<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney Lessens Expectations in South Carolina</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PolitiPornster</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5658</link>
		<dc:creator>PolitiPornster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5658</guid>
		<description>V Racer makes a good point, but apparently the GOP is not immune to this pandering syndrome.  One of the GOP campaign has decided that it would be helpful to SwiftBoat a national hero like John McCain - read here - http://www.politiporn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V Racer makes a good point, but apparently the GOP is not immune to this pandering syndrome.  One of the GOP campaign has decided that it would be helpful to SwiftBoat a national hero like John McCain - read here - <a href="http://www.politiporn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.politiporn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V Racer</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5640</link>
		<dc:creator>V Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5640</guid>
		<description>Raise the quality of the rhetoric folks. It is going to be a nightmare general election and there is a lot to lose. Obama would give our security for a vote, Edwards would give our economy for a vote, and Hillary would give anything for a vote. Let's civily nominate the best conservative Republican possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raise the quality of the rhetoric folks. It is going to be a nightmare general election and there is a lot to lose. Obama would give our security for a vote, Edwards would give our economy for a vote, and Hillary would give anything for a vote. Let&#8217;s civily nominate the best conservative Republican possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ, Iowa City, IA</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5526</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ, Iowa City, IA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5526</guid>
		<description>Romney '08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney &#8216;08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5436</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5436</guid>
		<description>Willard Romney is an out and out lier. He'll say anything at any time too get a vote. In the Michigan primary, John McCain at least told them stright up that the auto industry needed to change and that it would never be back too it's hey day situation. What does Willard do? He tells them that he'll ease the "new restrictions for fleet mileage and fuel ecconomy" as a way of fixing the auto industry!  You've got to be kidding me Mitt!  How short sighted is that!  Romney is the biggest flip flopper in history. He just says whatever it takes to lie his way too a vote.  Watch what happens when issues on Greenhouse gasses or emmisions come onto the table.  You'll never hear a word about "easing fleet mileage standards then.  This guy is a talking head. He's like the used car salesman parodies. He'll say anything too sell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willard Romney is an out and out lier. He&#8217;ll say anything at any time too get a vote. In the Michigan primary, John McCain at least told them stright up that the auto industry needed to change and that it would never be back too it&#8217;s hey day situation. What does Willard do? He tells them that he&#8217;ll ease the &#8220;new restrictions for fleet mileage and fuel ecconomy&#8221; as a way of fixing the auto industry!  You&#8217;ve got to be kidding me Mitt!  How short sighted is that!  Romney is the biggest flip flopper in history. He just says whatever it takes to lie his way too a vote.  Watch what happens when issues on Greenhouse gasses or emmisions come onto the table.  You&#8217;ll never hear a word about &#8220;easing fleet mileage standards then.  This guy is a talking head. He&#8217;s like the used car salesman parodies. He&#8217;ll say anything too sell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupendous</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5371</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupendous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5371</guid>
		<description>Huckabee isn't what he claims to be....


http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/33391ddb-ed1f-4bc3-9d19-cdca6181d5d4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huckabee isn&#8217;t what he claims to be&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/33391ddb-ed1f-4bc3-9d19-cdca6181d5d4" rel="nofollow">http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/33391ddb-ed1f-4bc3-9d19-cdca6181d5d4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupendous</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5370</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupendous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5370</guid>
		<description>Huckabee is crazy...

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huckabee is crazy&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html" rel="nofollow">http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stupendous</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5368</link>
		<dc:creator>Stupendous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5368</guid>
		<description>I don't think I would have been so nice in speaking about Huckabee.  He's really scaring me.

He want's to merge church and state...

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html

He's more like a wolf in sheep's clothing...

http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/33391ddb-ed1f-4bc3-9d19-cdca6181d5d4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I would have been so nice in speaking about Huckabee.  He&#8217;s really scaring me.</p>
<p>He want&#8217;s to merge church and state&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html" rel="nofollow">http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Huckabee_Amend_Constitution_to_meet_Gods_0115.html</a></p>
<p>He&#8217;s more like a wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/33391ddb-ed1f-4bc3-9d19-cdca6181d5d4" rel="nofollow">http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/33391ddb-ed1f-4bc3-9d19-cdca6181d5d4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5326</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5326</guid>
		<description>I don't think there is a bigger hypocrite when it comes to conservative record than FRED THOMPSON:

Consider this record—a record that includes these votes:

? FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998.

? FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000.

? AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999.

? AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001.

? FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995.

? FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996.

? AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997.

? FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995.

? FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999.

? FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996.

? FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998.

? FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000.

? FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999.

? AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001.

? AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997.

? FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997.

? FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002.

