Comments on: Record Turnout in Iowa

By: Marge Balistrere

Marge Balistrere — Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:34:17 +0000

John Edwards i can’t believe you would stoop at low as to accuse the Clintons regarding MLK. They have always admired him. and you know that. You will stoop as low as you can for a vote. Your the Racist.! I’ve lost all respect for you. You need to stay home and care for your wife–we know your proprities!

By: Suzy Ganyon NC

Suzy Ganyon NC — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 23:05:03 +0000

Right on Art!!!
Fox have been very unfair because our “slow talkin” ranch style candidate with a real conservative message (Which this house happens to think is appealing) can’t answer in 30 seconds I guess. I can only think it is easier to omit him from the rosters in the caucus and primaries.
In all fairness when they give him over 30 secs. as Neil Cavuto did tonight the real truth of our country is heard.

By: Art Caprario

Art Caprario — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 21:50:47 +0000

Your recap excluded Fred Thompson. Fox which I watch religiously (no pun intended) has done little in covering Fred’s campaign. As a Fred Thompson supporter I think that this is unfair, given that he is the most conservative of all those running. McCain has a clip and he came in fourth, behind Fred.

Try working on that fair and balanced thing some more please!

P.S. I loved Denise’s comment! You are right on lady!

By: Denise

Denise — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:11:58 +0000

Iowa has shown us that the American people can see through the Clintons’ 2-for-1 strategy, which we first heard from Bill back in 1992. At President Bush’s first inauguration, Bill said, “We’ll be back.” It’s part of Bill and Hillary’s life-long plan. Fortunately, it’s been rejected, and we can only hope the rest of the country follows suit.

I did not ask for 2-for-1 then, nor do I ask for it now. That’s just the life-long Clinton strategy that moves Hillary into a position for which she is not qualified.

Every time Bill moves up (Gov of Arkansas), Hillary moves up with him (Attorney General of Arkansas). Bill moves up again (President of the US); Hillary moves up with him (US Senate). See the pattern, women?

Consider what America got with the first Clinton co-Presidency:

• Abuse of the powers of the office of the President
• Granting Presidential pardons to buy Hillary’s election to the Senate. As a woman who made it on my own, Hillary’s need to ride Bill’s coattails and her sense of entitlement (as in “it’s my turn and Obama should wait his turn”) makes me doubt her capabilities.
• Hillary’s long-suffering marriage to Bill, enabling a lifetime of sexual trysts and trying to contain the Bimbo eruptions, gives me a President without the backbone to stand up to a man. Hillary claims to be tough enough to play with the boys when, in fact, she is unable to leave a cheating husband. How will she stand up to other male leaders who see this in “Mrs.” Clinton and walk all over her?
• Being married to a former President does not make one qualified to be President.
Hillary has less experience in elected office than Barack. She’s held elected office for one Senate term plus one year and has introduced no major legislation during that time. She showed us in the interview about Pakistani elections the extent of her foreign policy experience–she did not know what office the election was for or who was on the ballot! Is this the kind of experience we want in the Oval Office?

I am not a “Hillary hater;” I am an America lover. Please consider very carefully which candidate the Democratic Party puts on the ballot. The future of this country absolutely depends on it.