Who Hates the New York Times the Most?
Boca Raton, FL–
It’s not a surprise given the GOP hatred for the Gray Lady that the Rudy and Romney camps would jump on the New York Times endorsement of John McCain. But, the Giuliani campaign beat the Romney camp in sending out the “In Case You Missed It” highlighting the endorsement. While walking into the debate the Romney camp chuckled learning of the endorsement saying THEY were going to put out an “In Case You Missed It” on it.
It makes sense that they didn’t send it because it goes after the former Massachusetts governor, but that is nothing compared to what it says about Rudy. Read below:
“The real Mr. Giuliani, whom many New Yorkers came to know and mistrust, is a narrow, obsessively secretive, vindictive man who saw no need to limit police power. Racial polarization was as much a legacy of his tenure as the rebirth of Times Square.”
“Mr. Giuliani’s arrogance and bad judgment are breathtaking. When he claims fiscal prudence, we remember how he ran through surpluses without a thought to the inevitable downturn and bequeathed huge deficits to his successor. He fired Police Commissioner William Bratton, the architect of the drop in crime, because he couldn’t share the limelight. He later gave the job to Bernard Kerik, who has now been indicted on fraud and corruption charges.”
“The Rudolph Giuliani of 2008 first shamelessly turned the horror of 9/11 into a lucrative business, with a secret client list, then exploited his city’s and the country’s nightmare to promote his presidential campaign.”
“The other candidates offer no better choices.”
“Mitt Romney’s shape-shifting rivals that of Mr. Giuliani. It is hard to find an issue on which he has not repositioned himself to the right since he was governor of Massachusetts. It is impossible to figure out where he stands or where he would lead the country.”
Tags: Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani
Share
What I am most concerned about is the lack of coverage for Ron Paul. Richardson was my candidate, so I know how it feels to be left out.
Current question count:
McCain - 11
Romney - 9
Guiliani - 6
Huckabee - 5
Paul - 2
What the heck is going on here?
It will be impossible to learn where any candidate stands on the issues… IF YOU DON’T LISTEN. Obviously the NYT only listen to democrats or would be democrats like McCain.
the new york times e and the debacle that was john mccain tonight, certainly did not help mccain !! he looked like a boob !!!!
He is a boob and his record sucks! He is the most liberal among the group and we true conservatives don’t care for him much!
The New York Times got it right, and actually seems to care about the candidates stances, not just how pretty their words sound. Hopefully it won’t be long until it’s down to just Romney, McCain, and Clinton. Then you can watch the mormon and the moron lose while the true woman for our country wins.
Jack,
You wish. Hillary can’t even win 50% of the vote being uncontested. Keep your rose colored glasses on and your kool-aid cup full, while the rest of us pick a real leader!!
Shannon, it’s ironic that you think my glasses are rose-colored when yours are smeared with the feces that spews from your gaping maw. Hillary Clinton is consistently winning the primaries. In almost every poll of nominees, Hillary wins. She is the candidate that America wants, and The Times was spot on with their analysis. I only wish they had turned their gaze to Obama’s pointless tripe of a campaign. Maybe then the press could have actually shown him to be without a shred of substance.
I have no illusions about your hatred for Hillary. I just happen to not care, and think that she would do the best job for America, while other candidates would only serve themselves. So hate her all you want like a good little hypocrite, I’ll still be voting while you’ll continue fusing your rear end to your couch while eating bonbons.
the new york times… Losing subscribers faster than any whack o, socialist, out of touch paper in the nation. Their endorsement might appeal to toads. otherwise, I dont think their relevence is near what they think it may be. Real conservatives wouldn’t be caught RED handed with that paper..
I do and their endorsement of McAmnesty proves he’s a Lib.
Jeeeeze Jack—
Maybe Hill should hire you!!!
Jack & Hill should check out Pakistan–I’m sure she would be well taken care of there.
You are a typical angry frothing liberal so full of hatred for America that you want to see how fast Billary can turn us into a turd world country. You can’t possibly think she would do this country good. What do you like best about her? The trail of dead people she left in her rise to power or the earmarks for the needle exchange program?
Jack
I am all for a woman being president as I am a woman myself..I just want the right woman..and it is not Hillary. I have nothing personal against her, I do not even know her to get personal. I just know that everything that comes out of her or her husband’s mouth is lies and they can never back up what they claim with FACT. I know they take dirty money..HSU ring any bells…?? What’s really scary is that they both believe their own lies…what is that old expression..keep on lying and someday you might just believe it. Her husband lies under oath and was impeached only to be acquitted by the political left and finish his term in disgrace. We don’t need him or any woman who decides to stay with him being in charge of a country that is looking for pride in leadership. She could not even come close.
By the way, I will be happy to sit on my couch and eat Bon bons..except that I am too busy working, going to school and raising a 10 year old that I just don’t have the time.
“Who hates the New York Times the Most” I think nobody hates an old news paper with no credibilty endorsing a conservative views. New York Times just irrelevant.