<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Excited About Bush&#8217;s State of the Union</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nice Try</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-13258</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice Try</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-13258</guid>
		<description>Well, Hillary was wrong as usual.  Bush made his 'state of the union will be strong if...' statement conditional on folks like Hillary and Pelosi becoming a little more reasonable.  

I can't wait until we get to see her screeching, shrieking  public meltdown when she fully realizes that Obama has it in the bag for the DemNom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Hillary was wrong as usual.  Bush made his &#8217;state of the union will be strong if&#8230;&#8217; statement conditional on folks like Hillary and Pelosi becoming a little more reasonable.  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait until we get to see her screeching, shrieking  public meltdown when she fully realizes that Obama has it in the bag for the DemNom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-13153</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-13153</guid>
		<description>I must agree with James Marshall on Mike.  Mike has had too much of the kool-aid.

Mike: "As it is today they terrorists plots have been prevented due to PRESIDENT BUSH’S plan to keep America safe."

LOL! 
According to the 9/11 commission, the Clinton administation warned the Bush adminstration that a man they once considered a personal friend was now America's ONLY enemy.  
Did Bush keep us safe???? NO!
Instead, he pulled out the old, dusty maps of Iraq and went after his and Cheney's OLD enemy, the guy who "tried to kill his daddy."

Because of Bush's "plan" we are less safe.
And because of Bush's "plan" we are less free.
For most Americans, Mike, that makes Bush's "plan" a complete failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with James Marshall on Mike.  Mike has had too much of the kool-aid.</p>
<p>Mike: &#8220;As it is today they terrorists plots have been prevented due to PRESIDENT BUSH’S plan to keep America safe.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL!<br />
According to the 9/11 commission, the Clinton administation warned the Bush adminstration that a man they once considered a personal friend was now America&#8217;s ONLY enemy.<br />
Did Bush keep us safe???? NO!<br />
Instead, he pulled out the old, dusty maps of Iraq and went after his and Cheney&#8217;s OLD enemy, the guy who &#8220;tried to kill his daddy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Because of Bush&#8217;s &#8220;plan&#8221; we are less safe.<br />
And because of Bush&#8217;s &#8220;plan&#8221; we are less free.<br />
For most Americans, Mike, that makes Bush&#8217;s &#8220;plan&#8221; a complete failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of the Union 2008 &#124; Monopoly Men</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-13017</link>
		<dc:creator>State of the Union 2008 &#124; Monopoly Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-13017</guid>
		<description>[...] at Fox News.com Aaron Bruns has the misleadingly titled article “Hillary Excited By Bush’s State of the Union”. To be fair (and balanced), it may have been a sub-editor who came up with this attention-grabbing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Fox News.com Aaron Bruns has the misleadingly titled article “Hillary Excited By Bush’s State of the Union”. To be fair (and balanced), it may have been a sub-editor who came up with this attention-grabbing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-13006</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-13006</guid>
		<description>Go Hillary. I liked her style there. Keep getting good sleep, eat right, &#38; exercise, Hillary. This is you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Hillary. I liked her style there. Keep getting good sleep, eat right, &amp; exercise, Hillary. This is you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian haines</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-12977</link>
		<dc:creator>brian haines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-12977</guid>
		<description>we are not interested in having the clinton's in the white house again. 8 years of immorality and stupidity was enough for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are not interested in having the clinton&#8217;s in the white house again. 8 years of immorality and stupidity was enough for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-12970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-12970</guid>
		<description>Wow!  Is this an actual presidential candidate?  Where was this chick when Bill was having relations with his intern.  Let us remember Clinton only as the most popular president that did nothing but ride the economic wave brought on by a victory overseas.  Show me someone worth voting for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Is this an actual presidential candidate?  Where was this chick when Bill was having relations with his intern.  Let us remember Clinton only as the most popular president that did nothing but ride the economic wave brought on by a victory overseas.  Show me someone worth voting for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Presidential Candidates</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-12952</link>
		<dc:creator>The Presidential Candidates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-12952</guid>
		<description>I must agree with Hillary Clinton on this one. The only good thing about this State of the Union is that it is Bush's last. We can finally begin rinsing ourselves clean of the worst president in the history of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with Hillary Clinton on this one. The only good thing about this State of the Union is that it is Bush&#8217;s last. We can finally begin rinsing ourselves clean of the worst president in the history of the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hollypw</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-12945</link>
		<dc:creator>Hollypw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-12945</guid>
		<description>If anyone running for office of the President of the United States can't even respect the current holder of that office, (I didn't say like or dislike, I said "respect" ) how can that person except anyone to respect them when they are in office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone running for office of the President of the United States can&#8217;t even respect the current holder of that office, (I didn&#8217;t say like or dislike, I said &#8220;respect&#8221; ) how can that person except anyone to respect them when they are in office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WPDAILY</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-12942</link>
		<dc:creator>WPDAILY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-12942</guid>
		<description>Sounds more like it to me Kay!!!

*******Because it takes affirmative votes to pass legislation in the Illinois Senate, a "present" vote is tantamount to a "no" vote. A "present" vote is generally used to provide political cover for legislators who don't want to be on the record against a bill that they oppose. Of course, Obama isn't the first or only Illinois state senator to vote "present," but he is the only one running for President of the United States. **********

NICE TACTIC!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds more like it to me Kay!!!</p>
<p>*******Because it takes affirmative votes to pass legislation in the Illinois Senate, a &#8220;present&#8221; vote is tantamount to a &#8220;no&#8221; vote. A &#8220;present&#8221; vote is generally used to provide political cover for legislators who don&#8217;t want to be on the record against a bill that they oppose. Of course, Obama isn&#8217;t the first or only Illinois state senator to vote &#8220;present,&#8221; but he is the only one running for President of the United States. **********</p>
<p>NICE TACTIC!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WPDAILY</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/28/hillary-excited-about-bushs-state-of-the-union/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>WPDAILY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.wordpress.com/?p=945#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>Kay......why don't you enlighten us? What does the "present" vote mean?  What is the point of electing someone who shows up to work, but doesn't do the job?????  There were ALOT of present votes there. Ever heard of C.Y.A. That's what the "present" vote seems to mean. If he doesn't state his opinion, no one can use it against him when running for president or other offices. MEH.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kay&#8230;&#8230;why don&#8217;t you enlighten us? What does the &#8220;present&#8221; vote mean?  What is the point of electing someone who shows up to work, but doesn&#8217;t do the job?????  There were ALOT of present votes there. Ever heard of C.Y.A. That&#8217;s what the &#8220;present&#8221; vote seems to mean. If he doesn&#8217;t state his opinion, no one can use it against him when running for president or other offices. MEH&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
