<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q: What do Mitt Romney and Barack Obama have in common?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-73274</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-73274</guid>
		<description>I couldn't understand some parts of this article FOXNews.com, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article FOXNews.com, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbr90k</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-53639</link>
		<dc:creator>pbr90k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 02:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-53639</guid>
		<description>The thing they have in common is the ability to use double talk to advantage, or inductive reasoning when deductive reasoning is called for, thereby twisting what is into what isn't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing they have in common is the ability to use double talk to advantage, or inductive reasoning when deductive reasoning is called for, thereby twisting what is into what isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KnowledgeIsPower</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19977</link>
		<dc:creator>KnowledgeIsPower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19977</guid>
		<description>Jay,

I'll...take...this...slow...now. I....am ....a .... taxpayer....
which means, I am paying taxes to subsidize something.

It doesn't mean the government owns ME. It means I'm paying for government
managed programs.

Nothing more, nothing less.

Okay?

You are telling me that you want the private insurance companies ( HMOs ) AND the federal government joining forces, to siphon off more money (subsidies = tax-supported ). And you expect the coverage to be CHEAPER and BETTER ??? No way. Just another layer of management
( or mismanagement, in my opinion).

If you want regulations and laws GOVERNING private healthcare, that's fine. But don't confuse
THAT with subsidized healthcare, which is what Shill-ary is offering.

I mean, crack open a history book, do a little browsing...please? ANYTHING? 

Study 1993, when Mrs President got appointed ( illegally, I might add ) to create
"socialized healthcare".

Look up "failure" and "flailing" in Webster's unabridged. You will see Hillary's profile.
Yeah, she really went down in flames.

It would be amusing ( "Hillarious???") listening to her wax eloquent about how she
"fixed healthcare" and how knowledgeable she is, IF there was no possibility of
her getting elected. 

"History Rewriter" is something she should add to her resume.

If you don't know what she's about, WHY are you voting for her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll&#8230;take&#8230;this&#8230;slow&#8230;now. I&#8230;.am &#8230;.a &#8230;. taxpayer&#8230;.<br />
which means, I am paying taxes to subsidize something.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t mean the government owns ME. It means I&#8217;m paying for government<br />
managed programs.</p>
<p>Nothing more, nothing less.</p>
<p>Okay?</p>
<p>You are telling me that you want the private insurance companies ( HMOs ) AND the federal government joining forces, to siphon off more money (subsidies = tax-supported ). And you expect the coverage to be CHEAPER and BETTER ??? No way. Just another layer of management<br />
( or mismanagement, in my opinion).</p>
<p>If you want regulations and laws GOVERNING private healthcare, that&#8217;s fine. But don&#8217;t confuse<br />
THAT with subsidized healthcare, which is what Shill-ary is offering.</p>
<p>I mean, crack open a history book, do a little browsing&#8230;please? ANYTHING? </p>
<p>Study 1993, when Mrs President got appointed ( illegally, I might add ) to create<br />
&#8220;socialized healthcare&#8221;.</p>
<p>Look up &#8220;failure&#8221; and &#8220;flailing&#8221; in Webster&#8217;s unabridged. You will see Hillary&#8217;s profile.<br />
Yeah, she really went down in flames.</p>
<p>It would be amusing ( &#8220;Hillarious???&#8221;) listening to her wax eloquent about how she<br />
&#8220;fixed healthcare&#8221; and how knowledgeable she is, IF there was no possibility of<br />
her getting elected. </p>
<p>&#8220;History Rewriter&#8221; is something she should add to her resume.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t know what she&#8217;s about, WHY are you voting for her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19947</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19947</guid>
		<description>Go Mitt go!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Mitt go!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not confused</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19809</link>
		<dc:creator>not confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19809</guid>
		<description>I will vote for Romney.  But I'm afraid the way these delegates are rigged up he won't get enough.  We need to change our election process but it will never happen because the winners like the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will vote for Romney.  But I&#8217;m afraid the way these delegates are rigged up he won&#8217;t get enough.  We need to change our election process but it will never happen because the winners like the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rowneynet</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19772</link>
		<dc:creator>rowneynet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19772</guid>
		<description>I wish I fully understood this expensive American Circus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I fully understood this expensive American Circus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19721</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19721</guid>
		<description>There is no difference between McCain and Senator Clinton except on the war. I have just come to the realization that Huckabee is staying in the race to further his evangelical career. I really don't think he has any intention of winning the presidency. I think it is very sad that he would care only about his selfish ambitions and not about the good of our country. I am a southern baptist and I have seen this kind of mentality in preachers too often.  Mitt Romney is the only conservative canditate on this ticket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no difference between McCain and Senator Clinton except on the war. I have just come to the realization that Huckabee is staying in the race to further his evangelical career. I really don&#8217;t think he has any intention of winning the presidency. I think it is very sad that he would care only about his selfish ambitions and not about the good of our country. I am a southern baptist and I have seen this kind of mentality in preachers too often.  Mitt Romney is the only conservative canditate on this ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G8</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19716</link>
		<dc:creator>G8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19716</guid>
		<description>It is a fact that Hillary Clinton put out a press release in 2001 supporting George Bush on his 

1. "No Child Left Behind" policy,
2. Iraq War

Her vote to go to War in Iraq was probably one of the biggest decisions a politician can make in their career.  She won't admit that it was a bad mistake and poor judgement to go to war in this case.  Thousands of people are still dying because of it.

