,
COMES THE OATH OF OFFICE, EVERY CONGRESSMAN OR WOMAN AND SENATOR TAKES;
TO DEFEND THIS NATION FROM ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.

THEREFORE, FOURTH,

I CHARGE THIS: AND THAT IT IS: “TREASON.”
FOR NOT FUFILLING THEIR OATH, OF OFFICE IN DIRECT AND WILLFUL, NEGLECT OF,
AND WITH CONTEMPT FOR THEIR DERELICTION OF DUTY.

THIS IS THE ONLY REAL ENFORCABLE CHARGE, TO LIE:
AT THE FEET OF THIS CONGRESS AND SENATE.

I CALL FOR THE IMPEACHING FOR, TREASON! ;
IN TOTAL OF BOTH HOUSES OF THE CONGRESS AND SENATE.

TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES AND TO THE OFFICE!
AND THE OATH, THEY SWORE UPON TAKING THAT OFFICE!
AND TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, AND INACTION TO DEFEND OUR BORDERS,
THE COUNTRY,
AND OUR CONSTITUTION IN THAT ORDER.

THE BORDER FENCE WAS APPROVED AND PASSED.
THE FUNDING WAS ALSO MADE AVAILABLE,
BUT LIKE KATRINA, IT ISN’T BEING COMPLETED FOR POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY
OR PARTY OBJECTIONS.

FOR THEIR LACK OF ACTION IN THE FACE OF THE INVASION OF OUR COUNTRY!
BY THE ILLEGAL ALIENS AND FOREIGN INTERESTS WITH THE COUNTRY MEXICO IN COLLUSION;
AND WITH THE APPROVAL, OF THE DEMOCRAT’S IN CONGRESS. ALSO: FOR THEIR FAILURE TO:
STOP THIS AGGRESSIVE ATTACK ON THIS COUNTRY; BY THE DRUG LORDS AND MEXICAN GOVERNMENT;
WHO, ASSISTED THIS: ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!

FIFTH:
I CHARGE THEM TO SECURE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND OURSELVES IAW WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT;
AND THE VIOLATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT;
BY SEIZURE OF AMERICAN, PROPERTY. THIS ACT: TO STOP THE COURTS FROM GIVING:
THE ILLEGAL ALIEN’S OUR PROPERTY FROM AND FOR THE, INDIVIDUALS WHOM ARE,
JUST ATTEMPTING SELF DEFENCE OF HEARTH AND LIFE AND DEFENDING IT.

SIXTH;
THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF THE BORDER AGENTS INCARCERATED FOR AND ON TRUMPED UP CHARGES;
BY AND,ON THE WORD OF DRUG CARTEL DEALERS AND THE CORRUPT DA’S OFFICE IN THE INCARCERATION;
OF OUR BORDER AGENTS FOR DEFENDING THEMSELVES AND OUR BORDERS ON,
THE SAME RIGHTS FOR AND ON OATH THEY UPHELD OR ATTEMPTED TO..

LAST I WILL LEAVE WITH THIS:

“GOOD FENCES MAKE GOOD NEIGHBORS!” THERE ARE “LEGAL”
IMMIGRATION PROCEDURES.

IF YOU VOTE, OR EVEN IF YOU DON’T.

ALSO NOTE THERE WILL BE MORE OF THIS GRASS ROOTS MOVEMENT TO SECURE
THIS NATION;
AND OUR BORDERS,
AND THE INDIVIDUAL INALIENABLE, RIGHTS!
OF “OUR CITIZENS” FROM THIS RELENTLESS INVASION.

CC: SEN JOHN McCAIN,
LOU DOBBS.COM

END TRANS: MARV!.

I recently heard Hillary say that if she had been President in ‘03, she would not have started this war. First of, and let me make this perfectly clear Ms Clinton. We (America) did NOT start this war. If you will recall, there were 3000 Americans killed on 9/11 and I am sure each of them would appreciate your comments today. Now, that brings me to the question; How many more attacks on America, how many more lives would have to be lost before you decided it was time to do the RIGHT thing? Where would you prefer to fight this war? I did not hear anyone ask OSAMA and Muhammad Atta to do what they did. Bottom line is if Bill Clinton would have done what he should have done after the first WTC attack and after the USS Cole not to mention the Towers in Saudi Arabia, I might not be having to type this message today. SO answer me this, HOW MUCH WOULD IT HAVE COST AMERICA HAD YOU BEEN PRESIDENT IN ‘03., HOW MUCH WILL IT COST AMERICA IF YOU OR OBAMA DO MANGE TO SLIP UNDER THE RADAR OF EDUCATED AMERICAN VOTERS IN ‘08? HOW MUCH

Dear William Stotts,
The last I heard Osama bin Ladin and 19 Saudis attacked the WTC on 9/11, not Saddam Hussein and Iraq. Iraq did not attack the USA. I’ll not deny that he was a dangerous despot, but one can not blame him for 9/11 and justify an invasion because of it. Hillary has pledged to goafter terrorism whereever it is found and terrorism is not always state sponsored. Get your facts straight.

