<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama wants to be your second choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/</link>
	<description>The FOX News embedded producers report the latest news from the 2008 presidential campaign trail</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ALVIN</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-8635</link>
		<dc:creator>ALVIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-8635</guid>
		<description>DONT BE MAD KEVIN. TO BE HONEST IM STILL AMAZED HE'S A CONGRESSMAN.THAT LET YOU NOW NUT'S WILL VOTE FOR ANYBODY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DONT BE MAD KEVIN. TO BE HONEST IM STILL AMAZED HE&#8217;S A CONGRESSMAN.THAT LET YOU NOW NUT&#8217;S WILL VOTE FOR ANYBODY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kucinich lends support to Obama &#171; FOX Embeds &#171; FOXNews.com</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Kucinich lends support to Obama &#171; FOX Embeds &#171; FOXNews.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 01:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-728</guid>
		<description>[...] supporters to realign behind Obama. The &#8220;second choice&#8221; vote is one that Obama has been pitching to voters for some days [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] supporters to realign behind Obama. The &#8220;second choice&#8221; vote is one that Obama has been pitching to voters for some days [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Denise,

You've stated that Hillary Clinton was Attorney General of Arkansas, when in fact she never held any elected office in Arkansas.

You've made that statement numerous times on this forum, and I've posted corrections in response.  The issue of who was or wasn't Attorney General of Arkansas is not even up for debate or interpretation--it's part of the public record.  Why do you keep posting a lie?  What else about your statement is false?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denise,</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve stated that Hillary Clinton was Attorney General of Arkansas, when in fact she never held any elected office in Arkansas.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve made that statement numerous times on this forum, and I&#8217;ve posted corrections in response.  The issue of who was or wasn&#8217;t Attorney General of Arkansas is not even up for debate or interpretation&#8211;it&#8217;s part of the public record.  Why do you keep posting a lie?  What else about your statement is false?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>With so much for our country's future at stake in Iowa, let's hope all Iowans can see the issue as clearly as this man--that is, another round of Bill and Hillary will not bring the change we so desperately need.  They are old and tired and just more of the same bipartisan fighting and dysfunction.

Their 2-for-1 strategy gets old after a while.  I did not ask for 2-for-1 then, nor do I ask for it now.  That's just the life-long Clinton strategy that moves Hillary into a position for which she is not qualified.  

Every time Bill moves up (think Gov of Arkansas), Hillary moves up with him (think Attorney General of Arkansas).  Bill moves up again (think President of the US); Hillary moves up with him (think US Senate).  See the pattern, women?

Consider what America got with the first Clinton co-Presidency:

•        Abuse of the powers of the office of the President 
•        Granting Presidential pardons to buy Hillary's election to the Senate.  As a woman who made it on my own, Hillary's need to ride Bill's coattails and her sense of entitlement makes me doubt her capabilities.  
•        Hillary's long-suffering marriage to Bill, enabling a lifetime of sexual trysts and trying to contain the Bimbo eruptions, gives me a President without the backbone to stand up to a man.  Hillary claims to be tough enough to play with the boys when, in fact, she is unable to leave a cheating husband.  How will she stand up to other male leaders who see this in "Mrs." Clinton and walk all over her?
•        Being married to a former President does not make one qualified to be President.
Hillary has less experience in elected office than Barack.  She's held elected office for one Senate term plus one year and has introduced no major legislation during that time.  Is this the kind of experience we want in the Oval Office?  

I am not a "Hillary hater;" I am an America lover.  Please consider very carefully which candidate the Democratic Party puts on the ballot.  The future of this country absolutely depends on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With so much for our country&#8217;s future at stake in Iowa, let&#8217;s hope all Iowans can see the issue as clearly as this man&#8211;that is, another round of Bill and Hillary will not bring the change we so desperately need.  They are old and tired and just more of the same bipartisan fighting and dysfunction.</p>
<p>Their 2-for-1 strategy gets old after a while.  I did not ask for 2-for-1 then, nor do I ask for it now.  That&#8217;s just the life-long Clinton strategy that moves Hillary into a position for which she is not qualified.  </p>
<p>Every time Bill moves up (think Gov of Arkansas), Hillary moves up with him (think Attorney General of Arkansas).  Bill moves up again (think President of the US); Hillary moves up with him (think US Senate).  See the pattern, women?</p>
<p>Consider what America got with the first Clinton co-Presidency:</p>
<p>•        Abuse of the powers of the office of the President<br />
•        Granting Presidential pardons to buy Hillary&#8217;s election to the Senate.  As a woman who made it on my own, Hillary&#8217;s need to ride Bill&#8217;s coattails and her sense of entitlement makes me doubt her capabilities.<br />
•        Hillary&#8217;s long-suffering marriage to Bill, enabling a lifetime of sexual trysts and trying to contain the Bimbo eruptions, gives me a President without the backbone to stand up to a man.  Hillary claims to be tough enough to play with the boys when, in fact, she is unable to leave a cheating husband.  How will she stand up to other male leaders who see this in &#8220;Mrs.&#8221; Clinton and walk all over her?<br />
•        Being married to a former President does not make one qualified to be President.<br />
Hillary has less experience in elected office than Barack.  She&#8217;s held elected office for one Senate term plus one year and has introduced no major legislation during that time.  Is this the kind of experience we want in the Oval Office?  </p>
<p>I am not a &#8220;Hillary hater;&#8221; I am an America lover.  Please consider very carefully which candidate the Democratic Party puts on the ballot.  The future of this country absolutely depends on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2007/12/31/obama-wants-to-be-your-second-choice/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>The fox news is a big disgrace to america  by excluding Ron Paul. I don't think the Lame Stream Media understands exactly how much popularity Ron Paul really has, and how much his ideas are resonating with Americans. The American people aren't stupid, and we understand the dire situation our country is headed in. Especially the economic crisis we are going to suffer. The Dollar is declining in value week after week, U.S. imperialism goes unchecked at the expense of our Republic, and we middle class Americans are overtaxed, and over-regulated. 

We The People are not going to let a Lame media stand in the way of progress and restoring The Constitution. Ron Paul is the only candidate offering REAL solutions to REAL problems. Ron Paul has my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fox news is a big disgrace to america  by excluding Ron Paul. I don&#8217;t think the Lame Stream Media understands exactly how much popularity Ron Paul really has, and how much his ideas are resonating with Americans. The American people aren&#8217;t stupid, and we understand the dire situation our country is headed in. Especially the economic crisis we are going to suffer. The Dollar is declining in value week after week, U.S. imperialism goes unchecked at the expense of our Republic, and we middle class Americans are overtaxed, and over-regulated. </p>
<p>We The People are not going to let a Lame media stand in the way of progress and restoring The Constitution. Ron Paul is the only candidate offering REAL solutions to REAL problems. Ron Paul has my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
