Comments on: O’Reilly Drops in on Hillary

By: patricia chaisson

patricia chaisson — Sat, 03 May 2008 12:31:33 +0000

We need a very smart business person to run this country and I beleive Hillary can do this hands down.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Thu, 01 May 2008 21:53:58 +0000

I cannot believe why Bill interviewed Hillary when he was not friendly with the Clintosn????Why on earth a Conservative like Bill should interview her at this stage knowing very well the dirty tricks which Hillary and Bill Clinton play in the Presidential elections.They both have amassed a fortune after Bill Clinton finished his term.They both have lots of baggage in their back yard especially the foundation of Bill Clinton.He only mentions how he did this and that in the 1990s when he was President,how well he crows about everything except his moral experiences etc.He is an unfit and a disgrace to the country.Just imagine if hillary(God forbid) wins,Bill Clinton will run the show at every stage at the White House.never should a Bush or Clinton family be allowed to run terms for more than 8yrs.God save USA.I have been a conservative and shocked that Bill is upto some mischief to promote Hillary at this time to deny Obama’s efforts???I always respected Bill Orielly but not any more.John Macain is better to be President in spite of criticizm from Conservatives.Jimmy

By: Twila Beyeler

Twila Beyeler — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:56:51 +0000

I just looked at a clip. Will she never change. The way she spoke to Bill was so grade schoolish?? Is that a word? I heard kids in grade school talk in that tone to people. Bill must somehow get under her skin. (I will be 83 on Friday, so you know I have seen a lot of this type of sarcasim). Thank you.

By: edward

edward — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:53:36 +0000

FOX news is so hypocritical to criticize Clinton and others who dont want to interview with them at their whim, beck and call…but turn around and deny Ron Paul to debate on FOX with the FOUR Republican candidates FOX deems electable on the Republican side. This is so pitifully obvious that FOX as well as other major media want to control the agenda and the political leaders by access. This is a horrendous example of why recent FCC rule changes allowing MORE centralizing of media ownership should be questioned and reversed immediately. We dont need FOX ownership telling us who is and who is not deemed worthy or running for any office in our country. Just report the Goddamn news for once without slanting it to your views.

By: Bee

Bee — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:01:52 +0000

I watched the debates last night and what I would like to know is — IN JUST ABOUT EVERY QUESTION, WHY DOES HILLARY BASH PRESIDENT BUSH? He is not running for President again, but she has been the only one who CONTINUOUSLY bashes the President. Others have done the same bash thing — but not as much as her. Also, when asked at the end of the debate if she had to name one thing she would do differently or over or acknowledge a mistake — SHE CAN’T!!! THIS WOMAN REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SHE IS EVER WRONG OR HAS MADE ANY MISTAKES AND SHE’S NOT APOLOGIZED FOR ANYTHING. A LITTLE HUMILITY WOULD SERVE HER GREATLY. THANKS FOR LISTENING (READING).

By: Robert

Robert — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:36:27 +0000

I find odd that everyone at FOX thinks that after the IA and NH primaries, the 2 candidates for President are pick.. These two states are smaller combined in population than almost all the other states alone that have yet to vote. Are there not 50 states in the USA ????

I fail to understand that these 2 small states reprsent ALL of america. They do not.

It is not responsible for the media to assume that after 2 primaries that it is over. I think they also discount that this will be a HUGE election, unlike most in our history , as people are sick and tired of the Norm. The candidate that will honestly change out course , remains to be seen.I don’t think the can comppare this election with past ones. After 8 years of getting the shaft by the Bush Amin, the American people are going to take this country back

THERE ARE 48 OTHER STATES left to choose.

I also find it odd that nobody is mentioning Michael Bloomberg. He has stated recently and clearly that if the candidates are Obama and anyone on the other side, He will run as an indpendant. He said in reports that he is already gathering his team. Dont discount him entering , and that he will spend a BILLION dollars on his campain if he runs. I am not saying I am for him, but he will get notice running as an independant. If the DEM is Obama, he said he will run.

I also would like to say that this DICK MORRIS guy calling the shots for fox is funny as heck. Do they really thing that we listen to a guy who was caught in a hotel room with a prostitute , wearing a DIAPER, while signing POPEYE THE SAILOR MAN ???? Please

Lastly, I would hope that whoever wins the Presidency would sit down with the generals, and such to be informed about withdrawing troops before they just decide to . To do otherwise would be ILL responsible BIG TIME

By: Diane (with one "N") from California

Diane (with one "N") from California — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 10:34:50 +0000

Mrs. Martin, Bravo! I’ve been waiting for someone to make those points. “Give him points for courage” when she is not brave enough to go on Bill’s show and talk to him face to face! Yeah, she’s so scary, imagine Bill having the guts to walk into the same room as her. Good grief! How is she going to deal with Ahmanutjob or Hugo Chavez is she can’t face Bill? I applaud him for making her face him. She’s the one who looks foolish.

Furthermore, it’s very safe for her to say she wants to pull the troops out of Iraq within six months when that wouldn’t be until June of 2009! General Petraeus is pulling three brigades starting in the spring with more to follow as things continue to improve there. She’s making an empty promise that she has no intention of following through on. Like Rush says, once she gets to the Oval Office (God forbid) she will say she has new information, it’s too risky to pull out the troops, and the same people who said they want out “now” will kiss her feet for being so smart. It’s total pandering and it’s dishonest and despicable.

By: mrs.martin

mrs.martin — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:19:54 +0000

oh yeah the reason Bill had to have a young woman ask the question is because Mrs. Clinton would never answer any questions from him. He has been trying for years for Mrs. Clinton to go on his show and answer questions, after all if you are running for President you should be able to be asked some tough questions. I guess she can’t do that!

By: mrs.martin

mrs.martin — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:16:20 +0000

First of all I think it is funny that some of you think it was so horrible for Bill O to attend Mrs. Clinton’s rally or whatever that was. Why shouldn’t he be able to attend? How do you feel about all the debates being handled by liberal hosts? The Dems wouldn’t go on Fox and answer any questions or debate but its ok that the Republicans go on CNN, ABC and every other liberal station. Why don’t they have someone like Bill or Rush or Sean run a dem debate and have the dem candidates answer some important questions instead of all of those softball questions they get asked by the lib hosts.
As far as Barack Hussein Obama he really scares me because he really has no knowledge of foreign policy or any other policy. That is evident when he does ever get close to the subject although most of the time he just speaks of change change change. We just don’t know what his plans are, like Mrs. Clinton they both have to ask someone when they become President what they should do next. Thats is scary!
I think Bill O is a good man, he does so much for children and our great military. God Bless

By: Jan

Jan — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:07:59 +0000

How weird!
Fox goes bonkers that Clinton won’t answer questions.
Then they finally get to ask a question of Clinton at one of our famous New Hampshire q&a’s.

And what do WE get, as far as information?
A bunch of b-roll of BOR!!!

Seriously, Aaron, what kind of journalism is this?

Fox demands an answer.
SHOW THE ANSWER!