Dear SaraSota,

While I will agree that Saddam Hussein did not have anything to do with the events of 9/11, there was credible evidence that his regime would support the terrorist through the supply of weapons of mass destruction or by harboring them within his borders. It’s important to note that this information or intelligence if you will was brought to the USA through multiple countries to include France, Germany, and the Russians and our biggest mistake was trusting that intel without verification. Regardless though, there is little doubt the world is better off without Saddam and even less doubt that the front lines of the war on terrorism is now in Iraq.

So with regards to williamscott getting his facts straight, I would suggest you stop hiding within the weak arguments of the past, focus on the reality of the day, and hope that whomever leads this country in the future recognizes that fighting the war on foreign land is far better then on our own.

I don’t believe a word that comes out of her mouth. Romney funded his own, why not Hillary. This is clearly just a cheap ploy to gain sympathy among her supporters. She’s good… at lying, cheating, and convincing a very gullible following that this is real.

The explanation is easy: AMERICANS LOVE HILLARY!!! Despite some Hillary haters spreading poison out there, we use our conscience in picking and backing the best candidate in the race. When Hillary needs help, we are more than happy to help.

Kerry Marvin,
Could you please just write your own opinions and stop copying and pasting these long speeches? Seriously, I am sure there are many people like me that just skip or scroll down and don’t bother to read your comments. I’m sorry, its just very annoying!!

Carl,
It seems very few people share your opinion. Could it be that your ego just can’t handle a woman in the white house? She clearly is the most qualified candidate. Obama simply does not have enough experience. He talks and preaches a good game but I like a little meat and potatoes on my plate, he offers no substance. I think Obama may make a good VP which will give him the experience he needs, but right now we need to put our country in capable experienced hands.

The Clinton campaign didn’t have a healthcare plan befor it felled and they don’t have one now. Well to be honest, if everyone is a goverment employee, then the Clinton healthcare plan will work for everyone. Unfortunately some are self employed, independent contractors or work for private employors or small business. Under the Clinton healthcare plan these people would be penalized if they don’t pay for their healthcare. This means that most of your family members and friends will have their paychecks garnished. We all know that it doesn’t stop there if it is a goverment enforcement. There will be fines and then misdemeanors which is a criminal offense defined as less serious than a felony. Why did Ms. Clinton decide on this approach? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Big business, big Corporation call it what you will, they want their money back and in order for Ms. Clinton to get their support in her race to presidency she is giving victory to one side (the healthcare providers) by promising to them that she will have the poeople wages garnished if they continue to give healthcare. Thus allowing her to shout the words “UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE” This is a shady tactic and makes fools out of every american that falls for this trick. The Obama healthcare plan is for the people. Poor people, middle class and rich people can rest assured that there is no tricks or penalties in the Obama healthcare plan. VOTE OBAMA!!

I wonder why the media has not QUESTION or even made PUBLIC in this Campaign
about the FRAUD that had taken place in Hillary Clintons (2000) SENATE CAMPAIGN. Hillary Clinton reported to the ” FEC” on JAN 21ST, 2006 that ( $225,000.00 ) was contributed by STAN LEE, in which he ” SWEARS “under ” OATH ” that he did not contribute anything to her compaign,
which contradicts her report that was made by her to the ” FEC “.

How did she NOT KNOW that her CAMPAIGN TREASURER ANDREW GROSSMAN admitted to
the FEC that he ” HID ” CONTRIBUTIONS of more than ( $720,000.00 ) made by PETER PAUL ?

Is it her ” EXPERIENCE ” that allows her not to be held ” ACCOUNTABLE ” for the FALSE REPORTS that was made to the ” FEC ” by herself and Andrew Grossman?

Is it her ” EXPERIENCE ” that allows her not to be held ” ACCOUNTABLE ” for what’s being done in her compaign? Go to hillcap.org and read it for yourself.

Is this who the people want to hire for ” PRESIDENT ” ? It seems to me that her ” EXPERIENCE”
is also call ‘FRUAD”. If she cannot ” MANAGE ” her Campaign, How can she pick up the RED PHONE and handle a crisis? The people deserves to know.

[...] were low before Super Tuesday, crediting that donation with saving her floundering campaign and prompting a flood of new donations from supporters who hadn’t known she was in need of [...]