Hillary Clinton has blood on her hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a fact that Hillary Clinton put out a press release in 2001 supporting George Bush on his </p>
<p>1. &#8220;No Child Left Behind&#8221; policy,<br />
2. Iraq War</p>
<p>Her vote to go to War in Iraq was probably one of the biggest decisions a politician can make in their career.  She won&#8217;t admit that it was a bad mistake and poor judgement to go to war in this case.  Thousands of people are still dying because of it.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton has blood on her hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin T</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19713</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19713</guid>
		<description>Jay, talk about painting over the mole.

The truth is Obama has been in elected office longer than Clinton. Hillary Clinton was elected to public office for the first time in the year 2000 and Barack Obama, 1997. Obama was elect to the U.S. Senate less than a few years after Clinton was elected.

You want to talk about Clinton self proclaimed experience. But the Clintons refuse to release the documents which her so called experience are based. What is she hiding? While Obama was putting forth legislations to help our economy for working Americans, Clinton was involved in sending our jobs overseas. Clinton is also in bed with lobbyist that will see nothing gets done if she is elected (God forbids).  Clinton’s Fraudulent fund raising practices is another reason you should reconsider your support, and don’t mention Rezko because Clinton was also involved with him.  Check your facts. Please see youtube.com/watch?v=QPxtv6kcn7s

On healthcare, Hillary wants to fine, garnish wages, and possibly arrest those who cannot afford her flawed health care system proposal.  Contrary to Hillary’s Care which has previously failed, Obama believes in a different approach because he understands clearly the issue. Obama believes in free market economy which the backbone of this country is based upon. Obama believes we need to keep our private health care system and subsidies affordable care to drive competition and thereby lowering cost. See barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/ 

On National Security, Obama has demonstrated wisdom and perception over the years. Clinton voted for the Iraqi war, and after recognizing the information which she didn’t study or read before casting her vote was flawed, she refuses to acknowledge her vote was a mistake. She recently also voted to use aggression against Iran. Does she ever read the resolutions before voting or her votes are always politically calculated? See dni.gov/press_releases/20071203_release.pdf                                                                                                                     Obama believes we need to engage our enemies in conversations just as president Reagan and his predecessors did.  “The weak is ruled by the strong, but the strong is ruled by intelligent.” This is how the cold war was won. It was through intelligence.  

Hillary Clinton is not right for this Job. 

Barack Obama is not indebted to favor, he is clean, and uncorrupt. And yes we can http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, talk about painting over the mole.</p>
<p>The truth is Obama has been in elected office longer than Clinton. Hillary Clinton was elected to public office for the first time in the year 2000 and Barack Obama, 1997. Obama was elect to the U.S. Senate less than a few years after Clinton was elected.</p>
<p>You want to talk about Clinton self proclaimed experience. But the Clintons refuse to release the documents which her so called experience are based. What is she hiding? While Obama was putting forth legislations to help our economy for working Americans, Clinton was involved in sending our jobs overseas. Clinton is also in bed with lobbyist that will see nothing gets done if she is elected (God forbids).  Clinton’s Fraudulent fund raising practices is another reason you should reconsider your support, and don’t mention Rezko because Clinton was also involved with him.  Check your facts. Please see youtube.com/watch?v=QPxtv6kcn7s</p>
<p>On healthcare, Hillary wants to fine, garnish wages, and possibly arrest those who cannot afford her flawed health care system proposal.  Contrary to Hillary’s Care which has previously failed, Obama believes in a different approach because he understands clearly the issue. Obama believes in free market economy which the backbone of this country is based upon. Obama believes we need to keep our private health care system and subsidies affordable care to drive competition and thereby lowering cost. See barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/ </p>
<p>On National Security, Obama has demonstrated wisdom and perception over the years. Clinton voted for the Iraqi war, and after recognizing the information which she didn’t study or read before casting her vote was flawed, she refuses to acknowledge her vote was a mistake. She recently also voted to use aggression against Iran. Does she ever read the resolutions before voting or her votes are always politically calculated? See dni.gov/press_releases/20071203_release.pdf                                                                                                                     Obama believes we need to engage our enemies in conversations just as president Reagan and his predecessors did.  “The weak is ruled by the strong, but the strong is ruled by intelligent.” This is how the cold war was won. It was through intelligence.  </p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is not right for this Job. </p>
<p>Barack Obama is not indebted to favor, he is clean, and uncorrupt. And yes we can <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmulcahy</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/03/q-what-do-mitt-romney-and-barack-obama-have-in-common/#comment-19700</link>
		<dc:creator>tmulcahy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=1051#comment-19700</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree with Romney that McCain and Clinton have similar policies in getting out (or not getting out) of Iraq.  Although I think Libertarian ideas are ludicrous, I'd vote for Ron Paul over either of those two, if those are the only choices I'll have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with Romney that McCain and Clinton have similar policies in getting out (or not getting out) of Iraq.  Although I think Libertarian ideas are ludicrous, I&#8217;d vote for Ron Paul over either of those two, if those are the only choices I&#8217;ll have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