And, last but not least:

? FOR limitations on campaign freedom of speech, by limiting contributions to national political parties to $2,000 and limiting the rights of individuals and groups to participate in the political process in the two months before elections. See ACU’s vote 7, 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is a bigger hypocrite when it comes to conservative record than FRED THOMPSON:</p>
<p>Consider this record—a record that includes these votes:</p>
<p>? FOR restricting the rights of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public. See ACU’s vote 3, 1998.</p>
<p>? FOR allowing the IRS to require political and policy organizations to disclose their membership—a vote against the constitutional rights of free association and privacy. (The Clinton Administration used such IRS intimidation against conservative groups that opposed them.) See ACU’s vote 11, 2000.</p>
<p>? AGAINST impeachment proceedings against President Clinton, specifically the reappointment and reauthorization of managers (drawn from the Republican membership of the House Judiciary Committee) to conduct the impeachment trial in the Senate. See ACU’s vote 1, 1999.</p>
<p>? AGAINST an accelerated elimination of the “marriage penalty.” See ACU’s vote 10, 2001.</p>
<p>? FOR handouts to politicians, specifically taxpayer funding of presidential campaigns. See ACU’s vote 6, 1995.</p>
<p>? FOR handouts to politicians, specifically congressional perks such as postage and broadcast time funded by taxpayers. See ACU’s vote 13, 1996.</p>
<p>? AGAINST restraints on federal spending, specifically the Phil Gramm (R-TX) amendment to limit non-defense discretionary spending to the fiscal 1997 levels requested by President Clinton. See ACU’s vote 6, 1997.</p>
<p>? FOR affirmative action in federal contracts. See ACU’s vote 9, 1995.</p>
<p>? FOR the Legal Services Corporation, the perennial liberal boondoggle that provides political activism disguised as “legal services” to Democratic constituencies. See ACU’s vote 16, 1995, and vote 17, 1999.</p>
<p>? FOR an increase in the minimum wage, which, of course, increases unemployment among the young and poor. See ACU’s vote 16, 1996.</p>
<p>? FOR President Clinton’s nomination of Dr. David Satcher as U.S. Surgeon General. Among other things, Satcher opposed a full ban on partial-birth abortion. See ACU’s vote 1, 1998.</p>
<p>? FOR open-ended military commitments, specifically in regard to U.S. troops in Kosovo. See ACU’s vote 8, 2000.</p>
<p>? FOR corporate welfare, specifically the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC). See ACU’s vote 23. 1999.</p>
<p>? AGAINST worker and shareholder rights, specifically the Hatch (R-UT) amendment to require unions and corporations to obtain permission from dues-paying members or shareholders before spending money on political activities. See ACU’s votes 4 and 5, 2001.</p>
<p>? AGAINST property rights and FOR unlimited presidential power, specifically by allowing President Clinton to implement the American Heritage Rivers Initiative, which he established by executive order, without congressional approval. See ACU’s vote 20, 1997.</p>
<p>? FOR restricting the First Amendment (free speech) rights of independent groups. See ACU’s vote 23, 1997.</p>
<p>? FOR the trial lawyers lobby, and specifically against a bill that would put common-sense limitations on the medical malpractice suits that increase health costs for all of us. (Of course! He’s been a trial lawyer himself for some three decades.) See ACU’s vote 18, 2002.</p>
<p>And, last but not least:</p>
<p>? FOR limitations on campaign freedom of speech, by limiting contributions to national political parties to $2,000 and limiting the rights of individuals and groups to participate in the political process in the two months before elections. See ACU’s vote 7, 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael S. Strahan</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5325</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S. Strahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5325</guid>
		<description>So far I have the bun and all the fixin's but "Where is the beef?"
The truth is no matter who the president is he/she will need a cooperative congress to get any legislation through.
What we have is truly a broken government and so far I don't see anyone with the ability to fix the problems in the house and senate.
I hope we get some real answers real soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far I have the bun and all the fixin&#8217;s but &#8220;Where is the beef?&#8221;<br />
The truth is no matter who the president is he/she will need a cooperative congress to get any legislation through.<br />
What we have is truly a broken government and so far I don&#8217;t see anyone with the ability to fix the problems in the house and senate.<br />
I hope we get some real answers real soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PolitiPornster</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5305</link>
		<dc:creator>PolitiPornster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/16/romney-lessens-expectations-in-south-carolina/#comment-5305</guid>
		<description>So which of the GOP candidates is behind the SwiftBoat attacks on McCain?  
See the story here- http://www.politiporn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which of the GOP candidates is behind the SwiftBoat attacks on McCain?<br />
See the story here- <a href="http://www.politiporn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.politiporn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
