1. McCain supports gay marriage, and was involved in the McCain Savings and Loan scandal that cost taxpayers HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
Check the facts - here is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

2. If he can’t secure our borders here in Arizona - how in the world is get going to protect our country?

i am voting for Mitt Romney!

As far as Huckabee securing the border– Just three months ago I personally heard Huckabee espouse the idea of,” Open borders, open arms”. Those were the EXACT words out of HIS mouth. He changed right in the middle of his campaign because his open border policy was SO rejected by the pundits. He knew he had NO chance of winning when he stood on his original position. Funny, I never heard anyone call him a flip flopper. But that is what he did. He openly fought and stands by today his desire to provide college scholarships for the children of illegals.

I could only chuckle at your assumption that Huckabee is best qualified to run a bloated bureaucracy. That is just absurd. With Romney’s dual degree in Law and business from Harvard finishing in the top 3% of his class. Romney has a life time of turning around sinking companies turning them into some of the most fiscally sound and profitable companies in the world. Enough said about that.

I could go on and on, but basically your post is full of errors. I sincerely hope you will do better homework.
http://www.evangelicalsformitt.org

Let’s examine some of the top issues among the two leading Republican candidates:

Bush Tax Cuts: McCain voted against them twice on liberal class warfare arguments that they gave too much to the rich. He has since lied that his opposition was tied to spending concerns. McCain can’t be trusted on tax cuts. Romney will never make this same argument.

Decision: Romney

Earmark Reform and Spending: BOTH Romney and McCain support vetoing bills with ear-marks. McCain can point to a few he’s killed, but in 24 years in the Senate he hasn’t done much to improve the overall situation. Romney, on the other hand, has *proven* an ability to balance a budget–including the one with a $3B gap in MA. Romney has already put out his position regarding holding non-defense spending at inflation less 1%. Further, he has astutely pointed out that the bigger problem is not the pork-barrel spending but the mess known as entitlement spending.

Decision: Romney, but McCain does get points for expressing strong opposition to pork-barrel spending

Judges: Despite his recent pledge to appoint Conservative judges, McCain has ridiculed Roberts for “wearing his Conservatism on his sleeve” and continues to love Sandra Day O’Connor. Romney is no fan of O’Connor and has expressed strong support for Alito and Roberts.

Decision: Romney

Trade and the Economy: McCain doesn’t hold a candle to Romney when it comes to understanding economics. He’s even admitted multiple times he doesn’t know much about economics. He’s never managed anything. In stark contrast, Romney has a stellar career of accomplishments.

Decision: Romney

Healthcare: McCain doesn’t hold a candle to Romney when it comes to understanding healthcare. I don’t know that I’ve ever even heard him utter the words. Romney is the only candidate of either party that has actually tackled this problem. Considering the Democrats have made this one of their leading issues, doesn’t it make sense to put up a candidate that can take this issue away. They can speculate all they want. Romney has already done it.

Decision: Romney

National Security: McCain clearly has military experience that Romney does not. He also has more experience with foreign policy. True. Romney, on the other hand, has much better temperament and has shown outstanding decision making ability throughout his career. Further, many have suggested he understands the current struggle against radical jihadists much better than most politicians. It’s no secret the Democrats will try to hang McCain with the war. Their base is extremely opposed and after Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld McCain is the highest profile poster child for the war.

Decision: Split, but leans toward Romney once you take it to the national election.

On six of the top seven issues, Romney is clearly more qualified than McCain and the seventh is even a toss-up.

Mitt Romney - a PROVEN LEADER with the EXPERIENCE to tackle and solve the problems Washington has left undone.

California is not winner takeall it is legislative district take all. McCain knows he loses OC and Hunters district in SD but he wins in N. Cal, LA and central valley. At the end of the day they probably split the delegates, not what I would call a loss for McCain or a win for Mitt. Besides it is no big deal when McCain is taking the large NE winner take all states. Besides going to MA is “taking a shot across Mitts bow”. Pure gamemanship to get in his head which worked because he promptly changed his schedule and shot back to CA. Politics is all about arrogance, do you think that any of these canidates on either side aren’t arrogant, please.

I am sure it is frustrating that Mitt’s faith is an issue but those who are making it an issue are the knee jerk, ultra conservative evangelical wackos in our party. Those are the same guys that Mitt has made himself over for, trying to be something he clearly isn’t at his core. The sad part is when you lie with dogs you generally come up with fleas and Mitt is going to see that not being who he is was not worth it. I think he betrayed his centrist mind for his ego, what a waste.

CHRISTIANS/EVANGELICALS DON’T VOTE FOR ROMNEY

GOD IS GOING TO BE ANGRY !!!!

Please Read;
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=60022

“Mitt Romney pushed through same-sex marriage all by himself, in the absence of any authority or requirement to do so, having a complete misunderstanding of his role as governor and of the significance of the court’s opinion,” said Keyes.

“The court never ordered him to act, nor did he have the right to act, since the legislature never changed the law. Romney claimed he had no other choice, but that’s completely untrue.”

Romney said;

“I promised that if elected, I’d call a truce - a moratorium, if you will…I vowed to veto any legislation that sought to change the existing rules…I fully respect and will fully protect a woman’s right to choose.”

(Taken fromm http://www.perrspectives.com).

He would rather lose CA for the satisfaction of playing hardball with Romney.

Lets try some economic math real quick. The Labor Department says that fully 5% of the jobs in the US are held by illegals of one type or another. The current national unemployment rate is just under 6%. If we can deport (big if but we can save the logistics model for another time) all of the 5% and replace them immediately with the 6% that we show as unemployed we will be at a net 1% unemployment right. Sounds good but wait, the jobs that the illegals are doing are by all accounts are paid at less than market. Assuming that the employers must pay higher wages plus the cost of training and disruption I think the answer is wage inflation which equates to high consumer prices and yes you guessed it higher interest rates. Sounds like a bargain so far and before you tout the costs of healthcare for illegals consider the people taking their place are just as uninsured as they are. You see Davey boy we conservatives have been burning the candle at both ends and now we want to have our cake and eat it too. Never works. I would rather get control of the border round ‘em u, fine 6K plus back taxes and keep our consumer price index under control. After all if we want the best of both worlds you have got to swallow hard and leave with a plan that keeps ‘em here under control or prepare to pay the costs in your daily life. Last thing try this calculation on the logistices side real quick. 12,000,000 times $10,000.00, that the cost per head minimum to round them up and deport them. Big number!